The Final Word
The bottom line remains this: Trump did not violate federal campaign finance laws. Why? Because the payments to Daniels and McDougal amounted to a “private transaction,” as the president himself acknowledged, for a purpose he believed to be unrelated to politics.The president is correct that the payments had nothing to do with politics, and everything to do with brand management.
The “Trump” name is a brand, and that brand is big business. Protecting that brand’s reputation is critical to the business that uses it – just as it is for brands like Pepsi-Cola or United Airlines.
The fact that the man whose name is Trump happened to be a political candidate did not magically transform brand management into a campaign contribution.
Whatever money was paid out was clearly done to protect “Trump” the corporate brand – not Trump the political candidate, just as the Trump business has done before.
In the Justice Department’s memorandum not a single shred of evidence was presented to explain how a legal business expense became an illegal campaign contribution. Speculation, I repeat, 'speculation' is not enough to prosecute so-called “campaign finance violations.” Prosecutors in the SDNY will have a very hard time proving otherwise and making the case for a felony charge.
NOT HAPPENING!!
Comments (18)
After all the time, money, and effort wasted, there is ZERO on Trump.
Now another 2 years will be wasted while the Dems have the house. I'll be so glad for 2020, when we have all 3 branches again and can finish MAGA!!
I didn't say the last 2 years has been a waste.