Good guys ( Archived) (101)

P.S. . . . I don't belive in eqaulity.

Read some Nietszche

well said,,,,,

lol

sounds like a robbie williams song i know .........called supreme

Oh it seemed forever stopped today
All the lonely hearts in London
Caught a plane and flew away
And all the best women are married
All the handsome men are gay
You feel deprived

The good guys are always taken because once you find one you don't let them go. maybe they are all tied up and someone is keeping them all for themselves.

No kitty honey - I explained where they are. the good guys - like the good ladies - are undiscovered, not "taken".

Wilki, I think you've got a chip on your shoulder, my man.

Naturally every long-term 'single' man thinks he's a good man and then wonders why he is not 'taken' - maybe he needs to start wondering if his idea of a 'good man' is the same as a woman's idea of one.

On the inverse, you sit at a Starbucks and see all the girls your instinct says are good with all the guys a single girl's instinct says are good.

So the naff guys and the naff girls left over get together and naff out - and they're the good ones with all the good qualities, are they? Hmmm . . .

Natural selection - people forget about nature and that humans are animals!

What is 'good' is strong, healthy, rich, genetically prime, virile - practically giving off pheromones.

What is 'bad' instinctively has always been what is weak, unhealthy, carrying bad genetics, sickly . . . singled out for extinction and thus 9 times out 10 ten SINGLE.

Also, my friend, on 'the good guy rap' - happiness equals instinct.

Strong, healthy, intelligent, genetically prime, stand out, unique - constitutes 'good' to the instinct.

Nice, kind, caring, soft and gentle: are feminine qualities men project at woman expecting them to be attracted to - what? Their own good inner qualities?

Woman wants MAN. Man wants WOMAN.

All that other rubbish is moral rubbish contrary to true human nature and nature itself and is designed by the weak to save the weak by making the stronger less appealing to the genetically prime partner.

And to presuppose that someone possessing these qualities - the alpha male - cannot be a good partner and everything a woman dreams of - a good man -

is perhaps YOUR dream. All due respect.

The strong, wealthy, intelligent and rich, rule. And have always been the most attractive. Have always constituted 'good' to the instinct.

How many woman walk down the street with a beggar if they are not beggars themselves? Life is instinct; those who go against instinct for the ‘moral good rap’ go to it to their own folly and against their own instincts. Let them not complain! Indeed it will be called ‘good’ – by the beggars!

But the strong and rich will frown at the beautiful woman with beggar! Just as the beggar frowns in contempt at the rich man with the beautiful woman. At the unfairness of life!

All the rest is fact AFTER the fact. Fact, then, AFTER instinct! Qaulities, then, that are revealed later and are not initial attractions to a woman.

You attempt, then, to attract women on the grounds of secondary attractions because – what – they are greater than what initially attracts a woman? You attract her initially and then you affirm the attraction – you validate it – with the secondary attractions.

What many single men seem to lament is the fact that hot woman are not with average guys. And would then come up with a phoney rap that says if a woman really wants a good man she should seek the average man!

Hah! How noble . . . how noble of the average man! He must truly be ‘the good man’ that woman is looking for!

There is no good man; good is subjective – it’s a matter of subjective (personal) opinion.

But instinct, instinct is the objective (impersonal) truth.

And instinct is the first rule of attraction!