America the Free???? (581)
Albertaghost: Can you now back this statement up with the writs they have mkade and the names of congressional leaders they have contacted along with meetings they have conducted with same or are you just shooting blind here?
I saw one of them wearing a Code Pink T-shirt..
Code Pink is a group of anti war protesters, which was begun by grandmothers.
I have worked with Code Pink; I have helped do research for their protests, I have protested with them, and gone to jail for taking pictures of the police harassing little old ladies.
If you look up the story online... you will see that the last guy arrested was a veteran war protester.
If you look at the video... the officer was not against them dancing at first, but against their demonstrating.
.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Albertaghost: Better read article one in which the constitution describes the congress, executive and the legislative body and how they are placed in the position to run the country. You know, the people that make laws you don't like.
Red herring, straw man. How the gov is constructed is irrelevant to the people's rights. I know you have a million of these tangential things to say but they're moot IN context.
In response to:
It also describes what you can do when there is a law you don't like so that you don't have to resort to breaking numerous laws in order to attract attention to yourself.
Better have a look at article one as you're really coming off as uninformed here.
It also describes what you can do when there is a law you don't like so that you don't have to resort to breaking numerous laws in order to attract attention to yourself.
Better have a look at article one as you're really coming off as uninformed here.
They broke no laws, yet you say numerous! What a trip. Talk about uninformed. Defending your rights is not law breaking.
In response to:
Oh, and you compared the Boston tea Party to the dancers, ludicrous. As I said, the British were taxing the hell out of the US people without giving them a vote. The dancers all have votes. All they have to do is to apply them properly.
Oh, and you compared the Boston tea Party to the dancers, ludicrous. As I said, the British were taxing the hell out of the US people without giving them a vote. The dancers all have votes. All they have to do is to apply them properly.
Wrong. (for about the 99th time but who's counting lol) I did not. That was Anon who brought that up. This is how badly you are unable to follow the discussion. You're only recourse is to recuse, grab posts out of context and manipulate facts from the dust of mis comprehension.
------ This thread is Archived ------
anonymous1: I made a mistake.Thank you for making it clear, you are defending the actions of an "Occupying Power."
.
.
Occupying power legal definition of Occupying power. Occupying ...
Military occupation occurs when a belligerent state invades the territory of another state with the intention of holding the territory at least temporarily. ...
.
------ This thread is Archived ------
anonymous1: I saw one of them wearing a Code Pink T-shirt..
Code Pink is a group of anti war protesters, which was begun by grandmothers.
I have worked with Code Pink; I have helped do research for their protests, I have protested with them, and gone to jail for taking pictures of the police harassing little old ladies.If you look up the story online... you will see that the last guy arrested was a veteran war protester.If you look at the video... the officer was not against them dancing at first, but against their demonstrating.
.
Code Pink is a group of anti war protesters, which was begun by grandmothers.
I have worked with Code Pink; I have helped do research for their protests, I have protested with them, and gone to jail for taking pictures of the police harassing little old ladies.If you look up the story online... you will see that the last guy arrested was a veteran war protester.If you look at the video... the officer was not against them dancing at first, but against their demonstrating.
.
Inside the hall and they were told to take it out of there
------ This thread is Archived ------
BB_snickers: Red herring, straw man. How the gov is constructed is irrelevant to the people's rights. I know you have a million of these tangential things to say but they're moot IN context.
They broke no laws, yet you say numerous! What a trip. Talk about uninformed. Defending your rights is not law breaking.
Wrong. (for about the 99th time but who's counting lol) I did not. That was Anon who brought that up. This is how badly you are unable to follow the discussion. You're only recourse is to recuse, grab posts out of context and manipulate facts from the dust of mis comprehension.
Defending WHAT Right!They broke no laws, yet you say numerous! What a trip. Talk about uninformed. Defending your rights is not law breaking.
Wrong. (for about the 99th time but who's counting lol) I did not. That was Anon who brought that up. This is how badly you are unable to follow the discussion. You're only recourse is to recuse, grab posts out of context and manipulate facts from the dust of mis comprehension.
To be a Public Annoyance?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among (Crown Relatives) Men, deriving their just powers from (Manipulating Elections) the consent of the governed, Actually it can be found in The Declaration Of Independence!
They're both great documents that have been abrogated Conrad.
Did you read the link on Presidential Relatives?
A long time ago I came across a document that showed genealogical heritage as far back as King David. I can't recall where I found it; but the wiki link is scary enough for anyone who thinks they're under the the governance of 'elected' rather than 'chosen' people.
------ This thread is Archived ------
BB_snickers: They're both great documents that have been abrogated Conrad.
Did you read the link on Presidential Relatives?
A long time ago I came across a document that showed genealogical heritage as far back as King David. I can't recall where I found it; but the wiki link is scary enough for anyone who thinks they're under the the governance of 'elected' rather than 'chosen' people.
Ref. David Icke!Did you read the link on Presidential Relatives?
A long time ago I came across a document that showed genealogical heritage as far back as King David. I can't recall where I found it; but the wiki link is scary enough for anyone who thinks they're under the the governance of 'elected' rather than 'chosen' people.
You ought to be scared alright!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Defending WHAT Right!
To be a Public Annoyance?
To be a Public Annoyance?
Look at the crowd. No one is annoyed or even upset until the 3rd Reich decides they don't have to answer to legalities, much less 'rights' and begin pinning people down in disregard of the constitution.
If you personally are annoyed ... well .... I suggest you take some dance lessons, it really is fun.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Ref. David Icke!
You ought to be scared alright!
You ought to be scared alright!
Only if you are either a reptile, perhaps even a 'lounge lizard' and/or have reptile dysfunction...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Ref. David Icke!
You ought to be scared alright!
You ought to be scared alright!
I know logical fallacies are your specialty.
But the proof stands alone, no matter who you use to attempt to demean or denounce it's legitimacy.
Maybe you're related.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Albertaghost: Let's see, in the recent past you have personally insulted and attacked those who would post facts to counter your contention that the US government themselves conducted the WTC attacks, dancing at memorials is legal despite it being by law illegal and that despite being shown that the attack on Bin Laden was legal according to UN Charter, you contend that it was illegal. In these threads, you insulted all those who countered your anti American hubris and here, you even refer to the US as terrorists, bullies and right wing Christian bullet heads.
Seems you are projecting a bit.
"Although it is not true that all conservatives are terrorists, it is true that most terrorists are conservatives." Tweet after the Toucson Shooting
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
bohemianjack: Seems you are projecting a bit.
He'll be alright when he gets a grip on his auto responsive coping mechanisms.
He does actually contribute some stuff once in a while even if it is straw man mostly. There's always something to learn.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Bane6: Inside the hall and they were told to take it out of there
If everybody did what they were told, we'd still have Jim Crow laws.... and the USA, would be called a British colony.
.
------ This thread is Archived ------
anonymous1: A school told a child to remove a Christian cross she was wearing even though it lets Sikh children wear bangles as part of their religion.
Lauren Grimshaw-Brown was told to take off a necklace with a cross on it because of health and safety fears.Read more:
Lauren Grimshaw-Brown was told to take off a necklace with a cross on it because of health and safety fears.Read more:
England...why am I not surprised; but it is a matter of perspective isn't it; being shown just how far things will be permitted to go is a good warning for those who oppose this insanity; it brings it all out in public for all to see. Now, it is up to those who are adamant in their opposition to put a bit of sanity back into the equation; target the people responsible for this outrage...however best deals with the situation, I leave to those involved, but the longer it is allowed to go on, the harder it will be to stop and stop once and for all. The State exists to serve the people, not the other way around.
------ This thread is Archived ------
venusenvy:
I re-choreographed your dance step. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
solitare: England...why am I not surprised; but it is a matter of perspective isn't it; being shown just how far things will be permitted to go is a good warning for those who oppose this insanity; it brings it all out in public for all to see. Now, it is up to those who are adamant in their opposition to put a bit of sanity back into the equation; target the people responsible for this outrage...however best deals with the situation, I leave to those involved, but the longer it is allowed to go on, the harder it will be to stop and stop once and for all.
The State exists to serve the people, not the other way around.
The State exists to serve the people, not the other way around.
.
------ This thread is Archived ------
anonymous1: If everybody did what they were told, we'd still have Jim Crow laws.... and the USA, would be called a British colony.
.
.
And if nobody did what they were told, we'd have cars crunched and piled up at every intersection in twisted rubble, trains wouldn't run, planes wouldn't fly, our society would collapse and we'd live in a madhouse full of idiots starving to death while snarling at each other that they'll do what the hell they want.
Maybe somewhere in the middle is a sane world where people respect each other to some nominal degree and standards of acceptible behavior are understood and followed.
------ This thread is Archived ------
gardenhackle: And if nobody did what they were told, we'd have cars crunched and piled up at every intersection in twisted rubble, trains wouldn't run, planes wouldn't fly, our society would collapse and we'd live in a madhouse full of idiots starving to death while snarling at each other that they'll do what the hell they want.
Maybe somewhere in the middle is a sane world where people respect each other to some nominal degree and standards of acceptible behavior are understood and followed.
Maybe somewhere in the middle is a sane world where people respect each other to some nominal degree and standards of acceptible behavior are understood and followed.
No differant in any country.Stop the police working for one day,and just see what happens.------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Ladies
Unions support Democrats!
Feel Good Music
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
Sleepy Don!
men's perspective towards women
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
The Best of the GOP
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
The weird and the random facts around the world
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Can you now back this statement up with the writs they have made and the names of congressional leaders they have contacted along with meetings they have conducted with same or are you just shooting blind here?
Supreme court has allowed it. You know the Supreme Court don't you?
.
You quote the constitution and now say it is void. make up your mind for crying out loud.