So what was your thoughts on Reids' comments on Obama's dialect when speaking to particular groups..
Oh here's a good one from Obama.. I think we should be more concerned about our President/VP than a radio talk show host.
"Barack Obama mocks John McCain for not using a computer to send e-mail — despite mainstream media articles dating back to 2000 that report he can’t type because of the war injuries inflicted by his Vietnamese torturers. Who will their next victims be?"
Keeneland: THE GUY HAS NO REASON TO LIE???? Are you for real? He has every reason to lie. If he says there are no WMD's then what does he put in the book. But he says there were and people rush to buy it to find out exactly how they got rid of them. So they flew them out on normal commercial flights? So what airline took them? Iraqi airlines? Syria airlines? WMD airlines?
They just piled WMD's in the luggage departments of normal passanger airliners. No passangers on the planes. Flew them to Syria and unloaded them. And none of the "NORMAL" air traffic from Iraq to Syria was being monitored? Do you realise how stupid and ridicioulas you sound.
Alister Darling the Chief advisor to Tony Blair on the Iraq war has recently admitted in a British Government Inquiry that the knew Iraq had NO WMD's befo re the invasion. This is a senior British advisor admitting this but you are still convinced that there was WMD's? And what is your proof?????? The word of a man who was second in command in the Iraqi Air Force who was trying to sell a book. Googe it. Alister Darling is his name. You will find it on the BBC web site. But the BBC are probably lieing too and Georges Sada is telling us the truth??????????
You don't know much about marketing, sales and sensationalism obviously. If you read the article.. it tells you.. stop making me do your research..
They knew there were WMD's because they were already smuggled out of the country! What an idiotic comment.. seriously.. There's also British officers along with dozens of Iraqi officers saying there were WMD's..
Where is your proof there isn't besides a bad "Drug Bust"
BBC? They are well know to be very biased site that notoriously manipulates or alters surveys' for their beliefs..
countryG: You don't know much about marketing, sales and sensationalism obviously. If you read the article.. it tells you.. stop making me do your research..
They knew there were WMD's because they were already smuggled out of the country! What an idiotic comment.. seriously.. There's also British officers along with dozens of Iraqi officers saying there were WMD's..
Where is your proof there isn't besides a bad "Drug Bust"
BBC? They are well know to be very biased site that notoriously manipulates or alters surveys' for their beliefs..
BBC Biased? Now you really are showing your stupidity. Lets pretend you have a brain for a minute and we are in the real world OK? Lets try this just one more time.
JUST SAYING THERE WERE WMD'S DOES NOT MAKE IT SO. THAT IS NOT PROOF.
If the US and British had any real proof we would have seen it. We would have seen it long ago. Peoples opinions and heresay are not proof!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You went to war with Iraq because the US and Britain said they had WMD's. Thos WMD's were never found. To use your drug bust anology....Its like the Police doing a Drug Bust.....shooting a load of people but not actually finding any drugs or arms in the house.
countryG: Sometimes you prove my point exactly with your comments. Yes.. the media here is very biased towards the left side. It's a well known fact that majority of the media is left winged and that there's a well known beneficial reciprocal relationship.
The liberal news organizations report news that is biased towards the left wing and in return they receive federal contracts and grants.
Many of these news organizations have influence and offices all over the world reporting their side against the right wing, the war, wmd's etc..
Concerning your comment about Democracy and Freedom.. I guess that's why everyone is crossing the borders illegally & legally everyday to come here.
Again I thought the arguement was about the Non WMD's in Iraq but now seems you have lost that one you seem to be onto the press. US media biased to the left wing? We are not talking about press biasism here we are talking about actual freedom of the press to report what is going on to its citizans without government interference. Seems you love posting links here is one for you. Just see how free you press is... And by the way you will notice were my country is ranked.
Keeneland: Again I thought the arguement was about the Non WMD's in Iraq but now seems you have lost that one you seem to be onto the press. US media biased to the left wing? We are not talking about press biasism here we are talking about actual freedom of the press to report what is going on to its citizans without government interference. Seems you love posting links here is one for you. Just see how free you press is... And by the way you will notice were my country is ranked.
Actually this thread is about Rush Limbaugh.. We've discussed WMD's to the ground and we are never going to agree with each other.. So it's pointless. and simple..
countryG: Actually this thread is about Rush Limbaugh.. We've discussed WMD's to the ground and we are never going to agree with each other.. So it's pointless. and simple..
I'm right and you are wrong..
Typical Bush administration comment. No proof needed. Just i am right and you are wrong. Would not expect anything less. Except if Bush said it he probably would have got mixed up and said "I am wrong and you are right".
He was such an intelligent man and brilliant at public speaking, and answeing difficult questions on the spot.
jvaski: Oh,,Come on ....it'll give a glimpse into the mind of a really deranged idiot - who apparently has followers ....
Very funny jvaski, but my NEXT question is who cares? Why are you guys talking about this on a DATING site??? To each his own I guess, but it's not a very "hot" topic according to my Love Dictionary!!
And, no, once again. I just really don't like politics or arguing about politics, or arguing period. Consider me the modern bohemian in exile absentia of apathy and lust and good wine! Seeee ya jvaski - just don't you & country g burst a blood vessel over all this ya hear!
felixis99: Very funny jvaski, but my NEXT question is who cares? Why are you guys talking about this on a DATING site??? To each his own I guess, but it's not a very "hot" topic according to my Love Dictionary!!
And, no, once again. I just really don't like politics or arguing about politics, or arguing period. Consider me the modern bohemian in exile absentia of apathy and lust and good wine! Seeee ya jvaski - just don't you & country g burst a blood vessel over all this ya hear!
But this thread is in the " Current Events and Politics" section? So why read anything in here if you're not interested?
Keeneland: But this thread is in the " Current Events and Politics" section? So why read anything in here if you're not interested?
It wasn't categorized when I found it. SORRY, jeepers!
I'll read what I please. I guess just the name RL was morethan my curiousity could take- like the way people rubberneck a traffic accident!!!
But I am NOT going to watch utube against my will
Actually I do think y'all are kinda funny. I mean it's no big deal (re: country's multi pointing thumbs). I don't think you can make any money, any love, or really effect any tangible change, or solution with this type of discussion. To me (IMO) it's a giant time waster to answer your question. But, hey, that's OK. It's a free country in the US of A. To each his own as I have already said. You & country might say the same thing about the stuff I talk about. Just personal prefs IMO....but my pref is to get personal honey
... The liberal news organizations report news that is biased towards the left wing and in return they receive federal contracts and grants.
Many of these news organizations have influence and offices all over the world reporting their side against the right wing, the war, wmd's etc..
While it's true that the news is engineered. It's certainly not the "left" that controls the media.
In fact the whole left-right political paradigm is just a tool used to control public opinion.
All national media is controlled by the same powerful globalist forces representing the rich and powerful of the world through front groups such as the CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Skull & Bones, CNP, etc.
We the sheeple are presented an entirely stage-managed, pre-fabricated worldview, complete with a totally fictive left-right conflict so that we don't recongnize the growing monolith for what it really is.
RayfromUSA: While it's true that the news is engineered. It's certainly not the "left" that controls the media.
In fact the whole left-right political paradigm is just a tool used to control public opinion.
All national media is controlled by the same powerful globalist forces representing the rich and powerful of the world through front groups such as the CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Skull & Bones, CNP, etc.
We the sheeple are presented an entirely stage-managed, pre-fabricated worldview, complete with a totally fictive left-right conflict so that we don't recongnize the growing monolith for what it really is.
You make interesting points but a little too conspiracy theory for me.. If all the media had the same outlook and views, then I could consider this.
I am very aware of the Blue Bloods and Black Pope and it's very interesting the way things are playing out today in correlation.
I always did find it odd how a guy with very little experience, exposure and barely voted for anything while in the senate became our president. It does appear there was a higher power behind the whole thing . butttt.. it's still hard to believe we are to the point of us being totally manipulated.
You make interesting points but a little too conspiracy theory for me.. If all the media had the same outlook and views, then I could consider this.
I am very aware of the Blue Bloods and Black Pope and it's very interesting the way things are playing out today in correlation.
I always did find it odd how a guy with very little experience, exposure and barely voted for anything while in the senate became our president. It does appear there was a higher power behind the whole thing . butttt.. it's still hard to believe we are to the point of us being totally manipulated.[/quote]
It's a bit like waking up and finding out that your whole sense of "reality" was a sham. It imposes a sort of breakdown and then a rebuilding of your entire worldview from the ground up. It's not easy. But the only alternative is to stay in the Matrix.
CountryG: You make interesting points but a little too conspiracy theory for me.. If all the media had the same outlook and views, then I could consider this.
I am very aware of the Blue Bloods and Black Pope and it's very interesting the way things are playing out today in correlation.
I always did find it odd how a guy with very little experience, exposure and barely voted for anything while in the senate became our president. It does appear there was a higher power behind the whole thing . butttt.. it's still hard to believe we are to the point of us being totally manipulated.
Yes, It's a bit like waking up and finding out that your whole sense of "reality" was a sham. It imposes a sort of breakdown and then a rebuilding of your entire worldview from the ground up. It's not easy. But the only alternative is to stay in the Matrix.
There is no conspiracy, only if you believe there is one along with the other paranoid people who subscribe to that world view that is supported on a loose and highly suspicious and speculative structure. It's not that hard to spin information in order to align it with a conspiracy. That is all. And Obama was elected as our President because he was the best choice to become President---the landslide victory proves that, not some conspiracy.
StressFree: There is no conspiracy, only if you believe there is one along with the other paranoid people who subscribe to that world view that is supported on a loose and highly suspicious and speculative structure. It's not that hard to spin information in order to align it with a conspiracy. That is all. And Obama was elected as our President because he was the best choice to become President---the landslide victory proves that, not some conspiracy.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Oh here's a good one from Obama.. I think we should be more concerned about our President/VP than a radio talk show host.
"Barack Obama mocks John McCain for not using a computer to send e-mail — despite mainstream media articles dating back to 2000 that report he can’t type because of the war injuries inflicted by his Vietnamese torturers. Who will their next victims be?"