In conclusion I refute the fact that the alpha male and alpha female are anything other than the ultimate man and the ultimate woman; but that ‘true happiness’ (a fundamental misconception, for no such thing exists!) is subjective: you as an individual (individually constituted) will seek accordingly due to your strengths and weaknesses. But the one fits all herd-morality is rubbish! Don’t try to condition the world to your weaknesses nor expect it to conform to them. We, the strong of mind and opinion and the life-affirming beings, will not follow and will not allow the weak to condition a strong world to allow for favouritism to weakness. Do not affect to be so delicate in this hard, tough, competitive world! Go out and get the best food or get in the back of the line at the soup kitchen. Nature does not allow it, and to mankind it is a compromise he has made based on his compassion and sympathy. All credit to him. I only have empathy for my fellow man. Equality is communistic: everything equal in a world of strong and weak, wise and foolish, tall and short, beautiful and ugly. A wishful ideal! Even the great Socrates once wined that the power should be given to the wise by the strong, and then the world would be saved. What an idealist! Power must be taken; fought for, attained at the highest stake; it will never be handed over by the strong to the weak so they can have a go with something they didn’t attain.
Please know that I respect all opinions on this board and all refutations of my opinions, and find individuality of view intriguing and dogmatic thinking tiresome and stagnating. The meek will inherit the earth, etc, and any refutation of the laws of nature laughable.
Also, Wilikis, I find your posts the most intellectually engaging on here – all credit to you – please do not feel utterly offended that I refute them. I am an individual against herd-thinking and herd-morality and I don’t believe what applies to one applies to all OR SHOULD. What applies to the weak applied to the strong; what applies to the intelligent applied to the fool – et al. The strong man rejoices in his strength. The intellectual in their intellect. The beautiful in their beauty. I, for one, would not begrudge them this! But that fools should rejoice in foolishness? And weak in weakness? And sick in sickness? And the unhealthy in poor health? In what is instinctively not to be praised? The weak in their weakness? - I suppose they should, because it means they will inherit the earth – after all, this is only fair. That the strong have the initiative to strive and struggle by the sweat of their brow to win or lose what is good in life but the weak sit back and then inherit it all. Credit to the opinion – that is your ‘individual’ view! But it is my opinion that it is dogmatic and rests on untruth and wishfully-pragmatic idealism. I respect all opinions and do not disrespect them just because I disagree with them.
Good guys are unwanted by ladies, unless ladies over 35 after these have finished their adventures and get to remember something called family, so why should a guy be good anymore, I was so good and I get betrayed more than once, so let's so bad
that is the most accurate answer I have seen to this forum. The good guys are out there just expand your search and you will find you will have better luck.
Again, it depends on your defintion of a 'good guy'
Why do men presuppose what woman are looking for in them?
One sometimes wonders if they falsely manifest what they think woman are looking for to then make it an attraction and end up repelling them instead . . .
And i suppose a woman who looks for a hot, healthy, intelligent, strong confident rich guy is a 'bad woman'.
hahahahah.
Woman know what is real AND what they are looking for.
Yeah, sure, a moment after I got a post from you saying 'who the f----- are you calling average' (rather immature) i get a 1-star rating from a man (and it still remains the only one).
hahaha
Enjoy the 10 I gave you.
In conclusion: women prefer virile, confident, competitive, strong, intelligent, healthy, wealthy men by instinct and not the glasses-wearing church-goer who claims to be, what - Gods REAL gift to woman?
That ill-virtue is a compromise based on one's own lack of appeal.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).