Lately i am feeling very strongly that He can't be a pervert, its in the system once a thief always a thief. . . Thou he has a long history of charges, his work and songs are anything but creepy,s*xual or evil. . . And after the Houston fiasco. . . and Jackson kids having a hard time now that they are thrust into the very people he tried to protect, . . they even manage to take the guardian away from his kids, being his mother their grandmother. . . and their actions and words. . .i believe he was framed!
montemonte: It does matter. His legacy depended on it.
quick google search.. The King of Pop pulled in $160 million over the past year, more than any musician dead or alive (or any other celebrity, for that matter). He banks the bulk of his bucks from two Cirque du Soleil shows—Immortal and One—and from his Mijac Music catalogue, his recorded music sales and his half of the Sony SNE -0.93%/ATV publishing empire , which includes copyrights to hits by the Beatles, Lady Gaga, Eminem and Taylor Swift, among others.
Jackson’s earnings are nearly three times as high as his nearest spectral competition, Elvis Presley, who totaled $55 million.
(ps monte...like yur new photo.... is it just me...or are we all startin' to look the same? .. )
jono7: quick google search.. The King of Pop pulled in $160 million over the past year, more than any musician dead or alive (or any other celebrity, for that matter). He banks the bulk of his bucks from two Cirque du Soleil shows—Immortal and One—and from his Mijac Music catalogue, his recorded music sales and his half of the Sony SNE -0.93%/ATV publishing empire , which includes copyrights to hits by the Beatles, Lady Gaga, Eminem and Taylor Swift, among others.
Jackson’s earnings are nearly three times as high as his nearest spectral competition, Elvis Presley, who totaled $55 million.(ps monte...like yur new photo.... is it just me...or are we all startin' to look the same? .. )
Jono.....I think everybody should have a paleface photo and if they want someone so see what they look like, send it in private mail. Then they won't be picking on little folk like me.
It's my understanding that he was just about broke when he died
jono7: quick google search.. The King of Pop pulled in $160 million over the past year, more than any musician dead or alive (or any other celebrity, for that matter). He banks the bulk of his bucks from two Cirque du Soleil shows—Immortal and One—and from his Mijac Music catalogue, his recorded music sales and his half of the Sony SNE -0.93%/ATV publishing empire , which includes copyrights to hits by the Beatles, Lady Gaga, Eminem and Taylor Swift, among others.
Jackson’s earnings are nearly three times as high as his nearest spectral competition, Elvis Presley, who totaled $55 million.(ps monte...like yur new photo.... is it just me...or are we all startin' to look the same? .. )
montemonte: Jono.....I think everybody should have a paleface photo and if they want someone so see what they look like, send it in private mail. Then they won't be picking on little folk like me.
It's my understanding that he was just about broke when he died
i like seeing the photos...helps folks project...
aawwww monte...i don't why some pics are removed and some aren't.....sorry you're feelin' picked on. but we remember who you are what you look like....(grin)
as for MJ...i dunno.... i thought he had overspent and was needing more money hence the tour.. i was surprised with that article re finance now
What normal man has sleepover and pajama parties with little boys? None! Ask yourself this question if the man who lives down the street took a great interest in your boys and all the boys in the neighborhood,would you allow them to not only be there all the time but to have sleepovers at his house and in his bed? If you are any kind of decent human being with half a brain in your head then the answer would be no!
jono7: i like seeing the photos...helps folks project...
aawwww monte...i don't know why some pics are removed and some aren't.....sorry you're feelin' picked on. but we remember who you are what you look like....(grin)
as for MJ...i dunno.... i thought he had overspent and was needing more money hence the tour.. i was surprised with that article re finance now
morgen90210: extreme is his moJo, he can't be having sleep overs with young girls, thou after being framed about those things he decided to have his own kids. . .
the only ones who knows the truth are his kids. . but now it seems they are in peril, he only trusted his mother,
He is not a child abuser, he wanted to be surrounded by children coz they are the innocent ones with the pureest heart, not the adults.
even I have been mistaken for one coz i mixed and play with kids most of the time. . .
being famous does not give you freedom nor mind of peace.
he was guarded by people that were using him. . . only time will tell from his kids
Myself, being an outsider seeing him, his portrayed character, or what he allowed the public to see and know. I believe the brutal childhood that he spoke of: and that the past did impact his outcome in life. The last fifteen years or so, my firm opinion is that. He had, what I unprofessionally call: The Peter Pan Syndrome: A boy that didn't want to grow-up. Cosmetic surgeries in an attempt from aging. His estate: The Neverland Ranch amongst other clues that pointed to a need to remain a boy, or try to capture a youth, that was never his... Yes, he is innocent.
It really does actually and had he been YOUR son, I'm sure you would think very differently.
So much of our present culture is based upon the assumption that certain events were 'as told in the official story lines' and, as time goes by it becomes more and more plain that we've been told lies and strung along by official sources.
So far as a man's innocence is concerned ... it's really very important that innocence be protected and upheld.
Look at the court dates and media coverage of the events leading to the Jackson arrest, trial and look then at the timeline of US Govt events ... it's quite plain that Jackson was used as a distraction while the US Govt lessened the liberty and rights of it's citizens.
HexagonKeySet: It really does actually and had he been YOUR son, I'm sure you would think very differently.
So much of our present culture is based upon the assumption that certain events were 'as told in the official story lines' and, as time goes by it becomes more and more plain that we've been told lies and strung along by official sources.
So far as a man's innocence is concerned ... it's really very important that innocence be protected and upheld.
Look at the court dates and media coverage of the events leading to the Jackson arrest, trial and look then at the timeline of US Govt events ... it's quite plain that Jackson was used as a distraction while the US Govt lessened the liberty and rights of it's citizens.
HexagonKeySet: It really does actually and had he been YOUR son, I'm sure you would think very differently.
So much of our present culture is based upon the assumption that certain events were 'as told in the official story lines' and, as time goes by it becomes more and more plain that we've been told lies and strung along by official sources.
So far as a man's innocence is concerned ... it's really very important that innocence be protected and upheld.
Look at the court dates and media coverage of the events leading to the Jackson arrest, trial and look then at the timeline of US Govt events ... it's quite plain that Jackson was used as a distraction while the US Govt lessened the liberty and rights of it's citizens.
HelenaRaber: What normal man has sleepover and pajama parties with little boys? None! Ask yourself this question if the man who lives down the street took a great interest in your boys and all the boys in the neighborhood,would you allow them to not only be there all the time but to have sleepovers at his house and in his bed? If you are any kind of decent human being with half a brain in your head then the answer would be no!
almera03: and I suppose we should give Jimmy Savile a medal for all his charity work, cause you know he's dead so why care what he did when he was alive, right?
No we shouldnt but why didnt his victims come out early. as always they wait till death and slaughter him in the press. Did he commit the crime then he should have done the time.
2girlsnocupunknown, Greater London, England UK2,621 posts
lushguy4you: No we shouldnt but why didnt his victims come out early. as always they wait till death and slaughter him in the press. Did he commit the crime then he should have done the time.
Because in the eyes of the BBC, he was a God. Nobody would have believed he had done what was claimed.
thank you all for your input, the truth is not buried with him to his grave... his kids are the keys but then their never once claim their father is a monster, and if they are NOT his kids, more easier to do his hearts contend.... still from the comments and actions.of his kids point to him being a wonderful father and enemies around them
lushguy4you: No we shouldnt but why didnt his victims come out early. as always they wait till death and slaughter him in the press. Did he commit the crime then he should have done the time.
Victims did come forward while he was alive but when they weren't believed or it was hushed up what option did they have. He was protected while he was alive.
I have no fascination one way or the other. He was a fabulous, talented performer, without doubt.
But his private life, aside from that, is something I was not privy to. Nor do I know anyone who was.
Albeit very strange behaviour, but strange because it was different to how we perceive 'normal' behaviour (and, lets face it, there are plenty that fit that bill) the fact is that we have a judicial system in place. He was duly tried by that system and was found not guilty. That doesn't mean he was not guilty and we may never know for sure. But.... he went through the system that, as a democratic society, we vote for and subscribe to. If we don't like the system, we should aim to change it but, as it stands, it is what it is.
Anyone who has access to information that the rest of us aren't aware of and, therefore, ARE qualified, should have come forward and achieved the result they were seeking....?!
He is only human, a man borne into sin and that sin was the only life he knew. When knowledge of life is kept from you, you only know what you live. Bless all children.
Regardless of whether you agree or not, I believe the OP put her view and invited other opinions and did so in a civil and courteous way..... so why so angry?
You are entitled to put your viewpoint but is it at all possible you are able to do it without resorting to insults and name-calling?
xxDandelionxx: Wow! So far, that's 1 x idiot and 3 x morons.....
Regardless of whether you agree or not, I believe the OP put her view and invited other opinions and did so in a civil and courteous way..... so why so angry?
You are entitled to put your viewpoint but is it at all possible you are able to do it without resorting to insults and name-calling?
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Do you still believe Michael Jackson is innocence from child abusing?(Vote Below)
Thou he has a long history of charges, his work and songs are anything but creepy,s*xual or evil. . .
And after the Houston fiasco. . . and Jackson kids having a hard time now that they are thrust into the very people he tried to protect, . . they even manage to take the guardian away from his kids, being his mother their grandmother. . . and their actions and words. . .i believe he was framed!