olaix Forum Posts (1,119)

Women behind the men

You are right about one thing though, it would never work if the girl had a big ego, so humility would probably be required, generosity definitely would be; generosity itself perhaps, and I don't see how the ego would allow that. Then it is not easy, even if it was worth it.

Women behind the men

Hmm.... I think some of your ideas are nice.

You mean it would always mean shadow for the woman? is it impossible for some women to want shadow one place to shine another? or does it mean collar for the girl, and a one way benefit for the guy? Can you explain how it works, especially the channeling, and the function of the virtues you mentioned?
Maybe, if it works, we can see if its acceptable or not.

I think I disagree with this; that women had no choice - it doesn't seem like it would work very well through some form of coercion. I think it is more reasonable that they were in harmony, and cooperated, and simply did it the way they did because it was how it worked best. I think fear and envy, like there would be competition or conflict for the same thing/position, would unmake it from working, what is your opinion?

Women behind the men

Not much thought so far it seems. I'd like to know more.

The missing parts of the world

The people of these countries can't use ConnectingSingles.com I think, at least they are not listed in the search engine

Women behind the men

Hi, you probably heard the expression; behind every great man, there is a woman.

Do you believe its true?
why?
why not?

if yes; how? what would make it, what would break it?

and if it is true - would it be possible for all to "participate", or just the special few?

and in case availability for everyone is correct, including you and I, what would be the price for engaging in such? and what would be the price to not?

The missing parts of the world

Where are them? do we need to call Columbus?

I'm thinking about Africa, Ukraine and Russia (perhaps I missed some).

RE: single Mummy venting!!!

If her kid is 3 years old, he/she leaves at, in USA, what? 16? 18? 21 years old?
Even if she deals with the loneliness, what would do do with the electricity bill?

Basically, madam, my advice to you with be to improve your understanding of how things work, that way you would be less dependent, have more resources, believe less, know more, and in the end, the chances of finding a guy of the same qualities would improve proportionally.

RE: Why are younger guys going after older women?

RE: single Mummy venting!!!

or it could be that guys feel so much pressure from the problem that single moms cry so much about, that some of them contemplate it and realize that it would be a honor, not a burden?

but then again, magical mystery female thinking happens, and that becomes wrong too. LOL

RE: single Mummy venting!!!

Are you sure that those guys did not hypnotize themselves (belief for the win! :D) into thinking and overemphasizing the ideas that they need or should this or that to be eligible for you? and by their combination of understood meanings, habitual thinking, and habitual expression just serves you things not very well thought through, and wouldn't either, if things were more clear?

just a thought

The future

I don't disagree with you on this one. Aristotle was win, and in luck, I haven't read all he has written.
But somehow I come to think about the world champion hooligans who live in Manchester

RE: LIFE AFTER DEATH,???????

Some say death is the beauty of life, others would get hysteric, and call upon evil, for bringing it up :)

The future

Nope, you seem to still miss it.
We, as a specie, individually, collectively, when circumstance and situation is right (or rather, wrong) are still violent.
What all the civilizations you mention just tells you, is that whenever a civilization is in the rise, we are all proud and refusing half of what we see in the mirror - in its collapse, we see humans under a different pressure, and given the same pressure today - people is just as violent, gruesome and greedy as they were 3000 years ago.

When it comes to Greece, I enjoy the period - it does not really have to much to do with the point, but - what threw Athens into its destruction at the time of Pericleas? He took Athens to war with Sparta - the Athenians (there was no "Greece", there was city-states) was athletes, and a lot of their excellence came from their love for creativity and intuition, while the Spartans had the same thing for discipline - their lifestyle was of the warrior.
You probably know King Leonidas I of Sparta, who defended Greece from Xerxes with his 300 soldiers - according to your "reasoning", the 1600 farmers and peasants who fought along them did not exist. But that is beside the point.

The future

Yeah, I am aware of this, but the underlying reason for war has still not changed. That is the point. Civilizations has lived by different systems and probably will continue to live by them, where what is needed and what is done will vary. Right now, we aren't required to arch on sunday because it's not needed, but I'm not sure that we would have so few soldiers if a optimal ratio would be to have more, and that is closer to the point.

The future

Why don't you go read about Socrates, AND examine your conclusions, it would help yourself too.

All your life in-love

hahaha yeah well that seem to be the common movement these days

The future

Well, congratulation for completely missing the point.

RE: single mum

I think what they/ I see is limitation in freedom and options. But by all means, it does not need to be easy as long as the girl is worth it. So we're back to square one :)

The future

Not sure if I agree. The per person should just be statistics, so that is easy. That is, if a billion people the last 12 years, and 6 billion more people the last 111 years did not affect this statistic. Also, if you are thinking about all the states which have nuclear bombs and one wont press the button out of fear of the others retaliation, I guess its not unreasonable.

But - we are not more peaceful creatures than 3000 years ago. I can claim this, because the civilization in classical Greece was according to various professors, works, and the text from that period, one of the more civil civilization of all time, including ours. If you know about it, you know that never before and never after, have so few people done so much, and being remembered so long. There was a not coincidental explosion of art, literature, music, philosophy and science. Most societies and civilization today governs by a version of the forms that came while they advanced their political science. Karl Marx was influenced by Plato, in our courts today, lawyers still use the Socratic method. It was the most notable turning point in human development. You get the picture. The point is, that after Athens did the mistake of going to war and to its destruction against Sparta, the civilization collapsed and the people started to sacrifice other peoples to the Gods.

This civilization is not unique, a few of the civilizations in Latin America was extremely sophisticated as well, and we know the Chinese dynasties, the Rome Empire, the the Mongolian Empire, the Ancient Hindus of India, some more advanced than others. All of them special in their own way. All of them saw both the positive and negative human potential, just as we do today.

Likewise, if you look around you today, in various zones of one type of conflict or another, you will see that when money and structure isn't reaching the masses, blood flows in the street. While I lived in Greece earlier this year, several banks got blown up, and people got killed (one of them was a pregnant girl just exiting her teens). In other zones, you see acts like the Iraqi helicopter shooting, we have suicide bombings, we have deliberate bombing, and some of the terrorists are probably real.

Since the earliest recordings of history til now, we are behaving about the same - thankfully we do have excellent leaders and people who do a genuine effort, but still the world, in my opinion, is at more unrest than at any other time I've heard about, and more dangerous - largely due to its complexity and size.

Basically, science isn't looking at the real problem for this, it can just make this and that item for dummies. Politics tries, religion was more intimate, but all have failed so far.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

changing subject much?

RE: Occupation of other countries.

Yeah but are you saying that I did military service or not? and if you do, what do you mean about it?

RE: Occupation of other countries.

What do you mean?

RE: Occupation of other countries.

LoL. You are in control of "understanding the situation". Do you really think it matters what you call a illegal invasion? Have you heard about the patriots act? I just love that one, not with its patriotic content and message, but how the members who voted on it, according to rumors (the voters witness) they got such a patriotic night to read a 1000+ pages document, with the patriotic message; vote yes or America will see martial law. Just love the imagination of these people, if I was any of them, I'd quit halliburton/ fox/ whitehouse to make twice the money on comic books.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

Indonesia got coup'd if I remember correctly. The king did not accept the west's systems, and monetary plan, and the IMF - after repeatedly refusing to accept, he got killed by one of his generals. This general killed about a million of his own people, but receive support from the west, in form of weapons, and probably bribes, to pull the country into debt and sending most people to the slum. I've seen some of it in documentaries, documentation and just general pictures, does not look pretty. But the most absurd thing I saw was when this general was received by Queen Elizabeth in England in relation to a purchase of some fighter helicopters.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

Well, to you for providing utter rubbish in a matter of this nature.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

Justification is easy, you can justify taking candy from a kid by concluding that the kid is either fat, or will be fat from eating it. That is the true nature of justification - its typically a sign to read between the lines when people start spamming justifications.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

LoL. Reading that kind of stuff, no wonder we're having this conversation. Let me tell you, you can find a donut in the garbage, but it should not be where you go look for food.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

Ooo trick question I can't physically show you that Iraq's WMD did not exist, but none of the "evidences" has ever been documented. And I have looked for them. I challenge you to find online or in any other form, a solid evidence that Iraq had WMD, or Saddam had Bin Laden & co on his "payroll". Maybe you could give them to Colin Powell first if you find, I hear he is still ashamed and embarrassed. There are several ex-service who also would like to know, since, they quit their job not able to serve under the policy of their leaders.

RE: Occupation of other countries.

You are clueless aren't you? Both wars has been a farce, the Iraq war the worst. None of the "evidences" USA & co had prior the invasion was true. Compare that to "UN law". UN is a joke anyway, but who would expect it to be good - only a dreamer, a fool or a thief would claim this (this is debated and explored up and down, if it passed you by, your loss). The invasion and 10 year war in Afghanistan is a joke too. These two war was never about fighting terror and spreading democracy, it was about colonization, and if you think that it is my wish - look at whats going on there - all you will see is death of hundreds of thousands of innocents, their blood, their oil, their minerals, blackwater, halliburton, chemonics inc., and two "governments" who has been coerced to neo-liberal economical policies to "return the favor".

RE: Now it is safe to say that i dislike republican policies more than other policies...

Ah well, the average American probably don't know its election soon, those who do are to stupid to figure out how to vote.
Even if they find out, by help of course, because the average American is now a cradle to grave helpless baby, so guess what they are voting for - more help. Puppets are usually to dumb to recognize their masters and their kleptocracy, but don't worry. Some imaginary super entity with control over the universe will help - as long as his white and scarlet robe boys here on earth don't have to pay taxes to the government :)