Would you trade your late model car, flat screen TV, 3G cellphone and summer house at Cape Hadderas for love in a shack 1 mile above sealevel in Colorado Mountains? Living happely ever after with your family and no electicity.
Oops, I was hoping this thread was going to die. You´re going to get it know. Thanks for the support though, but I regret ever posting this. It was supposed to be a joke but got out of hand.
You get used to it. You will to. Also you pay $200 in anual tax for your car. Inspection $50, Toll going in and out of Stockholm about $5. Insurance is cheap though. I pay $40 for P.I.P.
I miss the fact that I never frooze. I miss the fact that I could sleep as much as I wanted. I miss the fact that I had all I could eat. I miss the fact that I never had to go to the bathroom. I miss the fact that my mother was always near. I miss the fact that I could hold my breath and swim much longer then. I don´t miss the fact that they put a plier on my head and yanked me out.
Oops, I can´t find the stupid article now. But after confering with my sometimes tired mind. It must have been Neutrinos they detected to have mass. As far as I know photons cant penetrate earth. It sure is lucky though for our green friends that they are around.
If big bang originated in one singularity and then expanded. Is it no fair to asume that we are not at the far edge, neither at the centre. If we where to gaze into the near proximity of the centre and in a direct line beyond shouldn´t we exed the age of the know universe? If the radius from the centre to the edge is 15 billion light years and we are somewhere in the middle. Then shouldn´t it be possible to view beyond 15? Now I´m thinking 3 dimensional I know. If we where on a surface of a 2 dimensional ballon. Then wouldn´t there be an abundance of light in two direction and hardly no at all in the other two? One other thing, I don´t see that the big bang or Higgs field expansion would have a boundary that keeps out light from outside the expansion. I mean as far as anyone know existens of matter can have been around for an infinite time. So light that is 200 billion years old or even older should reach us from all directions and from all over penetrating our bubble as to say. Somehow it´s a little like in the old days when people thought that stars where on a dome above us and gods realmed outside.
That must have been a bad joke because nobody understood it! I haven´t read the whole damn thread, neither will I. The threads that are 1 ot 2 pages I do. Some times you get an reply from someone who hasn´t. That´s what I wanted to get at. Taking one reply in a thread out of context. Can make you say ridiculus things.
Sury prettyface. My nickname was Owl. Due to the fact of a childrens TV show, where there was an Owl living in an chimney that new all the answers. I guess my fellow student didn´t like me raising my hand all the time.
This causes my to think up another question. Pre Big bang settings. Why would only one Higgs boson inflate? What happens when two simultainious Higgs bosons inflates and intrude on each others realm? If their boundaries intermingle without interferance then their could be an infinite amount of expanding bosons originating from an infinte amount of singularities. If they do interfere with one and another, then their should be a boundary. One other thing, when gazing upon the stars it´s concieved that you look back in time. If you then have the strongest possible telescope there shold be a boundary out there where the stars of our universe doesn´t shine yet. What if that the universe we see is actually a continious loop of bent photons(light) travelling around in a circle. What I´m saying is if mass is greater in the center wouldn´t light be bent in an general direction making it travel in a circle around the centre? Thus giving direct view straight out to the boundary mor or less impossible. If this is the case maybee we are gazing upon our own sun way out there, thinking it´s another star zillions of miles away. I´m no physicist so maybee I don´t make sense?
This experiment was conducted in a deep mine. They measured the amount of photons collected and also the direction. If photons have no mass the photons should come in equal numbers from all directions. During the experiment how ever photons travelling through the Earth was far far less then those comming from above. Thus it seems they have a mass. All measures where taken to eliminate false readings from contamination.
I have recently read that they have made an experiment down under to detect if photons have mass. According to that experiment photons had mass. If photons have mass, can Higgs bosons with zero spin exist in they way that have been belived? You are free to roam your thoughts, please though keep apart what´s proven and whats hypotetical so I´ll can keep track.
Honesty is saying what people want here without lying. Telling the truth about something that people doesn´t want to here is not honesty but a confession.
joovisst Forum Posts (812)
Neird varning! What do you collect?
So I´ll start the collection for you, can´t resist. If you make it public, then I´ll know it wasn´t special.Muhhhaaaaaaaa.