Corruption not adequately reported (Part 2)

(The link for Part 1 can be found in the right column of this blog page)

Iceland is the one country that had enough courage to stand up and say no. Its people spoke up and protested until finally its government agreed. The bankers there backed down and said it was a mistake, the money was not owed. They left the country quickly and are now trying to sue Iceland using international courts such as they exist at this time. These same phony investments are what is being used to destroy the economies of Greece, Italy, Ireland and every developed nation in time including the US. We have all bought into them. Our Federal Reserve which most people now realize is not "federal", is operated by these same international banks. For decades they've been illegally printing our money, the duty of congress which they unconstitutionally handed over to the "Fed" using an amendment which was never ratified by the states. For every dollar printed, we incur debt to them as well as the inflation created by printing worthless fiat (not backed by gold) money. In essence we are indebted twice for each dollar printed. And so this corruption that we consider now in real terms, though very poorly reported when mentioned at all in our media--of proportions that no one is prepared to deal with, let alone believe is happening--leads in its entirety and in all its forms, back to the international banks and the interests who control them. We can cower and go back to our television for comfort in the illusion that we are well informed. It is good people that are in most of media and in government. Yet, it does not change the reality of what is happening today and who is manipulating events on a grand scale, regardless of how it's done or why. Consider the control of information and intelligence. There is no better way to control the direction of events and decisions made than to control the information and the related agendas, much of the information and agendas of which are not publicized and used as "inside information" for those who govern and legislate. Could the sources of such information be compromised through their involvement with drug running and arms dealing to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars each year in direct involvement with international banks? At this point common sense is simply too intimidating and most readers may simply look for the compartmentalized mindset that they've been presented with on television. How can such things exist? People in authority as they move up in rank or influence worry more about their job and career and have less access to first hand information. Corporate officers are taught to go along with the status quo, regardless of what is happening and they will reap their reward as they move up, while they watch a CEO retire from a failing company receiving a multi-million dollar retirement package. Whether private or public, employees learn to protect and worry about their role and position, always looking to someone else to make the tough decisions. Most people in the media are probably good people also, but must worry about rocking the boat, being called an extremist and cut from the show or lose their audience. Certain subjects are never seriously covered or covered at all, so there is the question of how free our corporate media really is. All of these issues are actually public knowledge, able to be confirmed. However, in this "information age", one doesn't know what to believe. The one political candidate who seems to be truly aware of the nature of government and corporate influence is Ron Paul. One man cannot save the world, but if enough people can have the same mindset--Yes we can, based upon a knowledgeable and aware electorate with backbone and resolve. It only takes a minority of people to invigorate an entire population, such as Martin Luther King has done over time. He will always be admired for using his influence to promote peaceful protest to create a change in awareness.