chris27292729: You do have a fast riding imagination, Never wished harm to Americans. Having such wild imagination,i think you have to start writing scenarios for movies.-And better based in those facts. 1.- 1912 The British force Iran to form an Anglo-Iran Petrol Company. 2.- 1941 The British force the King of Iran to abdicate in favor of his son Mohamet Reza Pahlevi (A Yes man for the British). 3.- 1951 the Iranian parliament appoints Mohamet Mosantek as Prime Minister.Within a month Mosantek makes the Anglo-Iranian company nationalised.Then the British impose embargo on Iranians and the sale of Iranian oil.President Truman stops the British plans for a military attack on the Iranians. Time magazine declares Mosantek "person of the Year". Under President Aik,and the Dulles brothers,plot a cup against Mosantek,who get deposited and murdered.When the Shah tries to modernise the country,the religious leaders object,and turn the Iranians against the Shah,who escaped from Iran in 1978. When the Carter administration gave shelter to the Shah,the ungry Iranian croud,against the USA,occupied the US Embacy for 444 days.All he papers from the American Embassy in Teheran,prove the US involvement in the internal affairs of IRAN. Of course now,as USA with their own production of oil,don't need Iranian oil anymore,nor to plan uprising,or interfering in the Internal affairs of other countries.US urged Saddam Hussein to attack Iran. and when the tables turned,abandon him first,bombarded him after and finaly invaded Irag.
Your timeline and info here is a bitter short of truth and facts, eh. You've probably over-studied the German Supreme Command tactics of 1917, when/where they approved, transported and financed Lenin and his Bolsheviks to complete the revolt and take over Russia.
raphael119: "So let me ask you, 10 years down the road. Which one will give us more oil, backing Iran or backing Israel?"
Neither.
Raphael I have to admit that neither would be of any use for us in anyway but what I can see is for a very strategic set up to let these bozos take care of their own problems. If and when we would have depended on any of them for such a cause maybe it will raise the bar to be involved at a closer proximity.
But don't forget the holders of the world's economy are no less than those of the Rosenthals, etc, and let us not forget where they are from..
raphael119washington d.c., District of Columbia USA5,181 posts
lindsyjones: Raphael I have to admit that neither would be of any use for us in anyway but what I can see is for a very strategic set up to let these bozos take care of their own problems. If and when we would have depended on any of them for such a cause maybe it will raise the bar to be involved at a closer proximity.
But don't forget the holders of the world's economy are no less than those of the Rosenthals, etc, and let us not forget where they are from..
Ive become cynical about foreign relations. We have them solely to protect ourselves and benefit from them.
chris27292729: Saddam pleaded with the Americans, ""But you urged me to attack Iran and i complied"" Then started Talking to himself. """Whats wrong with those Americans,in the morning is your friend, and in the evening you enemy"""
raphael119washington d.c., District of Columbia USA5,181 posts
Ken_19: How do you get that conclusion? He had no WMDs had given that up long ago. Had nothing at all to do with 9/11 so we invaded, let his better lawyers be killed, then video taped his head being pulled off his body with a hanging rope magnitudes too long.
I was referring to the Iran Iraq war. If we had fully backed Iraq, Iran wouldnt exist. He antagonized the Baby Bush administration later and gave them a lame excuse to fabricate reasons to invade.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).