About this Blog
by tatami
created Jul 2014
458 Views
Last Viewed: Apr 19
Last Commented: Jul 2014
tatami has 241 other Blogs
tatami Blogs (241)
Feeling Creative?
Report Blogs that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the Blog Abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to Report Blog Abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Comments (9)
Pfui. They ignore other studies. Yes, asbestos for one. Other chemicals now in their environment that weren't before and national governments that don't care about toxins in the drinking water as long as the bribes from the chemical using companies continue and the national economy grows on paper. To me the most telling study are the ones that made having homes with children being located under power lines. Even Tesla warned of this. Cyclical EM radiation does indeed cause cancer in children and adults living under it. The rules about that in this country are not followed in many other countries. As technology spreads, so to do power lines and environments full of electromagnetic fields. We saw brain tumors in the early days of cell phones with the antenna laying alongside the user's head. New designs put the field orientation away from the brain. My suspicion is the anti-tobacco folks are barking (deliberately?) at the wrong horse. I suspect EM fields resulting from the spread of technology and industrialization may be way more important as a cause of cancer.
Of course this attitude puts me across the fence from the oil, gas and coal boys who count only the money to be made from electrification of an area, and who fought tooth, nail and claw against those doctors who decades ago found a link between power lines and dead children.