Well being religious has two sides. The good side are the nuns and those that highly venerate Jesus and I observe that they are the peaceful religious people. On the one hand, the fanatics, ie, Islam terrorists are the other side of the pole. They are the bad ones.
As I said in response to Mike, my religion is good. It gave me the foundation of believing that there is a higher being. The fundamentals of being kind, good and full of compassion.
Religion was used to unite people in ancient times and it served as a factor in making the organization powerful. I believe that because of the organized religion, the Catholic for instance has accrued too much money and strength in their position. I love my religion, I don't see it to harm anyone who doesn't belong in it.
Mike thank you for joining in. I am sorry its only now that I can jump back in.
No I am not giving the assumption that all Islam is all about violence, nor for any religion for that matter.
What is pervasive at the moment is how the horrific crimes committed by fanatics or religious die hard like those that want to caliphate the world.
If and when the 1.4 billion Islam would all want to kill non islam, then there is a great blood already shed by now.
However, for purposes of clarification, this post is specifically focused on the provision of the Quran "that kills all infidels". This is wrong and I want to find out how it can be changed in order to save the world from annihilation.
If the number is right about 100 people per hour arriving in Germany alone, that's about 2,400 daily. Imagine the impact on the socio-political economic system?
Capri, it would be such an astronomical blunder to be waiting for that to happen. I doubt that all the politicians would just sit and wonder when it will happen.
13,000: The number of migrants to have reached the Greek island of Lesbos in recent days. More than 4,000 made the trip on Saturday from the Turkish coast in rubber dinghies. The usual population of Lesbos is around 86,000 100: The number of migrants reaching Germany per hour 1.2 million: Syrian refugees being housed in Lebanon – a country 100 times smaller than Europe. The total number of refugees who have left Syria is 4.5 million. One in five people in Lebanon is a refugee. 38 per cent: The percentage of migrants from Syria 12 per cent: The percentage of migrants from Afghanistan 1 per cent: Those migrants who land in Italy and Greece who then reach Calais 300 per cent: Increase in the last three months of women as a proportion of the 3,000 migrants passing through Macedonia each day
I am so ashamed to be a woman, just because of her. Her look and demeaning attitude. And she looks like that? To be judgmental to people? And be a humanitarian? You are a real joke Mexican woman.
You are right Chris. She is so arrogant and look at her face, like a man trying to be a woman? Had the guts to tell Maddog, I am not much of a "chola" when in fact she doesn't know who I am. What a joke.
Grow up will you? How insulting are your remarks, "not much Chola? You don't even know me. By the way who gave you the right to match anyone in here? I
I just want your personal comments out of this post.
Tom I can't make it any clearer than to have a very hefty border protection. At least for the economic migrants. For the refugees, I'm sure even that has to be capped. Then simply enough is enough.
I can see we have to conjoined problem here. My question is why can't they protect the border for economic migrants? As far as Merkel's position on the refugees (Syrians due to the war), I knew I wasn't easy to be convinced that there's no hidden agenda behind the gesture. Thousands of arguments came out with that.
I believe there's got to be a serious screening to determine who's refugee and who's not. Either way it's a burden for the whole of Europe.
Well Tom all I can say is that definition is outdated. It has to be revised to be used for political identification. So far Germany use the word refugees, applied to these war displaced people.
I'd definitely put a stop to the coming of economic migrants because if it's not halted then all of them will leave Africa or wherever they came from. Now this will completely ruin European economic and social stability.
Sometimes they never start anything until they're pushed against the wall. They need people like us to make them feel responsible. And if this is left on it's own it is like cancer, it would be too late to fix the damage.
We have established that only the refugees are our concern here.
So if we will build up the camps in NA, and make the Arab rich oil country to foot the expense, let's go. What's the delay?
When I mentioned Australia, it's only for the refugees settled there approved by the government. I'm aware they're turning all boat people back from Asia.
Babb, It's not a question of being filtered or not. Major respectable newspaper like the Wall Street Journal does a good job in headlines about the escalating crises. Blaze and some talk radii are discussing incessantly about the unrest built up by the alarming numbers coming in daily. What amazes me is the lack of the UN's involvement in the assessment of harmful effects it is about to explode by not declaring emergency measures to alleviate the problem.
My suggestion is to gauge how many of these refugees each country can absorb without jeopardizing their economic stability. UN must step up. The whole world should be involved. I know Australia has already been saturated by these refugees.
Religion is great, just how it is used that is bad