Big Bang,inflation and the singularity (117)
Nakedpackage: reincarnation is that can of milk thats been returned..
never had to return one of these yet....
but there is always a first....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sampe1967: who wrote the books you believe in?
I as a free thinker decide what writings to believe.....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sampe1967: who wrote the books you believe in?
I see no reason to believe in any book if I wish not to...Why do you think everyone has to believe in a book of any sort....
Can you say propaganda?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nakedpackage: I as a free thinker decide what writings to believe.....
A free drinker usually is. but i can see that.------ This thread is Archived ------
davpk10: I see no reason to believe in any book if I wish not to...Why do you think everyone has to believe in a book of any sort.... Can you say propaganda?
No one has to but based on his arguments, he does believe in some book.------ This thread is Archived ------
davpk10: I see no reason to believe in any book if I wish not to...Why do you think everyone has to believe in a book of any sort.... Can you say propaganda?
No one has to but based on his arguments, he does believe in some book. and i find no error in the original writings of the Bible, only the translated versions------ This thread is Archived ------
Sampe1967: No one has to but based on his arguments, he does believe in some book. and i find no error in the original writings of the Bible, only the translated versions
So you read Aramaic,Hebrew and Classical Greek,besides Latin?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: So you read Aramaic,Hebrew and Classical Greek,besides Latin?
I have a computer program that is a bible plus. It gives the original writings with three different translations and an option to do the translating yourself by showing all possible meanings for the words.------ This thread is Archived ------
Opinions are like a**hole, everyone has one.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: Actually, there are several ways to look at the same evidence.
You could say that the universe is expanding.
But it's not expanding from any central point as you seem to think. There is no center of the universe, or rather every point in the universe is the center of the universe, and the universe is expanding in all directions at once. What's more, it is not slowing down in that expansion as the original Big Bang hypothesis claimed. Instead, the expansion is accelerating.
Here's a site that explains that way of looking at the situation.
some think the universe is expanding.
However, another way to explain the exact same observable phenomenonis to say that all matter in the universe is shrinking uniformly, (in both size and weight) and that the shrinking process is accelerating.
And besides the 'expanding universe' hypothesis, and the 'shrinking matter' hypothesis, there is yet a third theory to explain the observable situation.
The 'slowing of the speed of light' hypothesis.
The three theories sound very different but they are actually all the same.
Whether the universe is expanding, or all matter is shrinking, or the speed of light is slowing down, the result is exactly the same.
Iamgine 2 airplanes flying. If both planes were shrinking uniformly, a passenger on one plane would seem to observe that the distance between the planes was growing.
And if the speed of light were slowing down, given that the speed of light is the universal constant by which all observation is derived and calibrated, distance would seem to be increasing between all matter.
To a shrinking man it would appear that the universe was growing.
Likewise to a man whose internal clock was ticking slower and slower.
You could say that the universe is expanding.
But it's not expanding from any central point as you seem to think. There is no center of the universe, or rather every point in the universe is the center of the universe, and the universe is expanding in all directions at once. What's more, it is not slowing down in that expansion as the original Big Bang hypothesis claimed. Instead, the expansion is accelerating.
Here's a site that explains that way of looking at the situation.
some think the universe is expanding.
However, another way to explain the exact same observable phenomenonis to say that all matter in the universe is shrinking uniformly, (in both size and weight) and that the shrinking process is accelerating.
And besides the 'expanding universe' hypothesis, and the 'shrinking matter' hypothesis, there is yet a third theory to explain the observable situation.
The 'slowing of the speed of light' hypothesis.
The three theories sound very different but they are actually all the same.
Whether the universe is expanding, or all matter is shrinking, or the speed of light is slowing down, the result is exactly the same.
Iamgine 2 airplanes flying. If both planes were shrinking uniformly, a passenger on one plane would seem to observe that the distance between the planes was growing.
And if the speed of light were slowing down, given that the speed of light is the universal constant by which all observation is derived and calibrated, distance would seem to be increasing between all matter.
To a shrinking man it would appear that the universe was growing.
Likewise to a man whose internal clock was ticking slower and slower.
I'd say it is expanding, which ultimately suggests that it must retract aswell. I believe the universe will collapse into nothing eventually, subsequently followed by another big bang.
A life and death cycle that all matter conforms to.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: Actually, there are several ways to look at the same evidence.
You could say that the universe is expanding.
But it's not expanding from any central point as you seem to think. There is no center of the universe, or rather every point in the universe is the center of the universe, and the universe is expanding in all directions at once. What's more, it is not slowing down in that expansion as the original Big Bang hypothesis claimed. Instead, the expansion is accelerating.
Here's a site that explains that way of looking at the situation.
some think the universe is expanding.
However, another way to explain the exact same observable phenomenonis to say that all matter in the universe is shrinking uniformly, (in both size and weight) and that the shrinking process is accelerating.
And besides the 'expanding universe' hypothesis, and the 'shrinking matter' hypothesis, there is yet a third theory to explain the observable situation.
The 'slowing of the speed of light' hypothesis.
The three theories sound very different but they are actually all the same.
Whether the universe is expanding, or all matter is shrinking, or the speed of light is slowing down, the result is exactly the same.
Iamgine 2 airplanes flying. If both planes were shrinking uniformly, a passenger on one plane would seem to observe that the distance between the planes was growing.
And if the speed of light were slowing down, given that the speed of light is the universal constant by which all observation is derived and calibrated, distance would seem to be increasing between all matter.
To a shrinking man it would appear that the universe was growing.
Likewise to a man whose internal clock was ticking slower and slower.
I am in the slowing speed of light camp but NOT based on the link you posted. Barry Setterfield is a quack. He postulates that the speed of light itself is losing energy over time. This is nonsense and all he's doing is muddying up the waters with his BS. There is a strong religious undertone to his writings.You could say that the universe is expanding.
But it's not expanding from any central point as you seem to think. There is no center of the universe, or rather every point in the universe is the center of the universe, and the universe is expanding in all directions at once. What's more, it is not slowing down in that expansion as the original Big Bang hypothesis claimed. Instead, the expansion is accelerating.
Here's a site that explains that way of looking at the situation.
some think the universe is expanding.
However, another way to explain the exact same observable phenomenonis to say that all matter in the universe is shrinking uniformly, (in both size and weight) and that the shrinking process is accelerating.
And besides the 'expanding universe' hypothesis, and the 'shrinking matter' hypothesis, there is yet a third theory to explain the observable situation.
The 'slowing of the speed of light' hypothesis.
The three theories sound very different but they are actually all the same.
Whether the universe is expanding, or all matter is shrinking, or the speed of light is slowing down, the result is exactly the same.
Iamgine 2 airplanes flying. If both planes were shrinking uniformly, a passenger on one plane would seem to observe that the distance between the planes was growing.
And if the speed of light were slowing down, given that the speed of light is the universal constant by which all observation is derived and calibrated, distance would seem to be increasing between all matter.
To a shrinking man it would appear that the universe was growing.
Likewise to a man whose internal clock was ticking slower and slower.
Light that is traveling from a distant galaxy is being acted on by a matrix of gravity which in my view is taking energy from it which is causing it to travel slower thus leading to the wrong conclusion that the source is receding. I spelled it out years ago in this thread. I don't feel like typing it all again.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Illuminate: Opinions are like a**hole, everyone has one.
Blackholes ..... there is evidence, I've seen one .....
To be taken with humour, as is the intent as always .... I beg you ...
Have a happy fun Friday everyone .....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Illuminate: Opinions are like a**hole, everyone has one.
Hit the QUOTE button so people will know who you're responding to.------ This thread is Archived ------
ooby_dooby: Hit the QUOTE button so people will know who you're responding to.
I wasn't responding to anyone in particular.------ This thread is Archived ------
Sampe1967: No one has to but based on his arguments, he does believe in some book.
I for one cannot believe a book in its entireity that has thousands of instances yet offers no proof whatsoever!
I do believe that parts of the Bible are true as are parts of other books.
------ This thread is Archived ------
TrueBlue1986: I'd say it is expanding, which ultimately suggests that it must retract aswell. I believe the universe will collapse into nothing eventually, subsequently followed by another big bang.
A life and death cycle that all matter conforms to.
A life and death cycle that all matter conforms to.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nakedpackage: My neighbour had a puppy without an arsehole.......
How is that possible?...poor pooch------ This thread is Archived ------
i have a scalpel 
Nakedpackage: My neighbour had a puppy without an arsehole.......
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
What Clothes Do You Feel Comfortable Wearing?
Too many fake profiles here ...
Your Mental Health
Wondering
Name A Book In The Bible That Begins With The First Letter Of Your Name
The world is as you see
Note
Heavy Bass In The PM
New here. Single Guy from Grand Rapids, MI.
What I Lack In Vocabulary
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Actually, there are several ways to look at the same evidence.
You could say that the universe is expanding.
But it's not expanding from any central point as you seem to think. There is no center of the universe, or rather every point in the universe is the center of the universe, and the universe is expanding in all directions at once. What's more, it is not slowing down in that expansion as the original Big Bang hypothesis claimed. Instead, the expansion is accelerating.
Here's a site that explains that way of looking at the situation.
So some think the universe is expanding.
However, another way to explain the exact same observable phenomenonis to say that all matter in the universe is shrinking uniformly, (in both size and weight) and that the shrinking process is accelerating.
And besides the 'expanding universe' hypothesis, and the 'shrinking matter' hypothesis, there is yet a third theory to explain the observable situation.
The 'slowing of the speed of light' hypothesis.
The three theories sound very different but they are actually all the same.
Whether the universe is expanding, or all matter is shrinking, or the speed of light is slowing down, the result is exactly the same.
Iamgine 2 airplanes flying. If both planes were shrinking uniformly, a passenger on one plane would seem to observe that the distance between the planes was growing.
And if the speed of light were slowing down, given that the speed of light is the universal constant by which all observation is derived and calibrated, distance would seem to be increasing between all matter.
To a shrinking man it would appear that the universe was growing.
Likewise to a man whose internal clock was ticking slower and slower.