NATO vs TRUMP

Here is what all the fuss is about.

Source: Forbes magazine online (a liberal owned publication / website)


Embedded image from another site
Post Comment

Comments (4)

Estonia, Greece and the UK are the only 3 countries that met the 2% of GDP all of the NATO members agreed to pay back in 2014.
The economic of the UN have Zero to do with the economics or administration of other Treaty organizations Although by dragging the UN into this you raise the question what has the UN ever done for the US and why should we support it?
Hi Ken,

I agree with you!thumbs up
We have a nato pact which is true, for now. It doesn't seem right to leave out other bodies, much larger, that could actually offer interference. It has in the past with and with out action for various reasons.

Where will the nato members turn when/if they decide they no longer want to play ball? They have options closer to home if they choose. They may or may not be using them for more than just trade partners already.

Their largest options and other ties could come from the U.N. Potential new pacts to be made from such a large gathering of countries and representatives.

I don't see nato lasting forever or growing much. It seems more clear when considering that there are members trying to cut back rather than meet their agreements.
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.