Extinct species (121)
SliprywnwtMissouri, USA37 Threads 15 Polls 211 PostsWhat extinct species would you bring back if you could? Why?
------ This thread is Archived ------
virgins 
------ This thread is Archived ------
a dino so i could shoot it
------ This thread is Archived ------
stringman: virgins
That's a good one!
------ This thread is Archived ------
cchances: a dino so i could shoot it
A Brontasauris would be cool just for the sheer size of it.Dont think dirty.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Chilverous Gentlemen 
------ This thread is Archived ------
venusenvy: Chilverous Gentlemen
There's still some around.
It's just me opinion that women's lib has something to with why men aren't as chilverous as they once were.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ccincy: There's still some around.It's just me opinion that women's lib has something to with why men aren't as chilverous as they once were.
I think it has something to do with divorce court. What a joke
Canada------ This thread is Archived ------
chatonlyman2: I think it has something to do with divorce court. What a jokeCanada
And the Sons that grow up after the divorce court. If the kid thinks Mom gave Dad a raw deal he'll resent her for life. It's one consequence not even a Feminist can shirk from.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Obstinance_Works: And the Sons that grow up after the divorce court. If the kid thinks Mom gave Dad a raw deal he'll resent her for life. It's one consequence not even a Feminist can shirk from.
Im still waiting for that to hit home.
------ This thread is Archived ------
thylscinus
'tasmanian zebra wolf'
'tasmanian zebra wolf'
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ccincy: There's still some around.It's just me opinion that women's lib has something to with why men aren't as chilverous as they once were.
Of course, Cc. Chivalry and feminism are in fact mutually exclusive. Chivalry involves a tacit quid pro quo; men are chivalrous to women they deem are worthy of the chivalrous sacrifice. Throughout Western history (Westerm only, as chivalry was a knighthood concept invented by Europeans during the Middle Ages), men have considered worthy women to bo those who are relatively chaste, pure of reputation, monogamously loyal and delicate of manners. Does that describe the typical modern Western feminist? Of course not. To ask the question is to laugh at the absurdity of asking it.
------ This thread is Archived ------
jono7: thylscinus
'tasmanian zebra wolf'
No King T-Rex for me. But would like to see a wolly mammoth and aparently this is possible to recreate.'tasmanian zebra wolf'
------ This thread is Archived ------
Obstinance_Works: Of course, Cc. Chivalry and feminism are in fact mutually exclusive. Chivalry involves a tacit quid pro quo; men are chivalrous to women they deem are worthy of the chivalrous sacrifice. Throughout Western history (Westerm only, as chivalry was a knighthood concept invented by Europeans during the Middle Ages), men have considered worthy women to bo those who are relatively chaste, pure of reputation, monogamously loyal and delicate of manners. Does that describe the typical modern Western feminist? Of course not. To ask the question is to laugh at the absurdity of asking it.
Why do you never give a source for your quotes? Makes it look like you are pretending to have written the stuff yourself.
------ This thread is Archived ------
The Dodo because it seemed such an inoffensive creature.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Glatlol: Why do you never give a source for your quotes? Makes it look like you are pretending to have written the stuff yourself.
Maybe he does, have you any proof otherwise????
------ This thread is Archived ------
tomcatwarne: Maybe he does, have you any proof otherwise????
Well here's a little more of the article...
When a man holds open a door for a woman, or carries her heavy bags, he is doing so under the guise of an implicit pact between himself and all of womenkind. He assumes her relative weakness, modesty and submissiveness, and she assumes his strength and leadership. There is an unspoken agreement that both sides will hold up their end of the bargain. Implicit, too, in chivalry is a subconscious awareness that women are reproductively more valuable than men. Without a man’s confidence in these assumptions, the rationale for chivalry, and the desire to grant it, dissipate like the memories of so many one night stands.
Feminism is, at its core, an ideology of will to power scaffolded by lies. It has little to do with equality. It’s goal is the power aggrandizement of women at the expense of men (as it has to be since power is zero sum), and by whatever means necessary. That’s it. As long as feminism remains a force in modern society, and sabotages the minds of significant numbers of yummies (Young urban minxes), chivalry is DOA. The two ideologies not only have nothing in common, they are conspicuously antagonistic.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Obstinance_Works: Of course, Cc. Chivalry and feminism are in fact mutually exclusive. Chivalry involves a tacit quid pro quo; men are chivalrous to women they deem are worthy of the chivalrous sacrifice. Throughout Western history (Westerm only, as chivalry was a knighthood concept invented by Europeans during the Middle Ages), men have considered worthy women to bo those who are relatively chaste, pure of reputation, monogamously loyal and delicate of manners. Does that describe the typical modern Western feminist? Of course not. To ask the question is to laugh at the absurdity of asking it.
Yes Ob and you got it from this:
Five Roissy Quotes: Feminison Edition.
------ This thread is Archived ------
bodleing: Well here's a little more of the article...
When a man holds open a door for a woman, or carries her heavy bags, he is doing so under the guise of an implicit pact between himself and all of womenkind. He assumes her relative weakness, modesty and submissiveness, and she assumes his strength and leadership. There is an unspoken agreement that both sides will hold up their end of the bargain. Implicit, too, in chivalry is a subconscious awareness that women are reproductively more valuable than men. Without a man’s confidence in these assumptions, the rationale for chivalry, and the desire to grant it, dissipate like the memories of so many one night stands.
Feminism is, at its core, an ideology of will to power scaffolded by lies. It has little to do with equality. It’s goal is the power aggrandizement of women at the expense of men (as it has to be since power is zero sum), and by whatever means necessary. That’s it. As long as feminism remains a force in modern society, and sabotages the minds of significant numbers of yummies (Young urban minxes), chivalry is DOA. The two ideologies not only have nothing in common, they are conspicuously antagonistic.
When a man holds open a door for a woman, or carries her heavy bags, he is doing so under the guise of an implicit pact between himself and all of womenkind. He assumes her relative weakness, modesty and submissiveness, and she assumes his strength and leadership. There is an unspoken agreement that both sides will hold up their end of the bargain. Implicit, too, in chivalry is a subconscious awareness that women are reproductively more valuable than men. Without a man’s confidence in these assumptions, the rationale for chivalry, and the desire to grant it, dissipate like the memories of so many one night stands.
Feminism is, at its core, an ideology of will to power scaffolded by lies. It has little to do with equality. It’s goal is the power aggrandizement of women at the expense of men (as it has to be since power is zero sum), and by whatever means necessary. That’s it. As long as feminism remains a force in modern society, and sabotages the minds of significant numbers of yummies (Young urban minxes), chivalry is DOA. The two ideologies not only have nothing in common, they are conspicuously antagonistic.
Yes Bod and I had earlier posted another link I found that contained the same info.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Glatlol: Why do you never give a source for your quotes? Makes it look like you are pretending to have written the stuff yourself.
Ha haa. I'd rather you didn't draw attention to the fact. But this is laziness, not plagiarism.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
Feel Good Music
wanting beyond need
the way you look
Common Issues with the BMW X1
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
The Best of the GOP
Unions support Democrats!
your personality
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
4,605 Views
120 Comments
in Chat Threads
Created: Mar 2013
Last Viewed: 15 hrs ago
Last Commented: Apr 2013
0 Likes