Face nappies, muzzles, submission and an end to job security (460)
I have a selection of songs...for the masked sheeple
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
Has anyone noticed
no one talks about seks anymore...
ON A DATING SITE_-????
okay, i`ll start
seks,seks,seks?
seks seks seks seks!
no one talks about seks anymore...
ON A DATING SITE_-????
okay, i`ll start
seks,seks,seks?
seks seks seks seks!------ This thread is Archived ------
Depopulationist Vaccine Pusher Bill Gates Says Life Will Only Return to “Normal” at the End of 2021 When There’s a Chi-Com Virus Vaccine.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Medical Experts, Scientists Denounce Pandemic Lockdowns, Urge ‘Focused Protection’.
Dozens of medical experts, epidemiologists, and biologists gathered last weekend to urge the adoption of a strategy they call “focused protection” to replace current coronavirus pandemic policies that, they say, have produced nothing less than “devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”
The internationally known experts, who identify themselves as “coming from both the left and right, and around the world,” have produced what they call the “Great Barrington Declaration,” which, to date, has been signed by nearly 4,700 medical and public health scientists, 8,900 medical practitioners, and 123,300 members of the general public.
"As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have concerns about the damaging health impacts of the prevailing #COVID19 policies, and recommend an approach we call #FocusedProtection." @MartinKulldorff @SunetraGupta #GBDeclaration
— American Institute for Economic Research (@aier) October 5, 2020
The chief authors of the declaration are Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, who is a biostatistician and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations; Dr. Sunetra Gupta, epidemiologist and professor at Oxford University with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases; and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, who is a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert.
The other cosigners of the declaration are identified on the document.
The experts met at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, to discuss what AIER described as “the global emergency created by the unprecedented use of state compulsion in the management of the Covid-19 pandemic.”
“We have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection,” the public health experts assert, adding some specific concerns:
The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
The experts say waiting to resume normal life until a vaccine is approved and readily available will cause “irreparable damage,” and they provide the public with a list of what they already know about the infection caused by the coronavirus:
We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
Dozens of medical experts, epidemiologists, and biologists gathered last weekend to urge the adoption of a strategy they call “focused protection” to replace current coronavirus pandemic policies that, they say, have produced nothing less than “devastating effects on short and long-term public health.”
The internationally known experts, who identify themselves as “coming from both the left and right, and around the world,” have produced what they call the “Great Barrington Declaration,” which, to date, has been signed by nearly 4,700 medical and public health scientists, 8,900 medical practitioners, and 123,300 members of the general public.
"As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have concerns about the damaging health impacts of the prevailing #COVID19 policies, and recommend an approach we call #FocusedProtection." @MartinKulldorff @SunetraGupta #GBDeclaration
— American Institute for Economic Research (@aier) October 5, 2020
The chief authors of the declaration are Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, who is a biostatistician and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations; Dr. Sunetra Gupta, epidemiologist and professor at Oxford University with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases; and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, who is a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert.
The other cosigners of the declaration are identified on the document.
The experts met at the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, to discuss what AIER described as “the global emergency created by the unprecedented use of state compulsion in the management of the Covid-19 pandemic.”
“We have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection,” the public health experts assert, adding some specific concerns:
The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
The experts say waiting to resume normal life until a vaccine is approved and readily available will cause “irreparable damage,” and they provide the public with a list of what they already know about the infection caused by the coronavirus:
We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Continued.
The scientists and medical professionals say the most “compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity” is to encourage all those with minimal risk of death to “live their lives normally” as they develop immunity, and focus protection strategies on those at highest risk.
“Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19,” the experts assert, adding, for example, that nursing homes should require staff that have developed immunity and frequent PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing of any other staff and all visitors.
Older individuals living at home should also, when possible, meet visitors outdoors, the medical experts recommend, and minimize leaving their home by having items such as groceries delivered to their houses.
“Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal,” the authors of the declaration write. “Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold.”
For young people, in-person teaching at schools should be the norm, the scientists continue, with a return to extracurricular activities, such as sports.
The authors recommend a return to open businesses, restaurants, and cultural events.
“People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity,” the medical experts recommend.
The declaration’s authors invite individuals to sign the document here.
James Freeman, assistant editor at the Wall Street Journal, remarked Tuesday the Great Barrington Declaration has been “almost entirely ignored by the media outlets that spend much of their days presenting themselves as obedient to science.”
He wrote:
Imagine if places like New York and New Jersey had followed this plan, instead of squandering vast resources locking down low-risk populations while failing to prioritize the protection of the elderly. Somehow Gov. Phil Murphy (D., N.J.) has largely avoided media censure even though, adjusting for population, the residents of his state have suffered more Covid deaths than anywhere else in the country.
Kulldorff told Fox News host Laura Ingraham the resistance to resuming normal life for those at low risk is “stunning,” since “that is what you would do if you follow basic public health practice.”
He explained there is “a perception that lockdowns and contact tracing is something that the scientific community is behind, and there are some who are advocating that.”
Kulldorff said he and his colleagues favor “risk-based” or “age-based” strategies in which the elderly and other high-risk groups are protected, while younger individuals and those with low risk resume life as normal.
Bhattacharya reacted to criticism of the Great Barrington Declaration and the concept of herd immunity by saying, “Denying herd immunity is like denying gravity.”
“Even if you have a vaccine, it’s still herd immunity that protects people against the virus or the pathogens,” he told Ingraham, adding the “focused protection” model presented in the declaration “will get us there more quickly, with less loss of life, and less damage to other aspects of public health that, I think, get ignored by these doctors that are essentially denying basic facts about biology.”
Gupta told Ingraham disadvantaged children are especially suffering in areas that have not reopened in-person learning, since their families often cannot afford tutors or provide consistent supervision of remote learning.
“It’s absolutely tragic, it’s unconscionable,” that young people are prevented from making progress, she said.
pic.twitter.com/OxmRcZ5nUZ
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 5, 2020
The scientists and medical professionals say the most “compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity” is to encourage all those with minimal risk of death to “live their lives normally” as they develop immunity, and focus protection strategies on those at highest risk.
“Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19,” the experts assert, adding, for example, that nursing homes should require staff that have developed immunity and frequent PCR (polymerase chain reaction) testing of any other staff and all visitors.
Older individuals living at home should also, when possible, meet visitors outdoors, the medical experts recommend, and minimize leaving their home by having items such as groceries delivered to their houses.
“Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal,” the authors of the declaration write. “Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold.”
For young people, in-person teaching at schools should be the norm, the scientists continue, with a return to extracurricular activities, such as sports.
The authors recommend a return to open businesses, restaurants, and cultural events.
“People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity,” the medical experts recommend.
The declaration’s authors invite individuals to sign the document here.
James Freeman, assistant editor at the Wall Street Journal, remarked Tuesday the Great Barrington Declaration has been “almost entirely ignored by the media outlets that spend much of their days presenting themselves as obedient to science.”
He wrote:
Imagine if places like New York and New Jersey had followed this plan, instead of squandering vast resources locking down low-risk populations while failing to prioritize the protection of the elderly. Somehow Gov. Phil Murphy (D., N.J.) has largely avoided media censure even though, adjusting for population, the residents of his state have suffered more Covid deaths than anywhere else in the country.
Kulldorff told Fox News host Laura Ingraham the resistance to resuming normal life for those at low risk is “stunning,” since “that is what you would do if you follow basic public health practice.”
He explained there is “a perception that lockdowns and contact tracing is something that the scientific community is behind, and there are some who are advocating that.”
Kulldorff said he and his colleagues favor “risk-based” or “age-based” strategies in which the elderly and other high-risk groups are protected, while younger individuals and those with low risk resume life as normal.
Bhattacharya reacted to criticism of the Great Barrington Declaration and the concept of herd immunity by saying, “Denying herd immunity is like denying gravity.”
“Even if you have a vaccine, it’s still herd immunity that protects people against the virus or the pathogens,” he told Ingraham, adding the “focused protection” model presented in the declaration “will get us there more quickly, with less loss of life, and less damage to other aspects of public health that, I think, get ignored by these doctors that are essentially denying basic facts about biology.”
Gupta told Ingraham disadvantaged children are especially suffering in areas that have not reopened in-person learning, since their families often cannot afford tutors or provide consistent supervision of remote learning.
“It’s absolutely tragic, it’s unconscionable,” that young people are prevented from making progress, she said.
pic.twitter.com/OxmRcZ5nUZ
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 5, 2020
------ This thread is Archived ------
Continued.
Bhattacharya also reacted to President Donald Trump’s video message as he ended his hospitalization for treatment of the coronavirus infection.
“And one thing that’s for certain, don’t let it dominate you,” Trump urged Americans. “Don’t be afraid of it. You’re going to beat it. We have the best medical equipment. We have the best medicines all developed recently. And you’re going to beat it.”
“That’s exactly what I learned about public health, what you’re supposed to do,” Bhattacharya said. “You’re not supposed to sow panic. You’re supposed to reassure, give accurate information about risks, trust people to make good judgments on their own behalf. The president did that, I think, tonight, don’t you think?”
He added that COVID “is not a death sentence.”
“And I think we’ve created this idea in the public mind that it is something so unique and so deadly that we should utterly end all normal existence as a result of it,” he said. “That’s not right.”
Bhattacharya also reacted to President Donald Trump’s video message as he ended his hospitalization for treatment of the coronavirus infection.
“And one thing that’s for certain, don’t let it dominate you,” Trump urged Americans. “Don’t be afraid of it. You’re going to beat it. We have the best medical equipment. We have the best medicines all developed recently. And you’re going to beat it.”
“That’s exactly what I learned about public health, what you’re supposed to do,” Bhattacharya said. “You’re not supposed to sow panic. You’re supposed to reassure, give accurate information about risks, trust people to make good judgments on their own behalf. The president did that, I think, tonight, don’t you think?”
He added that COVID “is not a death sentence.”
“And I think we’ve created this idea in the public mind that it is something so unique and so deadly that we should utterly end all normal existence as a result of it,” he said. “That’s not right.”
------ This thread is Archived ------
Chinese Whistleblower Claims COVID-19 is ‘Unrestricted Bioweapon’, Releases Paper Detailing ‘Large-Scale Organized Scientific Fraud’
This is a scandal of biblical proportions.
Chinese whistleblower Li-Meng Yan, formerly a virologist with the World Health Organization (WHO) reference lab who was forced to vacate her position at the University of Hong Kong under duress, is putting herself and her family in great peril to share the truth about COVID-19’s origins.
She has co-authored an academic paper detailing how there has been “large-scale organized scientific fraud” amidst the cover-up of COVID-19 being a bioweapon created by the Chinese government.
“We used biological evidence and in-depth analyses to show that SARS-CoV-2 must be a laboratory product, which was created by using a template virus (ZC45/ZXC21) owned by military research laboratories under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government,” reads the paper.
Latest: Justice Department Announces Lawsuit Against Yale University for Affirmative Action Racial Discrimination
The paper explains how the virus can be produced by scientists “in approximately six months using a template virus owned by a laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).” The paper claims that the global cover-up to hide the origins of the coronavirus has resulted in “damages…made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global community.”
This is a scandal of biblical proportions.
Chinese whistleblower Li-Meng Yan, formerly a virologist with the World Health Organization (WHO) reference lab who was forced to vacate her position at the University of Hong Kong under duress, is putting herself and her family in great peril to share the truth about COVID-19’s origins.
She has co-authored an academic paper detailing how there has been “large-scale organized scientific fraud” amidst the cover-up of COVID-19 being a bioweapon created by the Chinese government.
“We used biological evidence and in-depth analyses to show that SARS-CoV-2 must be a laboratory product, which was created by using a template virus (ZC45/ZXC21) owned by military research laboratories under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government,” reads the paper.
Latest: Justice Department Announces Lawsuit Against Yale University for Affirmative Action Racial Discrimination
The paper explains how the virus can be produced by scientists “in approximately six months using a template virus owned by a laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).” The paper claims that the global cover-up to hide the origins of the coronavirus has resulted in “damages…made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global community.”
------ This thread is Archived ------
Continued.
Additionally, the paper details how the RaTG13 virus was manmade by Chinese scientists as well. It notes how the Chinese destroyed the evidence of RaTG13 in order to hide their highly unethical viral research from the unsuspecting public.
The paper notes that the virus is a terrifying bioweapon despite its relatively low rates of lethality in those affected. The difficulty to trace and contain the virus makes it the perfect bioweapon to cripple and ruin societies.
“In addition, the transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 also resulted in panic in the global community, disruption of social orders, and decimation of the world’s economy. The range and destructive power of SARS-CoV-2 are both unprecedented,” the paper states.
“Clearly,SARS-CoV-2 not only meets but also surpasses the standards of a traditional bioweapon. Therefore, it should be defined as an Unrestricted Bioweapon,” the paper continues.
Big League Politics reported in August when Li-Meng went public with her findings that COVID-19 originated as a Chinese bioweapon:
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a former virology specialist for the Hong Kong’s School of Public Health forced to flee to the US to protect her safety, has claimed that COVID-19 was “created in a military lab” as a possible bioweapon.
Li-Meng told the Taiwan News Agency Lude Press that she “had clearly assessed that the virus came from a Chinese Communist Party military lab” and the “Wuhan wet market was just used as a decoy.”
She claims she went to her superiors to report this knowledge, she was laughed off and ignored. She believed that if she went to the high levels of the Communist Party, her life could be in danger. Many scientists who were the early whistleblowers about the COVID-19 pandemic were silenced or mysteriously disappeared by the ruthless Chinese government.
“I knew that once I spoke up, I could disappear at any time, just like all the brave protesters in Hong Kong,” she said. “I could disappear at any time. Even my name would no longer exist.”
Even though she understood “what kinds of things the Chinese government would do” by growing up under communist tyranny, Li-Meng still never would have guessed “how low [the CCP] would stoop.” She hopes that her claims about COVID-19’s origin will accelerate “the outside world’s understanding of the regime and helping the Chinese people to overthrow it.”
“The China government refused to let overseas experts, including ones in Hong Kong, do research in China. So I turned to my friends to get more information,” Li-Meng said.
Li-Meng said that the Hong Kong School of Public Health initially told her to continue her investigation but later told her to “keep silent and be careful.” They released a statement confirming that Li-Meng is no longer employed at the university but would not give any further details.
COVID-19 could be the cruelest hoax in world history. The number of influential, powerful interests conspiring to keep the truth from being widely understood by the public is simply staggering.
Additionally, the paper details how the RaTG13 virus was manmade by Chinese scientists as well. It notes how the Chinese destroyed the evidence of RaTG13 in order to hide their highly unethical viral research from the unsuspecting public.
The paper notes that the virus is a terrifying bioweapon despite its relatively low rates of lethality in those affected. The difficulty to trace and contain the virus makes it the perfect bioweapon to cripple and ruin societies.
“In addition, the transmissibility, morbidity, and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 also resulted in panic in the global community, disruption of social orders, and decimation of the world’s economy. The range and destructive power of SARS-CoV-2 are both unprecedented,” the paper states.
“Clearly,SARS-CoV-2 not only meets but also surpasses the standards of a traditional bioweapon. Therefore, it should be defined as an Unrestricted Bioweapon,” the paper continues.
Big League Politics reported in August when Li-Meng went public with her findings that COVID-19 originated as a Chinese bioweapon:
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a former virology specialist for the Hong Kong’s School of Public Health forced to flee to the US to protect her safety, has claimed that COVID-19 was “created in a military lab” as a possible bioweapon.
Li-Meng told the Taiwan News Agency Lude Press that she “had clearly assessed that the virus came from a Chinese Communist Party military lab” and the “Wuhan wet market was just used as a decoy.”
She claims she went to her superiors to report this knowledge, she was laughed off and ignored. She believed that if she went to the high levels of the Communist Party, her life could be in danger. Many scientists who were the early whistleblowers about the COVID-19 pandemic were silenced or mysteriously disappeared by the ruthless Chinese government.
“I knew that once I spoke up, I could disappear at any time, just like all the brave protesters in Hong Kong,” she said. “I could disappear at any time. Even my name would no longer exist.”
Even though she understood “what kinds of things the Chinese government would do” by growing up under communist tyranny, Li-Meng still never would have guessed “how low [the CCP] would stoop.” She hopes that her claims about COVID-19’s origin will accelerate “the outside world’s understanding of the regime and helping the Chinese people to overthrow it.”
“The China government refused to let overseas experts, including ones in Hong Kong, do research in China. So I turned to my friends to get more information,” Li-Meng said.
Li-Meng said that the Hong Kong School of Public Health initially told her to continue her investigation but later told her to “keep silent and be careful.” They released a statement confirming that Li-Meng is no longer employed at the university but would not give any further details.
COVID-19 could be the cruelest hoax in world history. The number of influential, powerful interests conspiring to keep the truth from being widely understood by the public is simply staggering.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Above is from:
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dedovix: Has anyone noticed
no one talks about seks anymore...
ON A DATING SITE_-????
okay, i`ll start
seks,seks,seks? seks seks seks seks!
That's because it is prohibited during the pandemic. We need to keep our distances, remember?no one talks about seks anymore...
ON A DATING SITE_-????
okay, i`ll start
seks,seks,seks? seks seks seks seks!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Wake up it's a global scam and global reset...oppose this and save humanity
------ This thread is Archived ------
*EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN THE UK SHOULD READ THIS!*
**PARTICULARLY THE PEOPLE THAT BELIEVE THE 'OFFICIAL NARRATIVE'!**
**MATT HANCOCK FOUND GUILTY FOR 'CRIMES AGAINST THE PEOPLE' FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT IN A DANGEROUS VACCINE! **
**PARTICULARLY THE PEOPLE THAT BELIEVE THE 'OFFICIAL NARRATIVE'!**
**MATT HANCOCK FOUND GUILTY FOR 'CRIMES AGAINST THE PEOPLE' FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT IN A DANGEROUS VACCINE! **
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ded the can't read. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
Discuss after reading the whole article.
Daily Mail. Saturday, Oct 10th 2020 1AM
Russia's Covid vaccine might actually WORK: Moscow scientists claim 'Sputnik V' jab that stunned scientists when Putin gave it world-first approval proved safe and effective in study published in UK journal The Lancet.
Daily Mail. Saturday, Oct 10th 2020 1AM
Russia's Covid vaccine might actually WORK: Moscow scientists claim 'Sputnik V' jab that stunned scientists when Putin gave it world-first approval proved safe and effective in study published in UK journal The Lancet.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
other can see but not you
Common Issues with the BMW X1
The Best of the GOP
rarotonga
Feel Good Music
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
your personality
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Sleepy Don!
How far is too far?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
This law was made in the middle of the 90's, it was made to give bosses more chances to fire someone and also they hoped the workers would be motivated to study more and change jobs, getting better jobs. But when you get a hard job, working all day who is motivated to study? And when they pay you minimum wage, who can afford to study?
So bosses immediately started misusing this law, and now 20 years later the governments still haven't done enought to protect the workers.
It's a shame.