no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear? (229)

Dec 8, 2010 11:55 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor: You see the source at the bottom of the article. Israel National News. The news was NOT lies. Oh yes, hammas managed to obtain it. Anyone who doesn't support terrorists is a lier? Wake up and smell the coffee, or words to that effect. This was done as an ad-hoc attack and not in a war situation. I believe your mind is too clouded with hate for Israel that you cannot see the truth.
actually it is pretty easy to get!
At any Chemical Supply House!
Just make sure you store it under water!laugh
To OP anyone differing from his Opinions is automatically a Liar!doh
Dec 8, 2010 12:03 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
NCC1968
NCC1968NCC1968Van Nuys, California USA3 Threads 3 Polls 839 Posts
Some say Israel has nukes....but if they don't and get them.....where will they be placed/stored? The country is not all that big and if they were or will be installed I'd think someone woulda seen the event. If they are stored outside of the borders then that's another set of problems. Maybe they don't actually have any, but certain nations have "given" them "use" of a certainn number to be launched or sent from the hosts lands or vesselsdunno
Dec 8, 2010 12:05 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
time4fun4u
time4fun4utime4fun4uAlicante, Valencia Spain18 Threads 1 Polls 10,066 Posts
NCC1968: Some say Israel has nukes....but if they don't and get them.....where will they be placed/stored? The country is not all that big and if they were or will be installed I'd think someone woulda seen the event. If they are stored outside of the borders then that's another set of problems. Maybe they don't actually have any, but certain nations have "given" them "use" of a certainn number to be launched or sent from the hosts lands or vessels
Cant you keep them in a little aquarium? Whoops,sorry,thats newts doh
Dec 8, 2010 12:08 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
NCC1968
NCC1968NCC1968Van Nuys, California USA3 Threads 3 Polls 839 Posts
time4fun4u: Cant you keep them in a little aquarium? Whoops,sorry,thats newts


Sorta......but the water is on the OUTSIDE and it's made of metal instead of glass and moves around from place to placelaugh
Dec 8, 2010 12:12 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
time4fun4u
time4fun4utime4fun4uAlicante, Valencia Spain18 Threads 1 Polls 10,066 Posts
NCC1968: Sorta......but the water is on the OUTSIDE and it's made of metal instead of glass and moves around from place to place
laugh cheers
Dec 8, 2010 12:34 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts



Future plans for Irans nuclear sites.grin
Dec 8, 2010 12:46 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
moonmana1: These are politcal threads
Ignorance You want to be social, go to other subjects and threads. Stupid is as stupid does I guess.

AS far as attacking conrad... He is more versed and educated on world subjects than you will ever be somenone.
We all come here to get our points accross.. If it hurts your little feeling don't join in on the conversations in the political threads.
Called common sense. This is no place for girlyman
Sorry,had to add that.. Just me today


to the unintelligent man who appear like a soldier, i know that there is a political thread all over CS. In fact i am the one who open this thread and i can tell you that i put it on the category “current events & politics”. However, for your benefit the man i was talking to, the reason he said on the “EU forum....”. he was trying to score a political and racial goals as normal on his attitude.

you already rush to play & sadly lost to call me stupid without me insulting you or call you any name, i think you the one who qualify yourself not only on stupidity but idiocy and moron is only what you should be called. I never attack Conrad; he is the one who always go after me i don’t know why. I plead this man thousand times to leave me alone but he refused. I am not asking him to not comment on my threads or comments on what i said but only to stop attacking me personally; this can be seen nearly in all over, every time i comment.

Concern to your say that he knows more bla,bla,bla: Even though i know that he is the very opposite but i don’t really care on how much he does and i challenge anyone. I don’t feel hurt for anyone who doesn’t agree with me as I hardly agree with anyone. I like that to see a debate is going on and i believe that this is the right of every individual to express his/her view without any fear or threaten and this is what i am asking to have but Conrad want deny me.
Dec 8, 2010 12:49 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: to the unintelligent man who appear like a soldier, i know that there is a political thread all over CS. In fact i am the one who open this thread and i can tell you that i put it on the category “current events & politics”. However, for your benefit the man i was talking to, the reason he said on the “EU forum....”. he was trying to score a political and racial goals as normal on his attitude.

you already rush to play & sadly lost to call me stupid without me insulting you or call you any name, i think you the one who qualify yourself not only on stupidity but idiocy and moron is only what you should be called. I never attack Conrad; he is the one who always go after me i don’t know why. I plead this man thousand times to leave me alone but he refused. I am not asking him to not comment on my threads or comments on what i said but only to stop attacking me personally; this can be seen nearly in all over, every time i comment.

Concern to your say that he knows more bla,bla,bla: Even though i know that he is the very opposite but i don’t really care on how much he does and i challenge anyone. I don’t feel hurt for anyone who doesn’t agree with me as I hardly agree with anyone. I like that to see a debate is going on and i believe that this is the right of every individual to express his/her view without any fear or threaten and this is what i am asking to have but Conrad want deny me.
rolling on the floor laughing Re-read your Posts,Sunshine!laugh
Dec 8, 2010 12:52 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Conrad73: Re-read your Posts,Sunshine!
I NORMALY DO THAT BEFOR I POST not like you who will repeat a comment twice or thrice as you don’t know what you are saying.
Dec 8, 2010 12:53 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia: Future plans for Irans nuclear sites.
Frighteningly awesome!



Small wonder the first Test was Codenamed "TRINITY"!
Dec 8, 2010 12:54 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: I NORMALY DO THAT BEFOR I POST not like you who will repeat a comment twice or thrice as you don’t know what you are saying.
Seems I have to do that in your Case!laugh
Dec 8, 2010 12:58 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: I NORMALY DO THAT BEFOR I POST not like you who will repeat a comment twice or thrice as you don’t know what you are saying.
I actually mean your past ones on the EU-Forum as well as the ones on the Intnl Forum!!
You know!Where you constantly insult all the posters not agreeing with you!
now you have to keep arguing with yourself!
It is getting just too monotonous!
wave
Dec 8, 2010 1:05 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Wow_Factor: Anyone who doesn't support terrorists is a lier? Wake up and smell the coffee, or words to that effect. This was done as an ad-hoc attack and not in a war situation. I believe your mind is too clouded with hate for Israel that you cannot see the truth.
Who’s the really terrorists and everyone don’t support them they will have to be dismiss called names and then force to face like what Julian Assange is going trough right now? If you understand the meaning and explanations of the word “terrorist” in the English dictionary Israel is the really terrorist state as we know that those who oppose Israel’s versions are paying very heavy price.

Why everyone talk on Israel’s action is automatically called names? You the one who should wakeup and smell the coffee. If you are proving something then better you quote from a credible & trustworthy place please.
Dec 8, 2010 1:25 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts
Conrad73: Frighteningly awesome!
Small wonder the first Test was Codenamed "TRINITY"!



The future site of an Iranian Walmart grin
Dec 8, 2010 1:26 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
somone4u: Who’s the really terrorists and everyone don’t support them they will have to be dismiss called names and then force to face like what Julian Assange is going trough right now? If you understand the meaning and explanations of the word “terrorist” in the English dictionary Israel is the really terrorist state as we know that those who oppose Israel’s versions are paying very heavy price.

Why everyone talk on Israel’s action is automatically called names? You the one who should wakeup and smell the coffee. If you are proving something then better you quote from a credible & trustworthy place please.


Quite simply Israel is entitled to its land. It does not attack unless it is to stop the terrorists. Is Israel attacking its enemies every day? No it is not.

Are the terrorists attacking Israeli innocent citizens every day. Yes it is.

Ah well. If that is not simple enough for you I guess you have a problem understanding simple English.
Dec 8, 2010 1:28 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
LILLYLADY
LILLYLADYLILLYLADYunknown, Ohio USA27 Threads 1,293 Posts
somone4u: Please stop the bias lies and baseless words and have some respect to us here. From where the stupid hamass could get white Phosphorous bombs? By the way; where is the link? And who said that? is the IDF? Tell me again is the IDF who said that? Couldn’t you get that truth from a trustworthy people better than the IDF who already USED these weapons and now want say they are not alone? Do you remember who compiled the famous documents which confirmed the behavior of the IDF and the kinds of weapons they USED in 2008/2009?


Iran supplies Hamas with bombs or are did you not know that? Surely you don't think for one second that Iran is going to say that they put phosphorous in the rockets or bombs they sell to Hamas. No way in heck would they say a word.

Or better yet to answer your question above, Jabri in his statement above regarding his tunnels network has already stated that Allah gave him the stuff.(probably via Iran) Surely you've heard of the smuggling tunnels the Israelis have to keep bombing?

It's absurd to think that Hamas won't be getting more advanced weaponry this time from Iran or Syria or wherever and from whomever they can get it from. It should be no surprise to you that they got their hands on phosphorous bombs this time around.
Don't worry who inspected the remains of the bombs....you sure don't think Hamas is going to be truthful and straightforward and say they have phosphorous bombs. They would be silently saying, "Nah, I don't know anything." So with their silence, since Israel was attacked in this case, it is up to Israel to identify what is in the bombs. Now that is your answer.
Dec 8, 2010 1:28 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
odessa49
odessa49odessa49anderson, South Carolina USA9 Posts
Israel should be allowed to have nukes. like most in middle east. there country is unstable.without USA backing Israel. would be a big hole in the ground.
Dec 8, 2010 1:41 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
odessa49: Israel should be allowed to have nukes. like most in middle east. there country is unstable.without USA backing Israel. would be a big hole in the ground.
still wishdreaming,hey Gary?laugh
Dec 8, 2010 1:44 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
odessa49
odessa49odessa49anderson, South Carolina USA9 Posts
they say a zebra cant change his stripes. there pretty close to the truth.
Dec 8, 2010 4:34 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
bahar1975: a thought for you as you are falling asleep..

we live on a lonely planet..try think peace


Hey, I'm all for peace. Reality and idealism rarely meet.
Dec 8, 2010 4:41 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
somone4u: One of the shame & humiliations someone could betray himself in is always when the truth been told his only dismissive argument is that this is Anti-Samatic, Anti-Israel etc,etc and etc. Did you sense that the option which I am sure you voted on this thread is the 1st and is still getting high vote? The truth is the truth you like it or not.



1. I didn't vote.

2. The 'truth' is whatever people want it to be.

3. I'm just bored with this endless nonsense and I care not a whit what you think.
Dec 8, 2010 4:49 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Blues63: 1. I didn't vote.

2. The 'truth' is whatever people want it to be.

3. I'm just bored with this endless nonsense and I care not a whit what you think.
and do you think i care about your Madness? Please think again. I don’t give damn to criminals, i talk my mind and none can stop me on this. You and your................ can threat me or intimidate me but i don’t care. you normaly do that to anyone who dare to tell you to stop the killings and robbing people their lands.
Dec 8, 2010 4:50 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: and do you think i care about your Madness? Please think again. I don’t give damn to criminals, i talk my mind and none can stop me on this. You and your................ can threat me or intimidate me but i don’t care. you normaly do that to anyone who dare to tell you to stop the killings and robbing people their lands.
doh doh doh
Dec 8, 2010 4:52 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: and do you think i care about your Madness? Please think again. I don’t give damn to criminals, i talk my mind and none can stop me on this. You and your................ can threat me or intimidate me but i don’t care. you normaly do that to anyone who dare to tell you to stop the killings and robbing people their lands.
You really have to stop your ad Hominem Attacks!scold
Dec 8, 2010 4:56 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Blues63: Hey, I'm all for peace. Reality and idealism rarely meet.
You as Israel campaigner; if you truly looking for peace then tell YOUR Israel to give up the stolen land, stand up and say enough is enough; you paw so much blood, you oppressed so many for so long, you get so much help from so many around the world for so long. And now is time to stop building bombs and start building love among your neighbours.
Dec 8, 2010 4:57 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Conrad73: You really have to stop your ad Hominem Attacks!
and when you are going to stop?
Dec 8, 2010 4:58 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: You as Israel campaigner; if you truly looking for peace then tell YOUR Israel to give up the stolen land, stand up and say enough is enough; you paw so much blood, you oppressed so many for so long, you get so much help from so many around the world for so long. And now is time to stop building bombs and start building love among your neighbours.
ad Hominem!
Dec 8, 2010 4:59 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: and when you are going to stop?
You're attacking everyone now on such a regular basis ,that you're starting to believe that you are the Victim!scold
Dec 8, 2010 5:05 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Conrad73: You're attacking everyone now on such a regular basis ,that you're starting to believe that you are the Victim!
what is your problem really? please LEAVE, LEAVE, LEAVE MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ALONE.
Dec 8, 2010 5:18 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: Hey Mr this is another direct THREAT from you to me. You always threat me while i don’t really know what i did wrong to you. Mr Conrad i need my life back; i need to be free from your intimidation PLEASE.
Jeepers!
Alright!
But beware about how you talk about me!


Especially since you initiated all!handshake

Share this Poll

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here