Forums suggestion (108)
SCatlynBrecon, South Glamorgan, Wales UK5 Threads 2,166 Postsdemonfairy: are you really from obamaville,Indiana..
LOL- I don't think there's a town anywhere in the U.S. with the name Obama in it... so far anyway(prob. not one called KMA either, though it's a little more likely.... 
)------ This thread is Archived ------
JimNastics: Surely, there must be some programming language that would eliminate a forum thread being brought back to the top of the heap, if the same person posted a comment twice (or more) in a row.
Currently, ANY comment by ANYONE brings a thread to the top, even if it is the same person...over and over and over... again.
This has been manipulated by several flooding offenders to the extreme extent.
Alternatively, automatic post blocking, so that the same commentor can't post twice in a row on the same forum thread would also be a (somewhat less favorable) solution.
Both have been done on some other sites, so I KNOW it is possible.
What?Currently, ANY comment by ANYONE brings a thread to the top, even if it is the same person...over and over and over... again.
This has been manipulated by several flooding offenders to the extreme extent.
Alternatively, automatic post blocking, so that the same commentor can't post twice in a row on the same forum thread would also be a (somewhat less favorable) solution.
Both have been done on some other sites, so I KNOW it is possible.
------ This thread is Archived ------
JAN_is: Is it really such a problem? It doesn´t happen too often that someone keeps on commenting over and over just to bring the thread back up.
Sometimes people post a thread then for valid reasons are unable to respond immediately. I know many long standing members who go back into their thread some time later and respond to each individual comment made in their absence. I don´t see anything wrong with that, it´s just being polite.
In my opinion forum flooders are those who make several inane threads and rarely make more than one or two posts in them. It´s all the rest who keep these silly threads going on and on.
Sometimes people post a thread then for valid reasons are unable to respond immediately. I know many long standing members who go back into their thread some time later and respond to each individual comment made in their absence. I don´t see anything wrong with that, it´s just being polite.
In my opinion forum flooders are those who make several inane threads and rarely make more than one or two posts in them. It´s all the rest who keep these silly threads going on and on.
------ This thread is Archived ------
SCatlyn: LOL- I don't think there's a town anywhere in the U.S. with the name Obama in it... so far anyway(prob. not one called KMA either, though it's a little more likely.... )
I could say I'm from Atlanta Georgia...when in fact I'm from a foreign country.
------ This thread is Archived ------
demonfairy: are you really from obamaville,Indiana..
obamaville= homeless under a bridge
------ This thread is Archived ------
oops last post in this thread for awhile, It will make the other ones sink 
------ This thread is Archived ------
JimNastics: Surely, there must be some programming language that would eliminate a forum thread being brought back to the top of the heap, if the same person posted a comment twice (or more) in a row.
Currently, ANY comment by ANYONE brings a thread to the top, even if it is the same person...over and over and over... again.
This has been manipulated by several flooding offenders to the extreme extent.
Alternatively, automatic post blocking, so that the same commentor can't post twice in a row on the same forum thread would also be a (somewhat less favorable) solution.
Both have been done on some other sites, so I KNOW it is possible.
Currently, ANY comment by ANYONE brings a thread to the top, even if it is the same person...over and over and over... again.
This has been manipulated by several flooding offenders to the extreme extent.
Alternatively, automatic post blocking, so that the same commentor can't post twice in a row on the same forum thread would also be a (somewhat less favorable) solution.
Both have been done on some other sites, so I KNOW it is possible.
I think that there is a case for the more serious threads (presuming that they are posted in the correct section)to have a posting restriction of,say 2 or 3 in every 10 posts.This would prevent highjacking by flirting and chit chat,or at least discourage it.I have noticed "Bump" being used often recently to remove someones post from the view page.I find it quite a manipulative gesture.
------ This thread is Archived ------
why would you want to stop flirting and chit chat?
Its all part of the fun i thought?
Rather sad to think that it would be a problem to some?
Its all part of the fun i thought?
Rather sad to think that it would be a problem to some?
------ This thread is Archived ------
SCatlyn: You discovered that, too!
(But I would know it was you... b/c you're not A & O -annoying & obnoxious- IMO ......plus, you'd probably be tempted to say you're from OMyA or KMyO, Georgia.... so I'd know absolutely for sure! )
(But I would know it was you... b/c you're not A & O -annoying & obnoxious- IMO ......plus, you'd probably be tempted to say you're from OMyA or KMyO, Georgia.... so I'd know absolutely for sure! )
your calling someone else annoying, thanks for the laugh mrs. spellcheck ------ This thread is Archived ------
it iseasy to et rules, but then you need a task force to implemet them.
In a short black out in New York, the whole town wasrobbed
In a short black out in New York, the whole town wasrobbed
------ This thread is Archived ------
AJ12345: your calling someone else annoying, thanks for the laugh mrs. spellcheck
You need to lay off,Fellow!------ This thread is Archived ------
demonfairy: are you really from obamaville,Indiana..
Imagine if it were BIDEN-VILE,Indiana!------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Imagine if it were BIDEN-VILLE,Indiana!
Sorry for the Blooper!------ This thread is Archived ------
I have a friendly suggestion for the site.Why not make it easier for people to communicate then there may not be all these misunderstanding of someone which is posted.Maybe by installing cams or something similar.
I know how sometimes someones comments can be taken the wrong way from which it was intended.
I know how sometimes someones comments can be taken the wrong way from which it was intended.
------ This thread is Archived ------
AJ12345: why??? they certainly don't
Thin Ice,Fellow!
------ This thread is Archived ------
AJ12345: yes because it really matters
SO it's ok to lie?
It's everbody elses fault for not going along?
Yea, that makes sense.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ocee35: SO it's ok to lie?It's everbody elses fault for not going along?
Yea, that makes sense.
Yea, that makes sense.
it depends, everyone lies, have you ever taken a sick day off work when you werent sick??? everyone is acting as if she was a scammer who scammed them out of millions of dollars.
and for the not going along button, there is such a thing as ignoring someone, and if you dont want to ignore someone, you have a right to make your point but you dont have to do it in a aggressive or insulting manner
------ This thread is Archived ------
AJ12345: it depends, everyone lies, have you ever taken a sick day off work when you werent sick??? everyone is acting as if she was a scammer who scammed them out of millions of dollars.
and for the not going along button, there is such a thing as ignoring someone, and if you dont want to ignore someone, you have a right to make your point but you dont have to do it in a aggressive or insulting manner
and for the not going along button, there is such a thing as ignoring someone, and if you dont want to ignore someone, you have a right to make your point but you dont have to do it in a aggressive or insulting manner
I did ignore it, I didn't want to be bother with it at all,
until people started in on the folks that chose to speak up.
If the people claiming we should just let things slide,,,
would stfu and let it slide, the conversation
would be over already.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ocee35: I did ignore it, I didn't want to be bother with it at all,
until people started in on the folks that chose to speak up.
If the people claiming we should just let things slide,,,
would stfu and let it slide, the conversation
would be over already.
until people started in on the folks that chose to speak up.
If the people claiming we should just let things slide,,,
would stfu and let it slide, the conversation
would be over already.
fair enough
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Common Issues with the BMW X1
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
1830's Music
rarotonga
Nature
everything is changing
Reality Check
Icebergs Still Around
Salami, Salami, Baloney
How far is too far?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).