Should the Bush administration be investigated ? ( Archived) (32)

Interesting,the OP has left The Building!

Actually, it's pretty believable.
It's always been that way.

It's just that recently people have begun to notice.

Why don't parties that want GWB and his minions to tried for what crimes.....try them in the World Court? Was good enough for Milosovic and other from the Balkans wars.

Countries that think that they have the legal 'right' to try foreign parties in their courts for acts committed outside of thier countries borders and don't directly involve thier people, or organizations...have lost the concept of jurisdiction. Or have a warped sense of what jurisdiction is.

This is also where Shiara law falls all apart. To think that a group of cleric jurists can sit in Qom, Iran (or elsewhere) and render judgements on both Moslem and non Moslem around the world (e.g. Salman Rushide fatwa and bin Laden's 9/11 fatwa) are little more an kangeroo courts.

Spain fell into this liberal trap as well. Wanted to investigate and try some 6 GBW White House staff. It made great new copy in Europe and the US last fall during the election. But when the Attorney General of Spain realized he did not have a legal standing to the charges all was dropped. Only 6 men have been accused (at least in the public eye)....and not given a day in court.

My advise to those 6.....European and US law suits against each and every media outlet that ran the story....for defamation. And against the Spainsh court that originally made the charges and took briefs on it.

Yes indeed, but not separate conspiracies, it's the same one.

The conspiracy is global, and in fact, globalism is its aim, to unite the entire world into a single economy and totalitarian government.

Supposed "international terrorism" is almost entirely a scam used toward that aim, as are nearly all of the other manufactured crises that we are told threaten to destroy civilization if urgent action isn't undertaken by the government,
such as:
global warming,
disease epidemics,
worldwide economic collapse,
nuclear proliferation,
etc etc etc etc.

Since you mentioned England and Spain let's look at those cases a little closer.

In both cases, supposedly, some terrorist suicide bombers blew up the trains.

But why would anyone suicide themselves just to blow up a carload of civilian strangers. Especially when they could have simply left their bombs on the train and lived to tell the tale.

Suicide bombings are nearly always faked.
A bomb goes off and right away the authorities come up with names and photos and the whole story about the supposed bombers. It's worse than the cheap made for TV movies that they so effectively use to dumb people down.

After the blast they can blame anybody they like and make up a whole story about the organization etc ec. The only way anybodu is going to know its fake is if the supposed suicide bomber turns up alive later (as 9 of the 19 named WTC "suicide hijackers" did).

How come your knowledge of the English Language is fluctuating so much?

If GWB was wrong...it started with the Iraqi WMDs. Some might argue with the 2004 election. But we have seen ACORN now so let us call that a draw. And internal politics of the United States.

Now if we are to believe President Obama...who at the G-20....with France and Britian....just accused Iran of having a undisclosed and secret nuclear processing facility at Qom, Iran.

Now...before you jump back to the WMDs hardened and heated debate attitudes. A couple of thing need to be said and considered. Back in Jan. 2009, just after his oath....they had a joint bi partisan Congressional hearings on Iran and its nuclear material programs. Yours truelly played a role in them. Most likely this Congressional bi partisan committee will get the intell on this new site for more review. GWB did not use Congress to review his Iraq WMD intell, till the vote to invade came.

In other words, the errors of the GWB administration in the Iraq WMDs are being addressed. Better have been addressed. Consider that France, Germany and England made the statement today with President Obama. That early coalition alone is different from the GWBs led path on the Iraqi WMDs.

A question to have you consider. If Iran could get nuclear fuel rods, first from Russia, then Obama's proposed International Fuel Rod bank, and then its own nuclear fuel rod processing program......why does it need a secret and non disclosed nuclear fuel processing facility? If not for weapons?

Last question to consider. If during WWII, Germany, Italy and Japan had learned about the United States's secret nuclear materials and weapons program, then would have said...the three Axis nations will place sanctions on the US to stop their nuclear programs. Do you think that FDR or Truman would have halted the programs?

Pres. A sees the Iran in a conflict with more than Israel. Include the USA, UK, Europe, Persian Gulf Countries, Sunni,
Mushadeen Terrorist from Afghanistan, Mousavi's Green Party, moderate Moslems, and Christianity. In other words.....a World War situation.