no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear? (229)

Dec 7, 2010 10:22 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
FreddyFudpucker
FreddyFudpuckerFreddyFudpuckerObamaville, Indiana USA10,179 Posts
Conrad73: and Florida would seal it off from the South!


I love it when a plan comes together! laugh
Dec 7, 2010 8:08 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
cherryrae
cherryraecherryraesydney, New South Wales Australia390 Posts
AJ1976: Look to me both states are extremist in outlook and pose a danger to mankind at large. In an ideal world neither of the two would have nuclear technology. Hell in an ideal world nobody would have it in the first place!


thumbs up thumbs up thumbs up thumbs up thumbs up
Dec 7, 2010 8:19 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
cherryrae
cherryraecherryraesydney, New South Wales Australia390 Posts
Wow_Factor: Ok someone4u - we are talking about Iran and Israel in particular here, although your original question was broader.

Israel has no inclination for taking over countries, taking over the world, conspiracy theories, New World Order, and all the other absolute rubbish anti-Jewish and anti-Zionists on these forums think about Israel.

Israel wants to live in peace with its neighbours but as a poster above pointed out, Israel cannot because she is surrounded by enemies and Israel is daily bombarded by rockets and attacks on her citizens. Yes, every single day. Do people know that? Well you all do now.

Looking through your past posts on various threads I see you have rather a track record of anti-Israel sentiment, including some of your posts being removed by the moderators, so I can see what sort of views you tend towards.

So Israel needs a nuclear deterrent because there is less likelihood she will be attacked.


Am Yisrael Chai!


but israel has much more land than was initially issued by the UN.

the horrific threat of suicide and mortar bombings, of only which i can sympathise.

but surely to not build these massive monolithic buildings over palestinian yards where no sun can get in, to allow sick palestinian children to be able to get through to the medical help they need, and to make and israeli citizen accountable in the justice system if he committs a crime agaisnt a palestinian.

i am far from condoning what the palestinians do to the israeli's but i'm sure they do not commit these crimes for no reason dunno
Dec 7, 2010 8:35 PM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
ttom500
ttom500ttom500St. Cloud, Florida USA30 Threads 5 Polls 10,523 Posts
cherryrae: but israel has much more land than was initially issued by the UN.

the horrific threat of suicide and mortar bombings, of only which i can sympathise.

but surely to not build these massive monolithic buildings over palestinian yards where no sun can get in, to allow sick palestinian children to be able to get through to the medical help they need, and to make and israeli citizen accountable in the justice system if he committs a crime agaisnt a palestinian.

i am far from condoning what the palestinians do to the israeli's but i'm sure they do not commit these crimes for no reason


Israel secured the lands in nation state wars. Just like North Vet Nam acquired all of South Vet Nam after that war. Isreal as a legitimate country has the right of defense to threats to its national security.

Its nation states wars occurred when massing Muslim armies were gathering to destroy the country. Other times, Isreal...has given back land occupied....both in Gaza and Southern Lebanon. The Golden Heights is a
peace keeping defense zone. Only the small section of the Jerusalem is disputed territory...some 5 square miles of land......is disputed today.

Yet this is enough to keep formal peace treaties from being negotiated and signed.
Dec 8, 2010 12:37 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
ttom500: Israel secured the lands in nation state wars. Just like North Vet Nam acquired all of South Vet Nam after that war. Isreal as a legitimate country has the right of defense to threats to its national security.

Its nation states wars occurred when massing Muslim armies were gathering to destroy the country. Other times, Isreal...has given back land occupied....both in Gaza and Southern Lebanon. The Golden Heights is a
peace keeping defense zone. Only the small section of the Jerusalem is disputed territory...some 5 square miles of land......is disputed today.

Yet this is enough to keep formal peace treaties from being negotiated and signed.
the apartheid state if Israel stole and keep stealing lands from the neighbours simple because she have guns and the western world don’t like to live with the Jews therefore they have to close their eyes on what Israel is doing.
Dec 8, 2010 2:11 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u: the apartheid state if Israel stole and keep stealing lands from the neighbours simple because she have guns and the western world don’t like to live with the Jews therefore they have to close their eyes on what Israel is doing.
scold scold scold
Dec 8, 2010 2:16 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
frustrated These terrorist supporters simply have no idea of what is going on and what Israel has to put up with just to survive as she has a legitimate right to do so.
Dec 8, 2010 2:24 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor: These terrorist supporters simply have no idea of what is going on and what Israel has to put up with just to survive as she has a legitimate right to do so.
OP has been disseminating that Crud for some time now!doh
Dec 8, 2010 2:52 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Wow_Factor: As you and I know, that is pretty typical of those types of people. Very insulting in their tones to others on here which is shown time and time again on the middle-east threads with these supporters of terrorism.

If it were not terrorists and the "great fear" of them, t would it be necessary to allocate huge resources from the state budget ( peoples money) to develop "better and bigger weapons "in quantities that can destroy the whole world dozens of times and to destroy the whole human race?
So Im asking you here now, What is Terrorism about and who are the Terrorists
Dec 8, 2010 3:12 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1: If it were not terrorists and the "great fear" of them, t would it be necessary to allocate huge resources from the state budget ( peoples money) to develop "better and bigger weapons "in quantities that can destroy the whole world dozens of times and to destroy the whole human race?
So Im asking you here now, What is Terrorism about and who are the Terrorists
Looks like Winter came early in your Corner of the Woods!laugh
Dec 8, 2010 5:28 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Raynew1959
Raynew1959Raynew1959Barrington, New Hampshire USA120 Threads 2 Polls 2,218 Posts
Israel would be less inclined to use nukes where Iran would use them
Dec 8, 2010 5:36 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Raynew1959: Israel would be less inclined to use nukes where Iran would use them


I believe you are right.
Dec 8, 2010 5:52 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Conrad73: Looks like Winter came early in your Corner of the Woods!

yep... And Im ready to Terrorize some Women in my neighborhood ...grin
Dec 8, 2010 6:05 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Boban1: yep... And Im ready to Terrorize some Women in my neighborhood ...


Hope you don't take offence, but you know who you remind me of?

devil
Dec 8, 2010 6:05 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1: yep... And Im ready to Terrorize some Women in my neighborhood ...
Can't go far because of the Snow,hmmm?laugh
Dec 8, 2010 6:15 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Wow_Factor: Hope you don't take offence, but you know who you remind me of?

Im not the typ who would take offense ... do tell....laugh
Dec 8, 2010 6:17 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Boban1: Im not the typ who would take offense ... do tell....


Him >>> devil

laugh
Dec 8, 2010 6:23 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
Israel having nuclear weapons is all the deterrent her enemies need.

If Israel lets her guard down for a minute, another Arab coalition will try to wipe her off the face of the Earth. If anyone believes otherwise, they are naive.
Dec 8, 2010 6:26 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Wow_Factor: Him >>>


A fallen Angel ???laugh
hmmmm just cause Im looking for a rich western Woman ... and stir the pot all the time...grin
Dec 8, 2010 6:31 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Blues63: Israel having nuclear weapons is all the deterrent her enemies need.

If Israel lets her guard down for a minute, another Arab coalition will try to wipe her off the face of the Earth. If anyone believes otherwise, they are naive.


Yes, true. Israel is constantly on a high alert status, because anything could happen at any time, plus you have the many incidents happening every day.

A lot of people on these threads look on Israel as an aggressor, but Israel is not. She does precisely what she has to do to survive. Israel is a tiny country as shown below compared to other countries.

I think it is an absolute miracle that she has survived this long thanks to God's protection and Israeli's citizens' brains and bravery.

Dec 8, 2010 6:33 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Boban1: A fallen Angel ???
hmmmm just cause Im looking for a rich western Woman ... and stir the pot all the time...


Well, I am not rich I am sorry to say, and I usually microwave meals!
Dec 8, 2010 6:35 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63: Israel having nuclear weapons is all the deterrent her enemies need.

If Israel lets her guard down for a minute, another Arab coalition will try to wipe her off the face of the Earth. If anyone believes otherwise, they are naive.
Got that right!thumbs up
Dec 8, 2010 6:37 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63: Israel having nuclear weapons is all the deterrent her enemies need.

If Israel lets her guard down for a minute, another Arab coalition will try to wipe her off the face of the Earth. If anyone believes otherwise, they are naive.
Some People,even "Westerners" are just waiting for that to happen!uh oh
Dec 8, 2010 6:39 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Conrad73: Some People,even "Westerners" are just waiting for that to happen!


Yes, sheep in wolves' clothing and even wolves in wolves' clothing, but of course that will never happen. Not in a million years.
Dec 8, 2010 6:42 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
Conrad73: Some People,even "Westerners" are just waiting for that to happen!


Ah...those who fear the 'Zionist Bogeyman' laugh
Dec 8, 2010 6:43 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor: Yes, sheep in wolves' clothing and even wolves in wolves' clothing, but of course that will never happen. Not in a million years.



MASADA!


But NOT like last time!
Dec 8, 2010 6:43 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63: Ah...those who fear the 'Zionist Bogeyman'
Bet they are all Lutherans at Heart!laugh
Dec 8, 2010 6:46 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
this is what i call equal opportunitylaugh
Dec 8, 2010 6:49 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Blues63: Israel having nuclear weapons is all the deterrent her enemies need.

If Israel lets her guard down for a minute, another Arab coalition will try to wipe her off the face of the Earth. If anyone believes otherwise, they are naive.


everyone has its enemies..dancing
Dec 8, 2010 6:50 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Raynew1959: Israel would be less inclined to use nukes where Iran would use them


if not inclined, why have them anywaydunno

and it is not a question of probabilities, it is a question of equalitygrin

Share this Poll

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here