no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear? (229)

Dec 7, 2010 8:11 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
Ok someone4u - we are talking about Iran and Israel in particular here, although your original question was broader.

Israel has no inclination for taking over countries, taking over the world, conspiracy theories, New World Order, and all the other absolute rubbish anti-Jewish and anti-Zionists on these forums think about Israel.

Israel wants to live in peace with its neighbours but as a poster above pointed out, Israel cannot because she is surrounded by enemies and Israel is daily bombarded by rockets and attacks on her citizens. Yes, every single day. Do people know that? Well you all do now.

Looking through your past posts on various threads I see you have rather a track record of anti-Israel sentiment, including some of your posts being removed by the moderators, so I can see what sort of views you tend towards.

So Israel needs a nuclear deterrent because there is less likelihood she will be attacked.


Am Yisrael Chai!
Dec 7, 2010 8:13 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
------ This Post was removed by Moderator ------
Dec 7, 2010 8:13 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
ttom500
ttom500ttom500St. Cloud, Florida USA30 Threads 5 Polls 10,523 Posts
somone4u: I know that you can be much intelligent that that. In fact these comments doesn’t prove to be from an intelligent person but sadly the posit.

Maybe you will answer me on the example of Georgia and Russia.

I am sure that you still remember the consequents of so much power from all past and presents political powers. You can see the mess your country (America) is in after deliberately accused Iraq on non found WMDS. You can see that now even you are paying the price after you carelessly spent over 3trillion on the illegally wars. Now your ex-powerful country has crushed badly in every corner. Millions died in Iraq and millions are stilling suffering because of your arrogant power. Isn’t a lesson? Isn’t a time for us to reduce human arrogance by removing some of the dangerous weapons criminals have?



Here we go again......grin laugh rolling on the floor laughing

What do you call 550 ton of Uranium yellow cake in Iraq? Sneezing powder?
doh
Dec 7, 2010 8:22 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
ttom500
ttom500ttom500St. Cloud, Florida USA30 Threads 5 Polls 10,523 Posts
somone4u: I know that you can be much intelligent that that. In fact these comments doesn’t prove to be from an intelligent person but sadly the posit.

Maybe you will answer me on the example of Georgia and Russia.

I am sure that you still remember the consequents of so much power from all past and presents political powers. You can see the mess your country (America) is in after deliberately accused Iraq on non found WMDS. You can see that now even you are paying the price after you carelessly spent over 3trillion on the illegally wars. Now your ex-powerful country has crushed badly in every corner. Millions died in Iraq and millions are stilling suffering because of your arrogant power. Isn’t a lesson? Isn’t a time for us to reduce human arrogance by removing some of the dangerous weapons criminals have?


I think that he is calling President Obama here a criminal.....with dangerous weapons. Maybe I am wrong.......he is just generalizing and calling all American criminals with dangerous weapons.laugh rolling on the floor laughing grin
Dec 7, 2010 8:23 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Conrad73: Interesting,that anytime someone disagrees with you,you call it personal!I really ought to let Management have a look at that obscene Message you sent me!
Whatever story you would like to make on it always remember that my mine thing on it is to tell you” PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE”
Dec 7, 2010 8:26 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
ttom500: I think that he is calling President Obama here a criminal.....with dangerous weapons. Maybe I am wrong.......he is just generalizing and calling all American criminals with dangerous weapons.
confused So now you want call me to be arrested or killed?dunno
Dec 7, 2010 8:27 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Every Country should have the right to have Nuclear weapon .... it`s either that,or no one
Dec 7, 2010 8:29 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
ttom500
ttom500ttom500St. Cloud, Florida USA30 Threads 5 Polls 10,523 Posts
somone4u: So now you want call me to be arrested or killed?


Not me, I don't have those powers.....but.......sense you mentioned his name indirectly............laugh rolling on the floor laughing grin
Dec 7, 2010 8:31 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
ttom500
ttom500ttom500St. Cloud, Florida USA30 Threads 5 Polls 10,523 Posts
Boban...we should have let the little one have them first. You know Lichenstien....Figi.....Easter island.....then we would have size parity in the world between big and small.
Dec 7, 2010 8:31 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Steve5721
Steve5721Steve5721La Zenia, Murcia Spain72 Threads 2 Polls 4,564 Posts
------ This Post was removed by Moderator ------
Dec 7, 2010 8:34 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1: Every Country should have the right to have Nuclear weapon .... it`s either that,or no one
Pssst!


Know where to get some cheap?uh oh tmi hole
Dec 7, 2010 8:35 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Wow_Factor
Wow_FactorWow_FactorLondon, Greater London, England UK45 Threads 3,698 Posts
------ This Post was removed by Moderator ------
Dec 7, 2010 8:36 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
ttom500: Boban...we should have let the little one have them first. You know Lichenstien....Figi.....Easter island.....then we would have size parity in the world between big and small.
No way,we can't let Liechtenstein have any!
Only a River between them and us!
And the Rhine is very shallow there!
Besides the Bridges aren't guarded!laugh
Dec 7, 2010 8:41 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
ttom500: Boban...we should have let the little one have them first. You know Lichenstien....Figi.....Easter island.....then we would have size parity in the world between big and small.

ah... we`ve lived enough , what are you afraid of , It has to end someday, one way or another ....uh oh
Dec 7, 2010 8:43 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Conrad73: Pssst!Know where to get some cheap?

nope, but I do have a secret recipe for a biological weapon.....
only 300.000 people have to eat beans at the same time ,in the same area ....grin
Dec 7, 2010 8:49 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1: nope, but I do have a secret recipe for a biological weapon.....
only 300.000 people have to eat beans at the same time ,in the same area ....
Not a very predictable Weapon!
And it sounds more like a Chemical One!laugh
You know,"Methane-and-Hydrogen-Sulfide-Attack"!Careful when lighting a Match,and Positively No Smoking!professor
Dec 7, 2010 8:56 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
solitare
solitaresolitareBariloche, Rio Negro Argentina40 Threads 4,041 Posts
somone4u: What you think about the iran-israel nuclear question?

Nuclear what, precisely? Power to generate an easier life for a country's people or mere nuclear bombs in a world dominated by the US who have Plutonium and Neutron bombs and looks for an excuse to use them on a small country that is basically on 'a third world' level with its basic technology???????????
If the US has them, so should everyone else, especially Iran and North Korea; every Arab country, including Gaza under Hamas, the PLO; every Arab country except Saudi Arabia; oh hell, having nuclear,(both for power and self defense should be mandatory as nuclear bombs will forever hang over all countries and all our lives. No one will get rid of them other than to use them, again, especially by those who want to bring on the apocalypse and destroy us all for their insane psychotic religious beliefs...like the so called 'Christian-Zionists' a truly oxymoronic term if there ever was one.
Dec 7, 2010 9:06 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
solitare: Nuclear what, precisely? Power to generate an easier life for a country's people or mere nuclear bombs in a world dominated by the US who have Plutonium and Neutron bombs and looks for an excuse to use them on a small country that is basically on 'a third world' level with its basic technology???????????
If the US has them, so should everyone else, especially Iran and North Korea; every Arab country, including Gaza under Hamas, the PLO; every Arab country except Saudi Arabia; oh hell, having nuclear,(both for power and self defense should be mandatory as nuclear bombs will forever hang over all countries and all our lives. No one will get rid of them other than to use them, again, especially by those who want to bring on the apocalypse and destroy us all for their insane psychotic religious beliefs...like the so called 'Christian-Zionists' a truly oxymoronic term if there ever was one.
I want one to carry in my Wallet!uh oh
Dec 7, 2010 9:08 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts
somone4u: I know that you can be much intelligent that that. In fact these comments doesn’t prove to be from an intelligent person but sadly the posit.

Maybe you will answer me on the example of Georgia and Russia.

I am sure that you still remember the consequents of so much power from all past and presents political powers. You can see the mess your country (America) is in after deliberately accused Iraq on non found WMDS. You can see that now even you are paying the price after you carelessly spent over 3trillion on the illegally wars. Now your ex-powerful country has crushed badly in every corner. Millions died in Iraq and millions are stilling suffering because of your arrogant power. Isn’t a lesson? Isn’t a time for us to reduce human arrogance by removing some of the dangerous weapons criminals have?




What are you talking about? Iraq?Georgia?Russia? This is about Israel & Iran.
Dec 7, 2010 9:31 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
JSuburbia: What are you talking about? Iraq?Georgia?Russia? This is about Israel & Iran.
If you were confused before you came online then please don’t try to take a chance here!!! For your benefit, its sign of wise to read the whole thread before you respond. I said Georgia vs Russia in the two who should ask or been allow to have WMDs to protect herself? I am the one who open the thread and i know what i asked and i know that i started about Iran & Israel
Dec 7, 2010 9:34 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
FreddyFudpucker
FreddyFudpuckerFreddyFudpuckerObamaville, Indiana USA10,179 Posts
JSuburbia: What are you talking about? Iraq?Georgia?Russia? This is about Israel & Iran.



I'm not concerned about Georgia. If worse come to worse, Tennessee and Mississippi would come to their aid.















grin
Dec 7, 2010 9:36 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Steve5721
Steve5721Steve5721La Zenia, Murcia Spain72 Threads 2 Polls 4,564 Posts
somone4u: If you were confused before you came online then please don’t try to take a chance here!!!


That's true JSub, this one here has the expertise of confusing people...he finds it very hard to stay on track with anything and as soon as counter proof is issued...up comes another smokescreen post.

Either that or he disappears.
Dec 7, 2010 9:40 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts
somone4u: If you were confused before you came online then please don’t try to take a chance here!!! For your benefit, its sign of wise to read the whole thread before you respond. I said Georgia vs Russia in the two who should ask or been allow to have WMDs to protect herself? I am the one who open the thread and i know what i asked and i know that i started about Iran & Israel



Why? Georgia has countries that will come to it's aid. The only reason they didn't previously is because they (Georgia) had attacked S.Ossetia, a Russian ally.
Dec 7, 2010 10:09 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia: Do you think Alabama would just sit on the sidelines though? I was kind of thinking they'd be looking for their little bit as well.
A Real Southern Battle Royal!rolling on the floor laughing
Dec 7, 2010 10:12 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts
Conrad73: A Real Southern Battle Royal!
NASCAR?
Dec 7, 2010 10:12 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Steve5721: That's true JSub, this one here has the expertise of confusing people...he finds it very hard to stay on track with anything and as soon as counter proof is issued...up comes another smokescreen post.

Either that or he disappears.
You better get your fact right. Read the comments and think carefully before you bring up your narrowing view.
Dec 7, 2010 10:13 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts
somone4u: You better get your fact right. Read the comments and think carefully before you bring up your narrowing view.



well..it's a fact that you've been banned before isn't it?
Dec 7, 2010 10:15 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
JSuburbia: well..it's a fact that you've been banned before isn't it?
laugh laugh laugh only conrad can do thattongue tongue tongue
Dec 7, 2010 10:15 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia: NASCAR?
WWE!rolling on the floor laughing
Dec 7, 2010 10:17 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
JSuburbia
JSuburbiaJSuburbiaOrbisonia, Pennsylvania USA17 Threads 2,518 Posts
Conrad73: WWE!
LMAO! I was thinking it, but figured NASCAR was a bit more rednecklaugh

Share this Poll

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here