no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear? (229)

Dec 8, 2010 6:52 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
time4fun4u
time4fun4utime4fun4uAlicante, Valencia Spain18 Threads 1 Polls 10,066 Posts
bahar1975: if not inclined, why have them anyway

and it is not a question of probabilities, it is a question of equality
A "feel good" factor?bouquet
Dec 8, 2010 6:53 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Conrad73: Pssst!Know where to get some cheap?


don't bother, they've got it alreadydancing
Dec 8, 2010 6:57 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Conrad73: Not a very predictable Weapon!
And it sounds more like a Chemical One!
You know,"Methane-and-Hydrogen-Sulfide-Attack"!Careful when lighting a Match,and Positively No Smoking!


they say there is a hydro bomb which kills only people and leaves buildings in tact..
good ha.. a beautiful city like Geneva shouldn't go up smoke
Dec 8, 2010 6:58 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
tomcatwarne: The Nuclear bomb is not a defensive weapon, it is a weapon of mass destruction. In my opinion it should be contained to the countries which have it now. Although it's a shame it was discovered in the first place. In the volatile middle east there is more likelyhood it would be used in anger and the ensuing holocaust would be too terrible to contemplate. I am not siding with any side with these comments, as I believe the unleashing of nuclear weapons would lead to destruction on such a massive scale, that the world would be changed. IMO
thumbs up
Dec 8, 2010 6:59 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
bahar1975: everyone has its enemies..


Of course, but few share Israel's enemies.

Dec 8, 2010 6:59 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
time4fun4u: A "feel good" factor?
dunno
Dec 8, 2010 7:00 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Conrad73: Bet they are all Lutherans at Heart!


they already have itwink
Dec 8, 2010 7:00 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
bahar1975: they say there is a hydro bomb which kills only people and leaves buildings in tact..
good ha.. a beautiful city like Geneva shouldn't go up smoke

my vote goes to Laughing gas....we had more than enough killings
Dec 8, 2010 7:02 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
LegsEleven8
LegsEleven8LegsEleven8Melbourne, Victoria Australia11 Threads 253 Posts
I met a beautiful Israeli woman the other week. She is so cute, sweet, and peteat! Oh, wait, what was your question again? rolling on the floor laughing

All I know is that in God's eyes murder is wrong.

grin
Dec 8, 2010 7:02 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975: they say there is a hydro bomb which kills only people and leaves buildings in tact..
good ha.. a beautiful city like Geneva shouldn't go up smoke
thumbs down thumbs down thumbs down
Is that a Threat from Pres. A.?



Besides what you describe is a Neutron-Bomb!






And why Geneva?
Because of all the Foreign Diplomats they could fry?laugh
Dec 8, 2010 7:03 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
JSuburbia: It's a defensive weapon in that, their enemies can be assured, they will be destroyed if they are attacked. It's a deterrant.


that is exactly why iran wants it too

This is why the United States & the Soviet Union never went through a nuclear exchange. Each was assured destruction if one let their missiles fly.
dunno
Dec 8, 2010 7:05 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
JSuburbia: I don't think people realize how much war there would have been without nuclear weapons, as compared to how much war has been prevented with them.

Lord knows us & the soviets would have duked it out....us & china would have gone at it...


very good point..so Iran wants it to to avoid being attacked like Iraq was,
Dec 8, 2010 7:06 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Conrad73: MAD!
Mutually Assured Destruction!
Maybe Israel remembers 1948?


and iran remembers 2003
Dec 8, 2010 7:08 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
somone4u: the The lazy old man have a big problem to differentiate between public & personal attack or response. He always hostile.


may be he should buy a personal nuke to defend himselfconfused
Dec 8, 2010 7:09 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Wow_Factor: Hopefully he will curl up in a ball, suck his thumb and have a sleep. Best thing for him.


wowwwww awwwwblushing
Dec 8, 2010 7:09 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975: and iran remembers 2003
What has happened then?dunno
Dec 8, 2010 7:10 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
Raynew1959: Israel would be less inclined to use nukes where Iran would use them
How you come to that conclusion while you know the kinds of weapons Israel normally use on defenceless stones throwers within mind the White phosphorus Israel USED in gaza in 2008/2009????
Dec 8, 2010 7:11 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
LegsEleven8: I met a beautiful Israeli woman the other week. She is so cute, sweet, and peteat! Oh, wait, what was your question again?

All I know is that in God's eyes murder is wrong.

woow, that`s a face I havn`t seen for quite some time.....cheers
glad to see you back
Dec 8, 2010 7:11 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Boban1: my vote goes to Laughing gas....we had more than enough killings
Killing yourself laughing?rolling on the floor laughing
Dec 8, 2010 7:12 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
what scold ??
as the prverb goes, Death is good, as long as it for the neighbours, not us?dancing
Dec 8, 2010 7:14 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Seems this Thread has finally arrived at it's originally intended Purpose!laugh
Dec 8, 2010 7:15 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Conrad73: What has happened then?


Iraq was attacked then, then iran started thinking about having a DETErRENT as you put it.Cause she witnessed what happened in abugharib , and lately wiki..
Dec 8, 2010 7:15 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63
Blues63Blues63Brisbane, Queensland Australia6 Threads 1 Polls 2,934 Posts
Conrad73: Seems this Thread has finally arrived at it's originally intended Purpose!


Yep, boring in its predictability sleep

Good night Conrad wave
Dec 8, 2010 7:15 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
bahar1975: may be he should buy a personal nuke to defend himself
That man the son he get power we won’t live. He is very oppressive and bulling kind man.
Dec 8, 2010 7:17 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
Conrad73: Is that a Threat from Pres. A.?
Besides what you describe is a Neutron-Bomb!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb
And why Geneva?
Because of all the Foreign Diplomats they could fry?



thans..yes N bumb that is,,

Geneva as an example.don't be scared. Switzerland is always Nutral country, hopefully, you will survive.laugh
Dec 8, 2010 7:17 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
LegsEleven8
LegsEleven8LegsEleven8Melbourne, Victoria Australia11 Threads 253 Posts
Boban1: woow, that`s a face I havn`t seen for quite some time.....
glad to see you back


Boban! hi mate, yea glad ot be back and great to see familiar faces, hows your doggy? hehe
Dec 8, 2010 7:20 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
bahar1975
bahar1975bahar1975qazvin, Iran2 Threads 65 Posts
somone4u: How you come to that conclusion while you know the kinds of weapons Israel normally use on defenceless stones throwers within mind the White phosphorus Israel USED in gaza in 2008/2009????


aww..that was a defensive actwink
Dec 8, 2010 7:21 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
Blues63: Yep, boring in its predictability

Good night Conrad
still have about 12 hours more to go,but I might sign out for a bit my self!laugh wave
Dec 8, 2010 7:21 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
LegsEleven8
LegsEleven8LegsEleven8Melbourne, Victoria Australia11 Threads 253 Posts
bahar1975: a thought for you as you are falling asleep..

we live on a lonely planet..try think peace


Even though we are surrounded by wildlife, bird life, and sea life? rolling on the floor laughing just trying to lighten the mood lol
Dec 8, 2010 7:22 AM CST no for Iran BUT yes for Israel: be the judge who should have nuclear?
somone4u
somone4usomone4uMarseille, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur France21 Threads 5 Polls 307 Posts
bahar1975: very good point..so Iran wants it to to avoid being attacked like Iraq was,
Maybe the idea that northern Korea still alive and doing things on their ways while Saddam is been hanged and his country become the training camp for the western armies is conspiring. I think Iran should be allow to have nuclear for security purpose as America turn the region hostile against iran.

Share this Poll

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here