America the Free???? ( Archived) (581)

I was beginning to wonder how long it would be that we move from the practical to the ridiculous...beards as "a sign of faith."
The jails and courts will be crowded with the (tens?) thousands of men wearing beards...including all of 'les clochards'(hobos) that sleep under the bridges, the vagabonds that roam the countryside, the musicians, especially the Jazz and Classical players; the list could be endless...forget the tens of thousands, let's go for the millions!
Then we must not forget that many will have to be hired by the Govt. to question all those detained for having beards, and the ones who will, naturally, refuse to shave, if they indeed are men "of faith" and if so, which faith(as if we all don't know; just more State sanctioned insulting discrimination against Muslims. Which makes the positions of the Rabbinical Jews and all the Rabbis a very volatile problem that could have a nasty impact on this moronic comedy. No one gets paid, it seems, to think things through.
I wonder what will be chosen next...perhaps the wearing of a crucifix around one's neck; another insult to the spirit of egalitarian France; turbans that the Sikhs wear, perhaps 'deadlocks' worn by the Rastas...or even smoking some ganja weed as that is alleged to be an 'article of faith' by the Rastafarians... Hey, how about those diapers that Hindu men wear...squads of Gendarmes will pounce on any poor Hindu this summer merely going to his temple; hell, the streets of Paris will be in chaos with all the hordes of Gendarmes chasing after people for having any type of visible article "considered a sign of faith"...
Could there be something that people in France can wear or carry that could be considered an article of no faith?? And of so, when would enough people wearing 'it' then become an article of faith in having no faith?????? If one million French people, including tourists, of course, wore something as a sign of having no faith, they would be saying that they do, in fact, have faith in their not having faith so as to be arrested or fined for having...ahhhh, don;t you just love political and legal logic...makes our lives so much more 'entertaining'...

I'm not surprised there wasn't a comment on this Anon.


the wiki link




Man those Edwards had deep lizard loins.

A school told a child to remove a Christian cross she was wearing even though it lets Sikh children wear bangles as part of their religion.
Lauren Grimshaw-Brown was told to take off a necklace with a cross on it because of health and safety fears.


Read more:


.

Read the constitution. It doesn't say representatives, it says "the people" have rights.

You know why it doesn't say 'representatives have rights'. Because representatives are the occupying power as you put it..


go back to sleep

Ever get the feeling sometimes that one is being interigated.

I told you about the nay sayers now.
I felt that way the other day when I brought up the pilot who flew the boeing.

If they felt like they were being represented... they would not be willing to go to jail to say they weren't.



Making a law that forces people to obtain a permit to protest, or demonstrate, is unconstitutional, and illegal; it abridges the right of the people to have "Freedom of Speech," and to "Peaceably assemble, and petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.






Thank you for making it clear that you are defending the actions of an "Occupying Force."




.

Better read article one in which the constitution describes the congress, executive and the legislative body and how they are placed in the position to run the country. You know, the people that make laws you don't like.

It also describes what you can do when there is a law you don't like so that you don't have to resort to breaking numerous laws in order to attract attention to yourself.



Better have a look at article one as you're really coming off as uninformed here.

Oh, and you compared the Boston tea Party to the dancers, ludicrous. As I said, the British were taxing the hell out of the US people without giving them a vote. The dancers all have votes. All they have to do is to apply them properly.

Yep it's the coming wave of godocracy. I prefer to call them an 'assembly' of mini-me's. I guess they have rights too though. And if you use the constitution to show them how wrong they are they'll call you anti american. Go figure.

Can you now back this statement up with the writs they have mkade and the names of congressional leaders they have contacted along with meetings they have conducted with same or are you just shooting blind here?




Supreme court has allowed it. You know the Supreme Court don't you?


Thank you for making it clear that you are defending the actions of an "Occupying Force."

.

You quote the constitution and now say it is void. make up your mind for crying out loud.