"Feds sue big banks over sales of risky investments.
NEW YORK (AP) — The government on Friday sued 17 financial firms, including the largest U.S. banks, for selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac billions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities that turned toxic when the housing market collapsed.
Among those targeted by the lawsuits were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Large European banks including The Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank and Credit Suisse were also sued.
The lawsuits were filed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. It oversees Fannie and Freddie, the two agencies that buy mortgages loans and mortgage securities issued by the lenders."
gininitaly: "Feds sue big banks over sales of risky investments.
NEW YORK (AP) — The government on Friday sued 17 financial firms, including the largest U.S. banks, for selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac billions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities that turned toxic when the housing market collapsed.
Among those targeted by the lawsuits were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Large European banks including The Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank and Credit Suisse were also sued.
The lawsuits were filed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. It oversees Fannie and Freddie, the two agencies that buy mortgages loans and mortgage securities issued by the lenders."http://news.yahoo.com/feds-sue-big-banks-over-sales-risky-investments-000212787.html
and the Looting goes on! Now the Culprit's playing the Victim!
Conrad73: and the Looting goes on! Now the Culprit's playing the Victim!
Isn't that the truth.. ?! But at least they're paying public lip service... or they must be getting worried that people might just be totally fed up... nah, nevermind, I'm sure it's a behind the scenes power play.
gininitaly: Isn't that the truth.. ?! But at least they're paying public lip service... or they must be getting worried that people might just be totally fed up... nah, nevermind, I'm sure it's a behind the scenes power play.
Isn't that the same Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,that didn't want to get audited?
robplum: i dunno what the outcome will be, wont be the ywan, and the US$ sill buys BDT$73.77 today mate
well....as far as i understand,the rate mainly is a reflection of our effort to boost up Bangladeshi exports in the last decade or so. therefore, it is safe to say that the exchange rate doesn't bear so much significance as far as the question of a sliding US economy is concerned.
AlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada5,914 posts
mnowsa: if your solo endeavour was to make me laugh a little, i must say that you have reached the height of success in your endeavour. congratulation!
Good. Your contention was rather silly to say the least so may as well laugh along with me even though my intent was to only expose your unrealistic viewpoint.
mnowsa: As much as i like to see a prosperous USA, the reality is the USA as a country must face the consequence of becoming 'too big and too powerful'
That is a fib.
You totally dislike the idea of a prosperous USA. It causes you nightmare to think what a prosperous US could do in the world. A US that is energy independent of middle east oil.....might.....put some more Islamic dictators out of power. A US that is prosperous....might face off with the RED Dragon (China) in a economic war of all economic wars.
You totally dislike the idea of a prosperous USA. It causes you nightmare to think what a prosperous US could do in the world. A US that is energy independent of middle east oil.....might.....put some more Islamic dictators out of power. A US that is prosperous....might face off with the RED Dragon (China) in a economic war of all economic wars.
Well hang on to those old glory days... they may not be around much longer... you really shouldn't blame Mnowsa for that, we did it to ourselves.
It's come down to 'put your money where you mouth is' and China is holding the markers that we gave away (production/fabrication) or borrowed.
We've been piecemeal selling our soul for quite awhile now.
You totally dislike the idea of a prosperous USA. It causes you nightmare to think what a prosperous US could do in the world. A US that is energy independent of middle east oil.....might.....put some more Islamic dictators out of power. A US that is prosperous....might face off with the RED Dragon (China) in a economic war of all economic wars.
unfortunately, in today's world, a prosperous USA will most likely mean more illegal invasion of other countries killing millions of people. At least the past experience of a prosperous USA suggests so. And as far as a face off with the red dragon is concerned, the reality is china owns almost half of the USA given the fact that total budget of USA is almost (if my memory serves me right) 14 trillion dollars while USA owes china almost 5 trillion dollars. So, i would suggest yo yo to give up the idea of waging an economic war with china..
mnowsa: unfortunately, in today's world, a prosperous USA will most likely mean more illegal invasion of other countries killing millions of people. At least the past experience of a prosperous USA suggests so. And as far as a face off with the red dragon is concerned, the reality is china owns almost half of the USA given the fact that total budget of USA is almost (if my memory serves me right) 14 trillion dollars while USA owes china almost 5 trillion dollars. So, i would suggest yo yo to give up the idea of waging an economic war with china..
As of August 2011, the US owes China 1.7 trillion dollars.. TOTAL "combined" debt owed to other countries is 4.3 trillion.......
Thanks Gin!!! Exactly what I said...except I DID OVER STATE THE AMOUNT US OWES CHINA....
It's not 1.7 trillion, it's 1.2....
We owe Japan between 8 and 9 billion so..........Combined debt to China and Japan would be about half of total debt owed...just a little under half to be more precise...
gininitaly: "Feds sue big banks over sales of risky investments.
NEW YORK (AP) — The government on Friday sued 17 financial firms, including the largest U.S. banks, for selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac billions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities that turned toxic when the housing market collapsed.
Among those targeted by the lawsuits were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Large European banks including The Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank and Credit Suisse were also sued.
The lawsuits were filed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. It oversees Fannie and Freddie, the two agencies that buy mortgages loans and mortgage securities issued by the lenders."http://news.yahoo.com/feds-sue-big-banks-over-sales-risky-investments-000212787.html
Let me see here......Elections coming up real soon.....Ya....that`s about it........
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
NEW YORK (AP) — The government on Friday sued 17 financial firms, including the largest U.S. banks, for selling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac billions of dollars worth of mortgage-backed securities that turned toxic when the housing market collapsed.
Among those targeted by the lawsuits were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Large European banks including The Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank and Credit Suisse were also sued.
The lawsuits were filed by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. It oversees Fannie and Freddie, the two agencies that buy mortgages loans and mortgage securities issued by the lenders."