There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico ( Archived) (24)

Jul 4, 2010 9:56 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
And, it has a taste for crude oil!



PS I bought some BP stock the other day.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 4, 2010 8:41 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
lifeisadream
lifeisadreamlifeisadreamMexi Go, Mexico State Mexico156 Threads 20 Polls 16,713 Posts
ooby_dooby: And, it has a taste for crude oil!



PS I bought some BP stock the other day.


Unbelievable bureaucracy: Too little tooooo late! shock

"The ship arrived in the Gulf on Wednesday, but officials have wanted to test its capability as well as have the federal Environmental Protection Agency sign off on the water it will pump back into the gulf. Although the ship cleans most of the oil from seawater, trace amounts of crude remain."
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 4, 2010 9:02 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Harleyquinn
HarleyquinnHarleyquinnBetwixt the stix, Illinois USA10 Threads 1,707 Posts
wave



So sadly typical!moping


I still can't believe the moroons are burning it1doh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 4, 2010 9:23 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
lifeisadream: Unbelievable bureaucracy: Too little tooooo late!

"The ship arrived in the Gulf on Wednesday, but officials have wanted to test its capability as well as have the federal Environmental Protection Agency sign off on the water it will pump back into the gulf. Although the ship cleans most of the oil from seawater, trace amounts of crude remain."
Amazing isn't it? Even if half the oil was still in the water they dump back into the gulf it's still better than nothing. All you can do is shake your head at the stupidity of people in high places. Makes you wonder how the hell they got that far. Oh wait, I know how, it's called the "Peter Principal". Look it up.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 2:55 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost
AlbertaghostAlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada76 Threads 5 Polls 5,914 Posts
ooby_dooby: Amazing isn't it? Even if half the oil was still in the water they dump back into the gulf it's still better than nothing. All you can do is shake your head at the stupidity of people in high places.


I don't think that taking a few days or a week to assess it's capabilities is wrong. if it doesn't work that well then they will need more ships to do it with and, if it works really good then fewer will have to be diverted from other spills.

Works both ways. If it were simply deemed to be the perfect tool then no other ships would be required and, in a month or so, to find out it doesn't work that great is too late to have a plan 'b' so, better to know exactly what it can do prior to assigning or, unassigning resources.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 3:10 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost: I don't think that taking a few days or a week to assess it's capabilities is wrong. if it doesn't work that well then they will need more ships to do it with and, if it works really good then fewer will have to be diverted from other spills.

Works both ways. If it were simply deemed to be the perfect tool then no other ships would be required and, in a month or so, to find out it doesn't work that great is too late to have a plan 'b' so, better to know exactly what it can do prior to assigning or, unassigning resources.
Like the Army Corps Of Engineers?
Taking months to assess Jindal's Proposal,then finally rejecting it,saying the environmental Impact is too great!
What about the Impact of the Oil?
What kind of Morons put those Idiots in place?doh frustrated very mad
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 3:11 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
ooby_dooby: Amazing isn't it? Even if half the oil was still in the water they dump back into the gulf it's still better than nothing. All you can do is shake your head at the stupidity of people in high places. Makes you wonder how the hell they got that far. Oh wait, I know how, it's called the "Peter Principal". Look it up.
Look how the Army Corps screwed Jindal!frustrated
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 3:38 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost
AlbertaghostAlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada76 Threads 5 Polls 5,914 Posts
Conrad73: Like the Army Corps Of Engineers?
Taking months to assess Jindal's Proposal,then finally rejecting it,saying the environmental Impact is too great!


no, sort of like exactly what I said. If it works really well, less resources have to be taken away from places where they are better suited. If it doesn't work that well then less have to be taken away and, can be assigned to areas where they are more needed. Like this is not the only spill in the world and, certainly not even close to being the worst and, there will always be others so, resources are still needed in other places.

As well, the ship doesn't run on goodwill but rather money. Who is paying and how much? how much oil can it pick up and how are they being paid and by whom? We know both BP and the US government has money as do the insurance companies however, how much oil can this thing pick up at what water/oil ratio? Will it get paid more for more oil concentrations or less? Will it need to do two passes and how much time will each pass take and is the second pass, if applicable cost the same or less even though the ship is still clocking time?

Conrad73:
What about the Impact of the Oil?
What kind of Morons put those Idiots in place?


Ihave no idea of what the charge is going to be per day for this contraption however, am sure it will be huge. In that way, it is better off picking up large amounts of oil rather than less hence, the cure onshore may prove less expensive in the long run than prevention closer to the actual source. But, we don't know that since we don't know how much this thing can pick up do we?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 3:55 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost: no, sort of like exactly what I said. If it works really well, less resources have to be taken away from places where they are better suited. If it doesn't work that well then less have to be taken away and, can be assigned to areas where they are more needed. Like this is not the only spill in the world and, certainly not even close to being the worst and, there will always be others so, resources are still needed in other places.

As well, the ship doesn't run on goodwill but rather money. Who is paying and how much? how much oil can it pick up and how are they being paid and by whom? We know both BP and the US government has money as do the insurance companies however, how much oil can this thing pick up at what water/oil ratio? Will it get paid more for more oil concentrations or less? Will it need to do two passes and how much time will each pass take and is the second pass, if applicable cost the same or less even though the ship is still clocking time?
Ihave no idea of what the charge is going to be per day for this contraption however, am sure it will be huge. In that way, it is better off picking up large amounts of oil rather than less hence, the cure onshore may prove less expensive in the long run than prevention closer to the actual source. But, we don't know that since we don't know how much this thing can pick up do we?
I was talking mainly about the Berms that were never put up,because of "Environmental Concerns"!doh
Sure glad Oil doesn't spoil the Wetlands as bad as a Sandberm does.dunno confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 4:00 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost
AlbertaghostAlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada76 Threads 5 Polls 5,914 Posts
Conrad73: I was talking mainly about the Berms that were never put up,because of "Environmental Concerns"!
Sure glad Oil doesn't spoil the Wetlands as bad as a Sandberm does.


Sorry. You compared the testing to that so I naturally thought you disagreed with their actions.

The berm/environmental study was BS however, in an administration known for being exactly as Obama was in that he always simply voted 'present' rather than taking a stand, this is no surprise. When faced with a need for action, it falls apart.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 4:14 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost: Sorry. You compared the testing to that so I naturally thought you disagreed with their actions.

The berm/environmental study was BS however, in an administration known for being exactly as Obama was in that he always simply voted 'present' rather than taking a stand, this is no surprise. When faced with a need for action, it falls apart.
The Empty Suit!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 9:07 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost: I don't think that taking a few days or a week to assess it's capabilities is wrong. if it doesn't work that well then they will need more ships to do it with and, if it works really good then fewer will have to be diverted from other spills.

Works both ways. If it were simply deemed to be the perfect tool then no other ships would be required and, in a month or so, to find out it doesn't work that great is too late to have a plan 'b' so, better to know exactly what it can do prior to assigning or, unassigning resources.
You have completely missed the point. Read this very slowly and let it sink in.

"as well as have the federal Environmental Protection Agency sign off on the water it will pump back into the gulf. Although the ship cleans most of the oil from seawater, trace amounts of crude remain."

Who gives a F__K if trace amounts of oil get dumped back into the Gulf HELLO! If the ship can take out a gallon of oil and dump back a teaspoonful does it not sound like success?

You sound like a typical bureaucrat. Do you work for the Canadian gov?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 9:13 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
bodicea
bodiceabodiceacork,county cork, Cork Ireland3 Threads 1 Polls 296 Posts
ooby_dooby: Amazing isn't it? Even if half the oil was still in the water they dump back into the gulf it's still better than nothing. All you can do is shake your head at the stupidity of people in high places. Makes you wonder how the hell they got that far. Oh wait, I know how, it's called the "Peter Principal". Look it up.


thumbs up
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 9:22 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
galrads
galradsgalradsDublin, Ohio USA2,264 Threads 279 Polls 36,283 Posts
ooby_dooby: You have completely missed the point. Read this very slowly and let it sink in.

"as well as have the federal Environmental Protection Agency sign off on the water it will pump back into the gulf. Although the ship cleans most of the oil from seawater, trace amounts of crude remain."

Who gives a F__K if trace amounts of oil get dumped back into the Gulf HELLO! If the ship can take out a gallon of oil and dump back a teaspoonful does it not sound like success?

You sound like a typical bureaucrat. Do you work for the Canadian gov?

We are not talking gallons reduced to a teaspoon....... I believe it would be more like a gallon reduced to something weighing nanograms (one billionth of a gram) or something which can fit within the eye of a micro-sewing needle.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 9:32 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
lifeisadream
lifeisadreamlifeisadreamMexi Go, Mexico State Mexico156 Threads 20 Polls 16,713 Posts
ooby_dooby: Amazing isn't it? Even if half the oil was still in the water they dump back into the gulf it's still better than nothing. All you can do is shake your head at the stupidity of people in high places. Makes you wonder how the hell they got that far. Oh wait, I know how, it's called the "Peter Principal". Look it up.

Ooby Dooby

Brainless people! or Stupid people as the Brit Steve would say!

By the way we already have change the name for the "Gulf of Mexico" in another thread to "Gulf of USico" but still is not definitive in case someone comes with a better idea but please clean it first.
laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 9:57 AM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
kingoswitzerland
kingoswitzerlandkingoswitzerlandsan jose, California USA1 Threads 9 Posts
ooby_dooby: You have completely missed the point. Read this very slowly and let it sink in.

"as well as have the federal Environmental Protection Agency sign off on the water it will pump back into the gulf. Although the ship cleans most of the oil from seawater, trace amounts of crude remain."

Who gives a F__K if trace amounts of oil get dumped back into the Gulf HELLO! If the ship can take out a gallon of oil and dump back a teaspoonful does it not sound like success?

You sound like a typical bureaucrat. Do you work for the Canadian gov?


yes and this is the same reason why many people dont want a govt bureaucrat anywhere near health care decisions, it just their natural way
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 12:51 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
rickjc25
rickjc25rickjc25Dunnellon, Florida USA32 Posts
Conrad you might want to do a teeny little tiny bit of research on the berms jindal wants, you just may find out that his berms will KILL the life in the wetlands because they block off the needed tides. If the wetlands don't get the tides they essentially suffocate. But what the heck lets kill the wetlands with jindal's berms even if the oil doesn't get to them.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 1:04 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
rickjc25: Conrad you might want to do a teeny little tiny bit of research on the berms jindal wants, you just may find out that his berms will KILL the life in the wetlands because they block off the needed tides. If the wetlands don't get the tides they essentially suffocate. But what the heck lets kill the wetlands with jindal's berms even if the oil doesn't get to them.
Tides don't only bring in water from the Surface,not even in Florida!
Sit near the Sore next Hurricane,and watch where the water comes from!
Or just look at a Well ebbing and Flowing with the Tide!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 3:19 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
kingoswitzerland
kingoswitzerlandkingoswitzerlandsan jose, California USA1 Threads 9 Posts
ooby_dooby: Dude, you da man!


you are a nut, hope your BP stock goes up thumbs down
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 5, 2010 8:22 PM CST There's a huge whale in the Gulf of Mexico
Albertaghost
AlbertaghostAlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada76 Threads 5 Polls 5,914 Posts
ooby_dooby: You have completely missed the point. Read this very slowly and let it sink in.

"as well as have the federal Environmental Protection Agency sign off on the water it will pump back into the gulf. Although the ship cleans most of the oil from seawater, trace amounts of crude remain."

Who gives a F__K if trace amounts of oil get dumped back into the Gulf HELLO! If the ship can take out a gallon of oil and dump back a teaspoonful does it not sound like success?


I didn't miss the second point at all and like yourself, find that a ludicrous concern however, they still have to see how much area and to what quality it can clean so as to properly allocate resources. If you will note, I responded to the complete quote and concentrated on the initial point of; "The ship arrived in the Gulf on Wednesday, but officials have wanted to test its capability"

ooby_dooby: You sound like a typical bureaucrat. Do you work for the Canadian gov?


No, I am self employed and do nicely thanks. And you? Wondering, are you angry that they wish to access the contraption's capabilities for the various reasons I explained or just randomly lashing out at other posters?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Stats for this Thread

1,199 Views
23 Comments
Created: Jul 2010
Last Viewed: Apr 17
Last Commented: Jul 2010

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here