Politics Blogs (944)

does social workers ( foster care,polic. etc) in western world still take " Atrocities " method ?

Crooked Hillary Clinton said that she did not send or receive any information that was marked classified at the time.


This was a lie.

110 emails in 52 email chains contained classified information at the time they were sent or received. 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time they were sent or received. 8 of those chains contained confidential information at the time they were sent or received.

By sending this information over an unsecure server, Secretary Clinton made it available to hacking by foreign governments or terrorist groups. There is evidence to suggest that she exposed the names of undercover personnel, putting their lives in danger. The information she was negligent with may even have extended to U.S. intelligence gathering methods.
But a recent FBI report revealed that such classified information was marked with a (C) in all emails that were sent to her. She said that she did not realize that (C) stood for ‘Classified’. How could a sitting secretary of state have missed such a detail?

All evidence suggests that she didn’t miss it. All evidence suggest that this is a blatant lie.

It seems that Secretary Clinton intended to break federal law regarding the handling of classified information. She did everything within her power to hide this from the American people.
Crooked Hillary bought used blackberries on eBay, and later destroyed them with hammers when she was finished with them. These evasive actions are indicative of criminal intent.

from Google.


Personally? We're doomed. We'll be history. No more America. Which is exactly what our enemies want. Who are they? That's the question.

I guess most of you know them. I know who they are. For right now the clock is ticking.

You don't want to vote for that nasty Trump chap & his typical alpha male lewd comments toward women, answer yes to the simple questions on this check list & tick the box for Hillary Take no notice of those tyrants in Russia who today have said a vote for Hillary will result in full scale nuclear war, they don't run the world, their opinion is worthless

Answer yes to these simple election questions and Hillary is the obvious choice -

You love American foreign policy from the current government & want to see more of those brutal democratically elected dictators overthrown, after all it worked out so well in Iraq, Libya & Syria, those dictators do nothing but keep those lovable rouge Islamic radicals under control.

Like Moscow the government has built fallout shelters for the entire population of Washington.

Washington has practised evacuating 40 million people in a 3 part practice for nuclear war just this week.

The American government has recalled back to the states all family members of it citizens working abroad in preparation for what comes next.

You're happy the US government has done a deal with Saudi Arabia to allow 8000 IS fighters to escape Mosul before it's retaken & move to fight in Syria.

You fully agree with America arming extremist rebel Muslim fighters as long as of course as they hate Assad & it's all done through 3rd countries so full deny ability is maintained.

So if you answered yes the choice is easy, vote Hillary for a more exciting world, & put a stop to Trump & his silly ideas about border controls & letting other countries sort out there own problems

I have posted articles concerned with government spending and have received acceptance from a number who have read them, I have not posted on CS blog so I am going to give it a try here.
My proposal is cut the base salary of all elected and appointed federal officials by 20%. There are approximately 600 elected legislators whose base salary is $174,000 each year, now doing a little math I find multiplying $174,000 X 600 (mind you that number is a guestimate) equals $88,200,000 , if we multiply that amount by 20% we find it is $17,640,000. Quite a savings I would say. Now think of the other elected, and appointed people that would be affected, for instance the President and VP, judges (Oh boy , just think of the huge number in that category) , there are a number of ambassadors , I could go on but I need to get some sleep tonight. Back to the 600 + legislators, do you realize we are paying them to become millionaires? On top of that, they do little to earn half that amount of money. They do figure out ways to cut the cost of government , such as cutting the cost of food for the poorest in the nation, or medicine for the elderly, or for schools , and for many other programs, but not one thought to reducing the cost of the elected who are on the gravy train. $174,000, that blows my mind ,when I think of my salary as a teacher ! The above is something to ponder on, and I welcome any response from any of you. studicar P.S. The legislature would have to do the adjusting so don't hold your breath, you might think about who you are going to elect in November!

What this election has turned into? Reading the main stream media and listening to the news is just making me feel irritated as we are getting close to the crucial moment of decision day.

Although sound principles and integrity are important aspect of the selection process, it does seem that we are overlooking the most important issues that need to be addressed by delving into the most inane and ridiculous character assassination surrounding this election in general.

The worst part, the media is playing us all like cats and dogs biting at every chance if only to gobble this garbage they are feeding us everyday.

The truth is, like I have said in my previous response why I still support Trump inspite of this allegations of disrespectful incidents on women as expressed in the locker rooms, he is far better choice than that of a criminal, lying b*tch like Hilary with a husband that has not only been criminally convicted of sex assault on women, but that he made it a habit to disregard women's integrity and honor. (Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers and Paula lady, all came out very strong and vocal against Clinton's very bad taste and poor treatment of women.

Trump had been on the limelight for the last 40 years or so and NO ONE ever accused him of this slight before until now that he is running for office.

If anything, he had put forward a very significant effort on making women recognized for what they can accomplish by according them equal pay and management post only given to men for the last 30 to 40 years.

Now I said it, and I will say it again. He is not perfect. He has made some mistakes like most of us do, but he is sincerely apologizing and these are not irrevocable. These are correctable character flaw. He is, in my hope changing for the better.

I dearly wish he were perfect, but with all the make up of global leaders, I do know he comes as one of the finer ones compared to the likes of Putin, Tse Tung, Stalin, etc. etc..

Don't be too harsh on judging him because if we look back at Edwards, Gore, et al., he is not as bad as them. Cheating and lying with their wives..

All women who vote for Trump will receive a complimentary grope!

Donald is an astute hardened businessman. Boardroom bully and accomplished at tax avoidence. His business abilities cannot be disputed. Nor can his racism or his demeaming attitude towards women. Politics is a science and Diplomacy an art. Are his skills and faults transferable to American Presidency. Can a President deal with everything by making you an "offer you cant refuse". Would that resolve or cause conflicts. Im afraid. What do you think.

The Trump supporters have showed their true colors as they continue to support him in the Presidential race.
The Republican Party Members has started withdrawing their support and denounced his words and actions but the loyalists on CS?... never all I can say is Amazing! Smh! True colors smh true colors! Shame on you especially the women after this video!

Love Ana Navarro! She is a Republican but she is not accepting his behavior! Report me if you like for the below video!

"Trump caught on tape making crude, s*xually aggressive comments about women"
'I don’t even wait,' he said — and bragged about how he would 'grab them by the p---y.'
By SHANE GOLDMACHER, ANNIE KARNI and NOLAN D. MCCASKILL 10/07/16 08:18 PM EDT Updated 10/07/16 09:45 PM EDT

Donald Trump bragged about groping, kissing and attempting to have sex with married women — and said he was entitled to do so because he’s a “star” — in a private tape published on Friday that threatens to envelop, if not sink, his candidacy just days before his second presidential debate with Hillary Clinton.
“I don’t even wait,” he boasts, as he talks about groping at women’s genitals.
“And when you’re a star they let you do it,” Trump says to Billy Bush of “Access Hollywood” in a clip from 2005 that was first published by the Washington Post late on Friday. “You can do anything.”
“Whatever you want,” an off-camera voice that appears to be Bush replies.
“Grab them by the pu**y,” Trump says. “You can do anything.”

Read more and listen to video:

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-wapo-229299

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-wapo

229299#ixzz4MSRDwXiD

For it is written: "For YOUR SINS/WRONG DOINGS will SURELY find you out." This is why its so very important that Trump and everyone check their OWN sins/wrong doings BEFORE he/they try to judge and condemn others about their sins/wrong doings. Trump didn't sweep around his OWN front door BEFORE he tried to sweep around Bill Clinton's back door bringing up all Bill's 25 year old past sins and wrong doings of adultery. Bill has repented of his sins before God, but Trump say he has no need to repent or apologize for nothing he says or has done to others or to God.

Now, Trump and his surrogates are trying to do damage control by saying this happened 11 years ago... well Bill's transgressions happened over 20-25 years ago, but Trump still felt a need to bring up all this mess about Bill's adultery to try and win. Fair is fair if Trump can play the game so can others, but we know that's not how Trump works.

People like using the phrase JUDGE NOT" but they tend to forget the rest of this Scripture passages that says, the reason WHY you shouldn't judge or condemn others, if you TOO have past sins and wrong doings and especially, if you have not repented of them.

WRONGFULLY Judging Others Matthew chapter 7: “Do not judge, so that you may not be judged. For with the same judgment you make on others you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. Why do you see the speck in your neighbor’s eye, but do not notice the log in your own eye?"

Romans chapter 2:"Therefore you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgment on another you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, are doing the very same things. You say,“We know that God’s judgment on those who do such things is in accordance with truth.” Do you think, whoever you are, that when you judge those who do such things and yet you do them yourself, you will escape the judgment of God? Or do you despise the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience? Do you not realize that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath, when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed. For he will repay according to each one’s deeds: to those who by patiently doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; while for those who are self-seeking and who obey not the truth but wickedness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be anguish and distress for everyone who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality."

:sad flower:

Many (50 million) watched the vice presidential debate last night? Well, of sort of debate! I say "sort of debate", because I felt Governor Mike Pence was at a disadvantage trying to defend Trump and his plans and why Trump should be President. Pence spent too much time when asked a question, telling short heart felt story lead-ins to make his points, but never really answered any questions directly. It was difficult for Pence, because Trump has no real plans and it was obvious to me, Trump hasn't discussed any concrete plans with Pence other than what we hear at his rallies, same stump foolishness.

Pence couldn't rightly defend Trump on any such outlined policy proposals regarding immigration, the threat of terrorism, Pence never answered as to what he or Trump would do about home grown terrorist, how Trump plan to go about protecting civilians in Syria, plans for safe and no fly zone set ups, Pence did hesitatingly explained faith and public policy positions.

I think Kaine did a much better job of answering and explaining these Clinton interests and issues than Pence. I realize some republicans and republican media outlets are saying Pence outclassed Kaine, but no one is talking about Pence's substance in information sharing on Trump's policies and concerns of the American voters... this, I would think, is more important to voters than who looked good and who won the debate based on one's appearance and jab responses.

Tim Kaine on the other hand, spent too much time interrupting Pence... Kaine had me screaming at the television telling him to "shut Up and let Pence speak". Kaine was driving me crazy, he was overly zealous in his efforts to defend and point out Clinton's plans and proposals, and to denounce Trump. Although Kaine had much more substances and information than Pence, and Kaine knew Clinton's plans and perspective proposals, which Pence didn't have a clue outside of Trump's already talking points of "fixing" and what "needs to be done", Pence said everything but never explaining how Trump would go about implementing such proposals and plans.

All in all, I felt both Vice Presidential candidates did well, considering Kaine had more insightful information into Clinton's plans. Pence was finding it difficult explaining Trump's so-called plans, and Trump can't explain his own plans, so how can a person explain something he/she knows nothing about, except Trump's cheap talk.

Pence without outright lying, could only defend Trump "at afar", and as a Christian, Pence tried the best he could to defend Trump as not having said "this or that" without having to lie for Trump or prove he believes Trump's lies. I like both Kaine and Pence and really think America and the world saw a glimpse of two candidates who outshines their running mates who are seeking the Presidential office. Kaine and Pence should be the ones running for President.

From where I sat, Pence won the debate on his style, grace, and calmness. Kaine won the debate on his assertiveness and knowledge in the matters of Clinton's presidential planed policy proposals for America if she is elected. Kaine had substance and Pence didn't have a clue, but spoke what he THOUGHT were Trump's plans in brief, never really answering direct questions to defend any plans or proposals of Trump, Pence only tried to defend Trump as a person not his non-existing policies.

Maybe the Republicans and Democrats and voters should take another look and who knows, in the end Kaine just might end up being the last minute 2016 Presidential candidate for the Democratic party, and Mike Pence for the last minute 2016 presidential candidate for the Republican party.

Based on substance and information Tim Kaine won the debate, based grace and class Pence won the debate... which one is most important to you as a voter seeking a Presidential leader of America? Class or Substance?