Why the delusional don't like youtube (23)
RayfromUSA: In a fair fight truth will win out over delusion every time.
So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".
Ya what he said :)while adding the closest thing to absolute truth is not what your told.So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".
Often coincidences are not coincidental either.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Chatonlyman: ... Often coincidences are not coincidental either.
Right, especially when they are officially declared to be coincidences.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: Right, especially when they are officially declared to be coincidences.
I figure in the last 50 years there must be one consiracy thery that is a conspiracy. It sure is hard to figure out which one.------ This thread is Archived ------
Chatonlyman: I figure in the last 50 years there must be one consiracy theory that is a conspiracy. It sure is hard to figure out which one.
It's the big one that incorporates all the others.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA:
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
and why is that?
you've used the term here, so which category did you place yourself in?
------ This thread is Archived ------
jono7: and why is that?
you've used the term here, so which category did you place yourself in?
I think what he is saying is do you believe a consiracy exists or has existed or not. The 2 catagories. I could be wrong here but...:)you've used the term here, so which category did you place yourself in?
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: In a fair fight truth will win out over delusion every time.
So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".
So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".
Socrates is back.
------ This thread is Archived ------
BB_snickers: Socrates is back.
Ahh were all entitled to our opinion.------ This thread is Archived ------
We should be very careful .... lets whisper and walk on our tiptoe
the conspiracy theorists are out there and we could get infected very easy ,unless you`ve been vaccinated ...
the conspiracy theorists are out there and we could get infected very easy ,unless you`ve been vaccinated ...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Chatonlyman: I think what he is saying is do you believe a consiracy exists or has existed or not. The 2 catagories. I could be wrong here but...:)
thank you. it's a bit confusing, how the OP has stated 'those' categories.
they do exist, and folks do think about them...
or we wouldn't be having this discussion would we?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: We should be very careful .... lets whisper and walk on our tiptoe
the conspiracy theorists are out there and we could get infected very easy ,unless you`ve been vaccinated ...
the conspiracy theorists are out there and we could get infected very easy ,unless you`ve been vaccinated ...
uh oh! vaccination conspiracy...
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: In a fair fight truth will win out over delusion every time.
So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".
So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".
Excellent. Well said Ray. However I seriously doubt that most 'sheeple' have the mental agility to analyze and compare...thinking gives many headaches; far easier to take their daily 'Soma'...
( I rather like that 'deluders/deludees...gotta be a song in that somewhere!
)------ This thread is Archived ------
Chatonlyman: Ahh were all entitled to our opinion.
Socrates wasn't concerned with opinion, though that was just Platos opinion about his method.
------ This thread is Archived ------
solitare: I rather like that 'deluders/deludees...gotta be a song in that somewhere!
And did you catch the part about their puny dysfunctional fallacies (phali-cies)?
I think the ghost of Shakespeare helped me on that one.
------ This thread is Archived ------
BB_snickers: Socrates wasn't concerned with opinion, though that was just Platos opinion about his method.
Socrates? Bah, Hemlock!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
OP: "Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories."
Well, I'll respond since you're cute.
If you notice in my post, I put the words "conspiracy theorist" between quotation marks. ("__").
Such marks have several different usages but in general they serve to indicate that the words between them should not be attributed to the writer (in this case to me) but to others who are being "quoted".
I never refer to anybody as a "conspiracy theorist" because I feel that the term for human beings "homo-sapiens" refers only to beings with enough common sense to continually critically analyze everything they are told. Especially information from authoritarian sources such as government and media.
Those who fail to do are certainly not "thinking men" but belong to a similar-looking species of walking vegetable. Homo-ovisaries.
jono7: and why is that?
You've used the term here, so which category did you place yourself in?
You've used the term here, so which category did you place yourself in?
Well, I'll respond since you're cute.
If you notice in my post, I put the words "conspiracy theorist" between quotation marks. ("__").
Such marks have several different usages but in general they serve to indicate that the words between them should not be attributed to the writer (in this case to me) but to others who are being "quoted".
I never refer to anybody as a "conspiracy theorist" because I feel that the term for human beings "homo-sapiens" refers only to beings with enough common sense to continually critically analyze everything they are told. Especially information from authoritarian sources such as government and media.
Those who fail to do are certainly not "thinking men" but belong to a similar-looking species of walking vegetable. Homo-ovisaries.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: We should be very careful .... lets whisper and walk on our tiptoe
the conspiracy theorists are out there and we could get infected very easy ,unless you`ve been vaccinated ...
the conspiracy theorists are out there and we could get infected very easy ,unless you`ve been vaccinated ...
It's too late to avoid infection.
We've all been exposed.
And we've all spent some time deluded in the matrix.
But we can wake up to reality by proper mental hygiene and exercise. And by taking the red pill, the one that opens our eyes to the truth instead of the more appealing delusion.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Chatonlyman: I figure in the last 50 years there must be one consiracy thery that is a conspiracy. It sure is hard to figure out which one.
The thing that always amazes me about conspiracy theories is how elaborate they are, how flimsy alleged links are, and the enormous lengths people will go to trying to prove that a conspiracy actually happened.
And woe betide anyone who points out any huge gaping holes in the theory, they must be part of the conspiracy or have brainwashed.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: I am baffled by the brilliance of your misunderstanding.
very good , I like it . If I can't have it , can I at least use it ------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
Why is this shameful?
men's perspective towards women
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
wanting beyond need
Unions support Democrats!
Ladies
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
2,535 Views
22 Comments
Created: Jul 2012
Last Viewed: Apr 27
Last Commented: Aug 2012
0 Likes
Related Forums
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
- Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- Why is this shameful?
- men's perspective towards women
- Would you hire this guy - for any job?
- wanting beyond need
- Unions support Democrats!
- Ladies
So those who prefer delusion (whether they be deluders or deludees) always avoid exposing their fallacies to any sort of comparative analysis. Their fallacies are puny and dysfunctional compared to the truth.
As some have stated elsewhere, youtube is but a medium.
One can find both truth and ridiculous fiction on youtube.
But the same thing is true for a public library, advertising, or life in general.
The buyer must always beware.
Because there are liars out there with a vested interest in deceiving others.
And there are idiots who prefer lies because the truth scares them.
Anyone who even uses the term "conspiracy theorists" falls into one of those categories.
The search for truth must be continuous and it must never just take the "official" explanation for granted. Especially when the voice of authority is telling us to pay no attention to what is going on behind the curtain.
In the case of big events with political ramifications there is a very strong chance that the official government explanation is politically motivated. There is even a strong chance that the event may have been perpetrated by someone other than the one being blamed for the express purpose of affecting public opinion and justifying some sort of action that the public wouldn't support if not outraged by the event.
The controlled media will only offer a limited selection of very similar versions of the official lie.
Youtube and the internet in general however offer an unlimited number of widely varied viewpoints.
It still falls to the individual to compare and reason and connect the dots and to arrive at what he or she considers to be the most probable truth. (realizing that even that "theory" must be left open to revision or replacement as time goes by).
People who don't analyze and compare various theories are sure to be duped.
Critically analyzing and comparing theories is called the "scientific method".
Unquestioning acceptance of official claims diffused by governments and the controlled corporate media is called "thought control".