Narrow Minded vs Personal Preference? (69)
fast_and_furiousTipp, Tipperary Ireland58 Threads 1 Polls 1,394 Postsfifitheminx: so u keep saying....at the end of a thread...
Not my fault if u cant pic it up. Oh wait I have an idea. Every statement or thing I'll say I'll follow it with "guys I was serious there or guys I was joking there" 
fifitheminx: so u keep saying....at the end of a thread...
I know. He hasn't realised he's talking to an indoctrinated brick wall yet
fast_and_furious: Not my fault if u cant pic it up. Oh wait I have an idea. Every statement or thing I'll say I'll follow it with "guys I was serious there or guys I was joking there"
not my fault i dont fall for ur back tracking u mean.
facetowardsfront: I know. He hasn't realised he's talking to an indoctrinated brick wall yet
Says the man who is afraid to debate me as I would tear him to pieces.....so much so that he BANNED me from the This is Feminism thread!!!
He is a coward.
fifitheminx: not my fault i dont fall for ur back tracking u mean.
Lol back tracking? Lol if i say something here I follow tru with it. I just got a memory flash of the cheeky pinch on bum in nightclub and the responses it got Wait, don't even go there again fast_and_furious: Dont tell jokes about serious topics
Yes we do. We joke about everything. It's how we deal with trauma. We hear jokes about all sorts of serious issues all the time. Think about it.
fast_and_furious: Lol back tracking? Lol if i say something here I follow tru with it. I just got a memory flash of the cheeky pinch on bum in nightclub and the responses it got Wait, don't even go there again
off to have nommy stew....have fun..
facetowardsfront: Yes we do. We joke about everything. It's how we deal with trauma. We hear jokes about all sorts of serious issues all the time. Think about it.
Do we? Wait your right I just taut yes we dosofarsogood74: He has no sense of humour when it comes to women. He is bitter and twisted when it comes to them. Every thread he gets involved in he tries to turn it into an anti woman thing. He even tried to use the death of a child in the thread about social workers failing to get his bitter twisted views across.
The man is just scum really.
The man is just scum really.
Actually he hasnt said any such thing to twist veiws on MY thread
He merely gave a link and a comment on an article which was justified ...
Had the Social workers been properly trained and professional they might of given the child to the Father and Maybe just maybe this poor young boy would still be alive ..
whitepaws: Actually he hasnt said any such thing to twist veiws on MY thread
He merely gave a link and a comment on an article which was justified ...
Had the Social workers been properly trained and professional they might of given the child to the Father and Maybe just maybe this poor young boy would still be alive ..
He merely gave a link and a comment on an article which was justified ...
Had the Social workers been properly trained and professional they might of given the child to the Father and Maybe just maybe this poor young boy would still be alive ..
He said exactly "Ah the picture was clear enough from the get go. Daddy thrown out. Social workers give court report showing children safer with mum even if she has 'issues'"
He was taking a tragic case and situation and using it to spread his vile anti woman views!
MADDOG69: So I was talking to a wan over the weekend just gone. Things were going grand. During the course of the banter she asked me what religion I was. Without answering, I said 'Does it matter??'. She said 'It does'. With some annoyance I said I was Catholic (as was she). And then I went on to ask her what if I said I was some other religion, as in Anglican, or Methodist or whatever?? I can't remember the words she used, but I'm pretty sure she indicated it would be a deal breaker. Anyway, I didn't like that.
So... my question is, is this a reasonable preference to have regarding the religion one was born into? Make note that no such questions were asked regarding actual Maas attendance, or whether I even really believed in the Roman Catholic God. I gathered, it was more to do with the general background I was from.
Is it right that I judge her harshly on this? Is it right to assume that they'll be narrow minded problems on a whole other range of issues down the line? If she ticked every other box, is this a deal breaker? Especially in this country with it's not so rosey past with Sectarianism, her attitude did not sit well with me at all.
I think I know the answers already. Just pisses me off...
I think if she is religous she should understand its all one god,she sounds way to picky,walk on by.So... my question is, is this a reasonable preference to have regarding the religion one was born into? Make note that no such questions were asked regarding actual Maas attendance, or whether I even really believed in the Roman Catholic God. I gathered, it was more to do with the general background I was from.
Is it right that I judge her harshly on this? Is it right to assume that they'll be narrow minded problems on a whole other range of issues down the line? If she ticked every other box, is this a deal breaker? Especially in this country with it's not so rosey past with Sectarianism, her attitude did not sit well with me at all.
I think I know the answers already. Just pisses me off...
sofarsogood74: He said exactly "Ah the picture was clear enough from the get go. Daddy thrown out. Social workers give court report showing children safer with mum even if she has 'issues'"
He was taking a tragic case and situation and using it to spread his vile anti woman views!
He was taking a tragic case and situation and using it to spread his vile anti woman views!
NO its YOU that is twisting a comment to try to gain a moral upper hand...
he gave a opinion which was very mild and provided a link from a decent enough paper to back up his comment .
whitepaws: I will say this once .....for your own benefit and hopefully you may see that the whole world is not against you ..
You both have rubbed each other up (non gayly) to an extent that only bitterness wins ......why not just not comment on any of his links and him vica versa and move on
You both have rubbed each other up (non gayly) to an extent that only bitterness wins ......why not just not comment on any of his links and him vica versa and move on
And I will say this to you nicely. You said I twisted what he sid. His exact words were "Ah the picture was clear enough from the get go. Daddy thrown out. Social workers give court report showing children safer with mum even if she has 'issues'"!
Now he has made two huge statements there. Can you tell me where it says either of them things in that article????
Otherwise anyone with a brain could see he is actually using the story to try to claim that the courts were biased towards the woman and then this tragic accident happened! We dont even know what happened between the parents, we dont know if there was a court case, we dont know if the father wanted custody.
So I am right and you sir are wrong!
sofarsogood74: And I will say this to you nicely. You said I twisted what he sid. His exact words were "Ah the picture was clear enough from the get go. Daddy thrown out. Social workers give court report showing children safer with mum even if she has 'issues'"!
Now he has made two huge statements there. Can you tell me where it says either of them things in that article????
Otherwise anyone with a brain could see he is actually using the story to try to claim that the courts were biased towards the woman and then this tragic accident happened! We dont even know what happened between the parents, we dont know if there was a court case, we dont know if the father wanted custody.
So I am right and you sir are wrong!
Now he has made two huge statements there. Can you tell me where it says either of them things in that article????
Otherwise anyone with a brain could see he is actually using the story to try to claim that the courts were biased towards the woman and then this tragic accident happened! We dont even know what happened between the parents, we dont know if there was a court case, we dont know if the father wanted custody.
So I am right and you sir are wrong!
Very well you have pointed out a partial flaw in my posting.
But heres how my Assumption is thus far
.1: The Father was too distressed to speak and lives 3 km down the road This strongly suggests daddy was thrown out
2 An uncle quoted "I am Anthony's uncle -- I want to say that there was HSE involvement and child-protection services involvement with Anthony before he died.This Proves that the kids wernt safe with Mum
I think its fair to Assume that as the courts take the side of the Mother and so do Social workers no matter what ...that his posting was a fair comment
whitepaws: Very well you have pointed out a partial flaw in my posting.
But heres how my Assumption is thus far
.1: The Father was too distressed to speak and lives 3 km down the road This strongly suggests daddy was thrown out
But heres how my Assumption is thus far
.1: The Father was too distressed to speak and lives 3 km down the road This strongly suggests daddy was thrown out
No it doesn't!!!! The afther could have left or ran off with another woman!! He would still be distressed that his child is dead! That is just a stupid comment!!
whitepaws: 2 An uncle quoted "I am Anthony's uncle -- I want to say that there was HSE involvement and child-protection services involvement with Anthony before he died.This Proves that the kids wernt safe with Mum
It proves the kids were at risk! It does not prove the dad wanted custody, asked for custody or went to court for custody!!!
whitepaws: I think its fair to Assume that as the courts take the side of the Mother and so do Social workers no matter what ...that his posting was a fair comment
I dont think it is fair to assume anything in this case. We dont know if there even was a court case!!! We dont know what the report said if there was a report. We dont know if the father wanted the kids living with him so we dont know what choices were open to the social workers. We dont know a lot!
He made a statement to try and say the courts were biased towards the mother and this tragic case happened. This was a statement taht he completly made up. No facts at all to back it up. We dont even know if there was a court case!!!!!
He also says the father wasthrown out. Another fact he made up. We dont know if the father left, was thrown out, was asked to leave by social services...But again he decided to make up a fact to try to put across his anti woman views!
MD....I would date someone would a similiar religion to my own, albeit that I am a non practising one. Dated a mormon for a while.....and the differences there just wouldnt have worked out long term.
Im with fifi on this one......as friends yes, I dont care what religion my friends are......as a partner, it'd need to be pretty similar.
Im with fifi on this one......as friends yes, I dont care what religion my friends are......as a partner, it'd need to be pretty similar.
sofarsogood74: No it doesn't!!!! The afther could have left or ran off with another woman!! He would still be distressed that his child is dead! That is just a stupid comment!!
It proves the kids were at risk! It does not prove the dad wanted custody, asked for custody or went to court for custody!!!
I dont think it is fair to assume anything in this case. We dont know if there even was a court case!!! We dont know what the report said if there was a report. We dont know if the father wanted the kids living with him so we dont know what choices were open to the social workers. We dont know a lot!
He made a statement to try and say the courts were biased towards the mother and this tragic case happened. This was a statement taht he completly made up. No facts at all to back it up. We dont even know if there was a court case!!!!!
He also says the father wasthrown out. Another fact he made up. We dont know if the father left, was thrown out, was asked to leave by social services...But again he decided to make up a fact to try to put across his anti woman views!
It proves the kids were at risk! It does not prove the dad wanted custody, asked for custody or went to court for custody!!!
I dont think it is fair to assume anything in this case. We dont know if there even was a court case!!! We dont know what the report said if there was a report. We dont know if the father wanted the kids living with him so we dont know what choices were open to the social workers. We dont know a lot!
He made a statement to try and say the courts were biased towards the mother and this tragic case happened. This was a statement taht he completly made up. No facts at all to back it up. We dont even know if there was a court case!!!!!
He also says the father wasthrown out. Another fact he made up. We dont know if the father left, was thrown out, was asked to leave by social services...But again he decided to make up a fact to try to put across his anti woman views!
now as i have said for myself not face ,that My Assumption is as i quoted ......
I will go a step further ...I assume that the Father who rightly is well distressed loved his son
From this I will assume he would, like any Parent (this is Mothers and Fathers) would prefer that the Child/ren live with them if they split up .Now Unfortunately Social workers or child protection workers or case workers when they try to de-humanise their work ALWAYS give the child/ren to the mother ...This i know as FACT .
Now they try to put a home help of family support people into help Yes the Mothers as they have removed the children from the Fathers and sometimes this works and sometimes it doesnt ..
Based on the paper article...based on the current system in place and based on the past judgements it is more than fair to ASSUME from my pont of view that faces mild comments can be justified ....
whitepaws: now as i have said for myself not face ,that My Assumption is as i quoted ......
I will go a step further ...I assume that the Father who rightly is well distressed loved his son From this I will assume he would, like any Parent (this is Mothers and Fathers) would prefer that the Child/ren live with them if they split up .....
I will go a step further ...I assume that the Father who rightly is well distressed loved his son From this I will assume he would, like any Parent (this is Mothers and Fathers) would prefer that the Child/ren live with them if they split up .....
You can assume what you want. You can assume Aliens exist...its not proof! This discussion started when you said I twisted faces comment. I proved to you that I twised nothing. He made up complete lies. He never said he was assuming anything. He stated the father was thrown out and the courts favoured the mother. This without a shred of proof that there even was a cort case or why the parents were living seperately!!!
whitepaws: Now Unfortunately Social workers or child protection workers or case workers when they try to de-humanise their work ALWAYS give the child/ren to the mother ...This i know as FACT .....
Thats not a fact. If the mother has mental heath issues, has addiction issues she may not get the kids. But again you are asSuming the father wanted custody!!! The tradition of the family would suggest the father would not rear kids!
whitepaws: Now they try to put a home help of family support people into help Yes the Mothers as they have removed the children from the Fathers and sometimes this works and sometimes it doesnt ..
Based on the paper article...based on the current system in place and based on the past judgements it is more than fair to ASSUME from my pont of view that faces mild comments can be justified ....
Based on the paper article...based on the current system in place and based on the past judgements it is more than fair to ASSUME from my pont of view that faces mild comments can be justified ....
Its not fair to assume anything. No matter how many caps you use. You dont know the facts of the case!!
And as I said this discussion started when you said I twisted what face said. He said the fater was thrown out like it was fact and the courts favoured the mother like it was fact. This was to try and ram home his anti women view. This was sick in my opinion. There is no tragedy or event he wont use!
And then I asked you to point out where in the article it said such "facts". You couldn't! End of story!!!!!
Thread: Yet another CHILD dies because of Social workers
Now can we leave it at that until we know the facts?
whitepaws: God No, I wouldnt want to comment on something that hasnt been fully investigated and the picture still isnt clear on ....God love the poor wee fella and my heart goes out to the family and friends of that tradgedy.
Now can we leave it at that until we know the facts?
whitepaws: now as i have said for myself not face ,that My Assumption is as i quoted ......
I will go a step further ...I assume that the Father who rightly is well distressed loved his son From this I will assume he would, like any Parent (this is Mothers and Fathers) would prefer that the Child/ren live with them if they split up .
Now Unfortunately Social workers or child protection workers or case workers when they try to de-humanise their work ALWAYS give the child/ren to the mother ...This i know as FACT .
Now they try to put a home help of family support people into help Yes the Mothers as they have removed the children from the Fathers and sometimes this works and sometimes it doesnt ..
Based on the paper article...based on the current system in place and based on the past judgements it is more than fair to ASSUME from my pont of view that faces mild comments can be justified ....
I will go a step further ...I assume that the Father who rightly is well distressed loved his son From this I will assume he would, like any Parent (this is Mothers and Fathers) would prefer that the Child/ren live with them if they split up .
Now Unfortunately Social workers or child protection workers or case workers when they try to de-humanise their work ALWAYS give the child/ren to the mother ...This i know as FACT .
Now they try to put a home help of family support people into help Yes the Mothers as they have removed the children from the Fathers and sometimes this works and sometimes it doesnt ..
Based on the paper article...based on the current system in place and based on the past judgements it is more than fair to ASSUME from my pont of view that faces mild comments can be justified ....
I am sorry but this is not a fact....i know personally of two fathers who have their kids living with them...one through the normal family court system....the other through the social services.
I could also tell you of a situation very close to me whereby the child does not live with its mother and this was decided along with social workers. SO whereby your statement might sit for a lot of cases.....it by no means stands for ALL cases.....cos that FACT is just plain inaccurate.
More Threads
How far is too far?
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Icebergs Still Around
What's going on
Salami, Salami, Baloney
What I Lack In Vocabulary
everything is changing
Nature
1830's Music
rarotonga
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).