Besides my not believing in discrimination, which the Church of England practices by not allowing Muslims the use of existing and unoccupied properties, my OP in this thread is pretty straight forward.
As a volunteer at the OSU James Cancer Center here in Columbus, Ohio USA, I am in frequent contact with many different religions. I have experienced the opposite of what you have during my hours on duty in the cancer center and during the time I spent on a vacation in Israel in 2010.
The only remarkable muslim attitude I saw there was about money. Unlike the Christians and Jews I met in Israel, Muslims were not about their thriving tourist trade.... money.
I see many benefits for everyone if the Church of England would share properties that are unused and deteriorating.. Maintaining unused or unoccupied properties makes no sense to me
If no other benefit is seen by these building being used by others (at other's expense) the occupant would maintain them and the English wouldn't be throwing smoke grenades in them or incur other threats..... I would think.
A lot of people believe in sharing. The Church of England has a expense to maintain the beautiful, important but empty church buildings of worship which exists in most cities there.
Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that sharing these wonderful buildings, along with all their related expenses, could be a very big and positive step forward to improving relations in England and easing tensions among the diverse cultures living there.
Regardless of whether a trial is determined by a judge or jurors, any guilt is based on the weight of the evidence here in the USA. There is nothing difficult about that. Now, court procedure and attorney ego and conduct is something that scares most folks that I know, though.
Sadly, it appears a lot of the posters in this forum have formed opinions without the facts. We call this malicious prejudice.
"Gym owner Adam Pollock may have helped Zimmerman by describing the defendant as soft, fat and not an accomplished athlete in any way, shape or form. In other words, inept at martial arts.
WKMG's Calderon said "the big takeaway was Zimmerman had .5 ability coming in and 1.5 was ability after a year of training."
Anchor Lauren Rowe smiled broadly at the comment.
The takeaway for CNN's Ashleigh Banfield: Zimmerman is awful at fighting."
I agree too about the "case" itself not being a laughing matter. I don't consider the outrageous bigotry and prejudiced remarks and insults, made by some of the CS posters, part of the trial case though.
These type of people don't contribute anything but spin with their remarks, and I try to laugh-off their hame calling and labels which they have thrown at me here and in other threads.
this is just utter nonsense for those who know their rights and know why they carry a gun or carry anything else that can be carried and used to defend one's own life.
galrads Forum Posts (36,283)
Enter two words that often go together or work together # 2
.idiot savant