Hot_Single_Dude: I admire Jimmy Carter for sure and have always told so no matter how hard these repubheads bashing on him for making him look like a monster... Carter have beside Habitat for Humanity helping a lot in New Orleans and else where have tried several time splaying a major part in peace treatment between Israela nd Palsetinians and so on... Obama is still the presidnet and got no time doing as Carter still... wait till 2016 and then Obama will be able to do more good as well.... he is busy now having time as Jimmy Carter does.
Have u kind of checked facts a bout Obama,s acheivments so far i mena those promisses he have kept? Any thing what so ever made you kind of "happy" or some thing?
You are so dang angry on Obama and that shows your points of view is rather short sitet ... you can not name even one good thing done by this president what so ever?
Please stick to reality. While your fantasies ans falsehoods may seem real to you we are not able to hear "the voices" in your head.
ttom500: You want to ask that of a Afghan or Paksitani civilian family that has their house shattered into million pieces by a hellfire missile from a Obama ordered Predator strike?
Remember that micro management thingee?
It is always sooooooooooooooooooooo touchy seeing a Republican crying out loud for casualties of war
Ask the same question form all those Iraqi civilians your bloody guys killed for the sake of damn oil!
Watching Rumsfeld talk on Hannity's show. He says they had video footage of Iraqi soldiers cutting the tongues out of people and other violence toward it's citizens that it was almost unbearable to watch.
ActractorguyTims Ford Lake, Tennessee USA2,089 posts
jlw45: oh i could only imagine....and they were all dancing in the streets when we got saddam out of there...how soon they forget...or atleast dude, anyway... ....and jvaski
I'm guessing that the same has happened in a 100 countries in the last decade... your point is??? Should we illegally invade all those countries. Maybe we should invade TX because some guy drug a black man from the back of his truck until he died??
AGreatGuy2: I'm guessing that the same has happened in a 100 countries in the last decade... your point is??? Should we illegally invade all those countries. Maybe we should invade TX because some guy drug a black man from the back of his truck until he died??
AGreatGuy2: I'm guessing that the same has happened in a 100 countries in the last decade... your point is??? Should we illegally invade all those countries. Maybe we should invade TX because some guy drug a black man from the back of his truck until he died??
texas is a country within itself...you would have to blame jefferson county for that...
The Navy says it's about to start spending money to design women's accommodations for Virginia-class and future ballistic-missile submarines.
The Navy officially lifted the ban on women serving aboard submarines in the spring. Twenty-four women have already begun training to serve as early as the end of this year as officers on ballistic-missile and guided-missile submarines.
The Navy's initial plans did not include enlisted women, or the smaller fast-attack submarines because of the perceived lack of privacy.
Now the Defense Department has notified Congress that the Navy will design the next generation of ballistic-missile submarines with the flexibility to accommodate female crew members. Beginning this fiscal year, the Navy will also study how to reconfigure Virginia-class submarines to bring women on board.
The Navy plans to buy 12 ballistic-missile submarines to replace the 14 current Ohio-class, or Trident, boats that are nearing the end of their service lives. The lead ship in this new class will not be purchased until 2019.
"Design of the Ohio replacement is the next anticipated expenditure of funds in the Navy's approach to assign women within the Submarine Force," the Defense Department stated in its letter to Congress.
The design change is needed should the Navy allow enlisted women to serve on submarines. Female officers can serve on the current ballistic-missile submarines without any modifications to the subs.
"There will be flexibility if our policy changes," Lt. Cmdr. Mark C. Jones, spokesman for the commander of the Submarine Force, said Thursday, adding that "women officers are going to lead the way for the study of the integration of enlisted females."
Electric Boat in Groton, the prime contractor for the Virginia-class program, has been working on the design of the ballistic-missile submarine. A spokesman referred all questions to the Navy.
EB has not yet been asked to make any changes to the Virginia-class design, Jones said. "We're just going to evaluate the possibility," he said. "As we bring women into the Submarine Force, we're looking at different accommodations on different platforms."
Jones could not give a timeline or say how much money would be spent on the endeavors. The letter to Congress stated that the desired flexibility would be "achieved in a fiscally responsible manner."
The Navy says it's about to start spending money to design women's accommodations for Virginia-class and future ballistic-missile submarines.
The Navy officially lifted the ban on women serving aboard submarines in the spring. Twenty-four women have already begun training to serve as early as the end of this year as officers on ballistic-missile and guided-missile submarines.
The Navy's initial plans did not include enlisted women, or the smaller fast-attack submarines because of the perceived lack of privacy.
Now the Defense Department has notified Congress that the Navy will design the next generation of ballistic-missile submarines with the flexibility to accommodate female crew members. Beginning this fiscal year, the Navy will also study how to reconfigure Virginia-class submarines to bring women on board.
The Navy plans to buy 12 ballistic-missile submarines to replace the 14 current Ohio-class, or Trident, boats that are nearing the end of their service lives. The lead ship in this new class will not be purchased until 2019.
"Design of the Ohio replacement is the next anticipated expenditure of funds in the Navy's approach to assign women within the Submarine Force," the Defense Department stated in its letter to Congress.
The design change is needed should the Navy allow enlisted women to serve on submarines. Female officers can serve on the current ballistic-missile submarines without any modifications to the subs.
"There will be flexibility if our policy changes," Lt. Cmdr. Mark C. Jones, spokesman for the commander of the Submarine Force, said Thursday, adding that "women officers are going to lead the way for the study of the integration of enlisted females."
Electric Boat in Groton, the prime contractor for the Virginia-class program, has been working on the design of the ballistic-missile submarine. A spokesman referred all questions to the Navy.
EB has not yet been asked to make any changes to the Virginia-class design, Jones said. "We're just going to evaluate the possibility," he said. "As we bring women into the Submarine Force, we're looking at different accommodations on different platforms."
Jones could not give a timeline or say how much money would be spent on the endeavors. The letter to Congress stated that the desired flexibility would be "achieved in a fiscally responsible manner."
Just add a few johns and maybe a few more mirrors for make up.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Have u kind of checked facts a bout Obama,s acheivments so far i mena those promisses he have kept? Any thing what so ever made you kind of "happy" or some thing?
You are so dang angry on Obama and that shows your points of view is rather short sitet ... you can not name even one good thing done by this president what so ever?
Please stick to reality. While your fantasies ans falsehoods may seem real to you we are not able to hear "the voices" in your head.