America vs. America

Think we will hear some of the defense today, it can be interesting.

In what ever I have written about Trump, a main question for me have to do with the polarisation of the people. You have two main parties in battle over different politics. You have strong opposition to the impeachment. For me it has become a bit clearer now.
There are two oposing narratives, which is like taken out of a spy novel. There are Fox, CNN, RT news, CBS, etc.

It is pretty strange that Trump have had that many phone calls with Putin, and some have wondered about that connection. It may very well be very simple - he may believe the Giuliani thread of stories. Giuliani may believe Giuliani. And opposed to this, you have what the House investigation believes.

In any case, it should not be all that difficult to present the opposing camps of beliefs and flesh out what is true or not. The President have some explaining to do. If he cannot explain what the facts are, then he is deceiving the nation.

Present the facts.
Post Comment

Comments (90)

You're so cool...
applause
Thank you....appreciate it, but please....a little more fawning next time. . .lol.

applause
@Frontnine35 - not in a good mood today ? want to borrow some crayons ? ;)
"narrative with strong suggestion"

Lol...I have to look that one up as relevant for procedures.



confused
@Frontnine35 - glad to see you in a better mood, but you know ..
"Again.....supposition is nonsense not worth commentary." - you did comment ;)
Yep, I'm consistently being quoted. Hell, if you need some help I might even switch sides and take the opposition. So far none of you are gaining ground on any topic. You at least try for solid ground, but slip back when you run out of rationale. If that high ground wasn't so steep and littered with such fools, it would be easier footing. Set your sights on being more conservative in what you seek to accomplish.
thumbs up
" Senate are so afraid of losing their jobs they will lie to support Trump"

Specifically, when did they lie....about what? Back something up.....for once....lol.

Ever wonder where the word 'suppository' came from......that's right, a liberals a**....rolling on the floor laughing


cool
Frontnine35 - nice of you to offer some help. We are not gaining ground on any topic ? I guess that depends on what you measure, and what the objectives would be ? I have tried to figure out your stand on matters, which is not more convincing or more factual based then ideas others may have. We can probably agree that Trump have a pretty blunt and rough way choice of words. He is more into attacks then of argument. And that puts people off. His background history is not exemplary either. His manner cause opposition. There are a lot of natural causes for people to oppose him. Fair enough ? Many of his supporters seem to enjoy it, and I see it displayed often.
Words does matter. Obama did follow what previous administrations did in economics. He had little choice regarding the matter. And Trump is bound by the same realities. He also would like to do some changes. He is not in favor of monetary easing either. There are obvious flaws in capitalism, which have brought us to the current situation. It sure was not the "left" that promoted or wished to export work places to China or elsewhere. Trump knows that very well, and have talked about it well before he came into politics.
So all the talks about the traditionally parties, left/right, is not what he adhere to. But his hands are also bound by the current economic situation. And the impeachment is not simply that his opponents just want to sink him. He have caused much of the situation himself. For what reasons he have done so, is of course an interesting question. He may have his reasons, and that is what people want to know. It is obvious that we do not have the information. As it should be an open and free democratic nation, people are entitled to know. Without it, it is everyone's guess. And both you and me can exercise the freedom of guessing. It is that simple.

And btw. you are not alone having a vote. It is not dependent on education, of having the best argument, of having leanings to either this or the other side. Nor does it matter if some of us happen to be outside the border.
" He is not in favour of monetary easing either." - well, Trump had to bow and accept it for now, while he actually want to raise taxes. So, if he will get another term, this may change. Cannot recall sources, except Steve Bannon told this as well. What you described is in fact what Obama did, and Trump continued. I don't claim to know that much about economics, but found it interesting that this was not what Trump wanted.
What do you mean by 'monetary easing'? I'm pretty sure you're confused with the two words...and Trump wanted to raise taxes....again, where do you get that?

I think you should leave economics to someone else. You're losing footing again.



cool
No matter who is in office we will get deceived, the only thing we get is a vote.

Oh they will have town hall meetings and we will get to see Bills being signed, but whether we like it or not we get what they are willing to give us. The United States may be the greatest country in the world, but we have many problems that stay hidden because no one wants to talk about public schools being so cold that the kids have to wear coats and hats and gloves in the class room. Some say, well at least they have a roof over their heads, and that is at the very least and it is usually leaking. Then they have mold to deal with. 51% of our public schools need repairs, renovations, and modernizations to be in "good overall condition."

More than 47,000 bridges need urgent repairs..think about that the next time you're driving over one of these structurally deficient bridges.

sad flower
@Frontnine35 - well, you could check out Steve Bannon's FRONTLINE intervue "America's Great Divide" as a start, it's was in 2 parts.

@hpylady -"No matter who is in office we will get deceived, the only thing we get is a vote." - yes, but there is no reason it should be like this. "government of the people, by the people, for the peopleā€ - they are accountable to the people, they are employed by the people. It does not only mean by the ballot box. There are other governments around the world that manage to hold government and leaders in check, far better then America. It could be done. A reason why it is not, may be some of what Bannon seem to say about the divide. I would probably understand it to point to the "swamp". The elite that seem to get away with it ? But sure, it doesn't have to be like that. And by the way, I agree with what you said and you may wonder a bit when you hear what a cruise missile cost. I would think those schools would be a better investment ?
@Frontnine35 - well, I did not expect you to make the case for me ;) just answered your previous question.
With all that change in technology, one would think I could get an answer to the questions I gave to the OP, not just long winded flyers of disconnected thought and links.

To refresh your memory(?)....please explain 'monetary easing', as you referenced it, and how you said President Trump wanted to raise taxes?

dunno
Newt Gingrich calls out Schiff's 'lies' as 'deranged'
Check what Bannon said, I don't have a transcript of it.
I am following the Senate Trial, and at this very moment they have called for a "real" trial with witnesses and documents. In my view, any fair trial deserve that, as well as the people.
too bad , all over bar the vote and the spastic leftist reaction .
E-That should do it. Collins and Romney left but we have the votes. Murkowski and Alexander say 'Nope', it's a done deal. The do nothing dems will now take up a new narrative, that of the acquittal being illegal....watch...lol....an illegal legal trial of impeachment and an illegal legal 2020 election.

Romney has till 2025...too bad...he won't get reelected as a Republican.

It's very close to November. The people won't forget this embarrassment to our country. Paybacks coming...remember...."an elephant never forgets".

innocent
Too bad, sad story, in my view - because the question has to do with the rights and role of the office, a question that should have been raised years ago.
Questions asked but unanswered.....hmmm, that sounds familiar.....lol.

rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing

cool
Yes, I believe there will be a lot more questions now. Is the Senate part of a cover-up ? The defense laywer implicated ? McConnel had information about who was implicated ? ....and we can continue...
Lol.....what defense lawyer? Dershowitz? You have another missing link that explains whatever you're talking about?....rolling on the floor laughing

confused
Cipollone.
Lol......sleep

cool
In letter to Chairman of the Committe on Judiciary, also Jay Sekulow involvment is told.
So, of course people will ask questions.
Former U.S. Sen. John Warner (R-VA) asserted in his statement that not having witnesses would do "lasting damage" to the Senate. "If witnesses are suppressed in this trial and a majority of Americans are left believing the trial was a sham, I can only imagine the lasting damage done to the Senate, and to our fragile national consensus. The Senate embraces its legacy and delivers for the American people by avoiding this risk,"

I think people will ask questions
So, what ever happens, it is clear that the Republicans have sided with Trump, which will make them a target. The House can continue to get evidence, Bolton's book will come out, and Giuliani may be indicted, and Trump will never appear clean.

So ? ...it can only get worse
Yeah , Boltons book will come out , be in the fiction section along with all the other tell all books been printed in the last 3 years , Did you buy Comeys book ? history has shown what a mongrel he was .
Gulliani will be writing his memoirs from prison...lol... laugh

Worth a read and a laugh...grin
Lol....
Yeah, I'm definitely concerned.....more predictions from such reliable sources.....lol.

cool
@Frontnine35 - right, I forgot that you are so well informed.

United States core institutions do not seem to handle this very well. Presidents come and go, so - how do you thing other countries around the world feel assured that they can trust a President that is not reliable ? Even his own administration does not trust him. Do you think Ukraine trust him ? Or China ? Or Europe ? They do not need United States. EU trade rules, will not bow to US rules. Trump has even made worries withing Allied Forces that they cannot rely on him. Perhaps Congress and Senate, but when he actually block them, like military assistance to Ukraine - what do you imagine that tell them ?

The world have heard about his perfect call. Do you think they take question his perfect deals ? This is your line of expertise, isn't it ? Tell me about your sources.

All he has shown is that he put himself above the interrest of the people and the country. He show little respect of anything or anyone. The moment they are of no use to him, he backstabs and slanders them. Who have any reason to trust him ?

Well, I do not. Sorry,
Arrogant American...typical...roll eyes

Goodnight Trumpette...

barf
Many would probably think I have become a bit fixated ? I don't know. But anyway, I came across something a Senator mentioned that made me check something. I did not pay too much notice of the testimony of Ambassador Yovanovitch, the treat - "she is going to go through some things". Sure, she was obvious shaken by it, but - Trump say a lot of things - however I came across descriptions of how he has intimidated others, which now seem to come into a different light. There are people that actually fear him. And when - as I understood it, a Senator kind of gave a wink in that direction, I started to wonder. And in fact, perhaps there are some real concerns about protection the whistle blower. It appears that Trump may not be a pleasant fellow to fall out with.

Here is a quote made by Trump himself: "I worked with John Kelly, and he was totally unequipped to handle the genius of our great President." - what a remarkable statement to say about yourself ? - and when you notice what he has expressed regarding former employees, you really may question it. And he has some strange stranglehold over people. To me it appears like fear, not someone you would like to cross. He is attracted to power, and I got a sinking feeling about more years with this guy. It may even look cowardly of the Senate not to get rid of him.

Feel a bit stupid to be chasing this, but... so be it.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.
Meet the Author of this Blog
2maybe

2maybe

Agder, Aust-Agder, Norway

I am me, of course, and that ought to be enough. But if you don't think so, let me know ;)

STAFF DELETED PHOTOS - there was nothing wrong with them, but they have decided that - IF you don't select a primary photo, then you are not allowed to have [read more]

About this Blog

created Jan 2020
2,415 Views
Last Viewed: 12 hrs ago
Last Commented: Feb 2020
2maybe has 32 other Blogs

Like this Blog?

Do you like this Blog? Why not let the Author know. Click the button to like the Blog. And your like will be added. Likes are anonymous.

Feeling Creative?