morgan5: So what did he report her for ??? Sorry if i'm sounding dumb, just trying to understand
i don't know if you saw the thread with the banana chasing the strawberry yesterday or not but every one was having fun with it that is what he had her banned for she used it as profile pic because she did not know how to put a pic on the thread she deleted it after awhile completely from her profile pics
caspatch: i don't know if you saw the thread with the banana chasing the strawberry yesterday or not but every one was having fun with it that is what he had her banned for she used it as profile pic because she did not know how to put a pic on the thread she deleted it after awhile completely from her profile pics
Sommerauer71: Absolutely he does! I am not arguing that at all.
But I am against the naming of people who have been involved in private exchanges with other posters.
If he is banned, then he has jeopardised his own 'priviledge;' of posting here. Not in the name of protecting women from stalkers.
I do not fully understand as I am new here but sounds like Cas is an old fashion guy like me(chivalry is not dead), not that women cannot defend themselves but I respect him for what he is doing.
starshinebrightRiverside, California USA6,305 posts
drbombay: I do not fully understand as I am new here but sounds like Cas is an old fashion guy like me(chivalry is not dead), not that women cannot defend themselves but I respect him for what he is doing.
drbombay: I do not fully understand as I am new here but sounds like Cas is an old fashion guy like me(chivalry is not dead), not that women cannot defend themselves but I respect him for what he is doing.
it is nice thing to do, and something he believes in. Just ned to be so careful you have all the story, as on here that often doesn't happen we tell people what we want them to know, kinda human nature
caspatch: i did not use his name and i used hers with permission what i meant by you ladies not having the protection from the stalkers is you are capable of handling them but you can get banned if they follow your every move and look for any infraction. this was for the benefit of the mods and if i get banned and it does some good then it will be worth it
Cas, if we engage with people privately and then they cry out that we have talked and now we have blocked them and run to our friends.
No, you can get banned for posting that you have been stalked. When that is not the case.
If a woman mails a man, or vice versa. Engage in conversation and then that man or woman decides that that person is not for them, then that is not the fault of the person who is rejected.
If the rejected person then asks a person about the person who has rejected them why, and wants an answer and then sees them posting stuff in a forum then it does not make them a stalker.
I have never been stalked, because I do not engage with many people privately, I delete.
Krisha cannot cry that he is stalking her and propel you to post this.
You are not protecting any person Cas, you are at risk of having u s p _ f o r u m _ p o s t _ a d d @ you.
It will not do any good at all, we are all responsible for our own safety.
Maybe I am different from other people, but I don't read this and think 'this is worth it'
I read and think 'This man is in danger of being banned'
drbombay: I do not fully understand as I am new here but sounds like Cas is an old fashion guy like me(chivalry is not dead), not that women cannot defend themselves but I respect him for what he is doing.
Of course he is. Being chivalrous is lovely and he is protecting his friend.
He is doing nothing wrong, at all. I was banned once, for a month and friends in the EU started many threads. They were all pulled by the mods.
Cas, if we engage with people privately and then they cry out that we have talked and now we have blocked them and run to our friends.
No, you can get banned for posting that you have been stalked. When that is not the case.
If a woman mails a man, or vice versa. Engage in conversation and then that man or woman decides that that person is not for them, then that is not the fault of the person who is rejected.
If the rejected person then asks a person about the person who has rejected them why, and wants an answer and then sees them posting stuff in a forum then it does not make them a stalker.
I have never been stalked, because I do not engage with many people privately, I delete.
Krisha cannot cry that he is stalking her and propel you to post this.
You are not protecting any person Cas, you are at risk of having
morgan5: it is nice thing to do, and something he believes in. Just ned to be so careful you have all the story, as on here that often doesn't happen we tell people what we want them to know, kinda human nature
SensualVixenTampa Bay area, Florida USA1,726 posts
caspatch: they haven't said yet she just found out she was banned she is going to ask when she sends in the e mails
If she just now found out that she was banned, then how does she know why she was banned, as you so stated? You are making assumptions of her having a stalker by what she is telling you, and yet she doesn't even know why she was banned or if that thread she started is even the reason.........
Really ? That suprises me but I would think Krisha picture of the bannanna and strawberry was not the reason for her being removed. I dont know how everyone get the inside scoop but I am guessing from email from the parties involved. I am not a Super Hero or the Lone Ranger. I wish her well but can not save the world... Bye Krisha We will miss you.
I cannot feel much sympahty here. I don't feel incensed that Krisha is being stalked, I don't feel that Cas is doing her a favour, or any other women for that matter.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).