Why are men who are recently divorced or widowed, more attractive to women ? (43)
lostaboneMissoula, Montana USA22 Threads 8 Polls 57 PostsIt's like women just can't resist trying to get closer to them. Is it because they think they can get the same, that the other woman had with him ? Or is it because they feel sorry for him ?
------ This thread is Archived ------
lostabone: It's like women just can't resist trying to get closer to them. Is it because they think they can get the same, that the other woman had with him ? Or is it because they feel sorry for him ?
I wouldn't say if that's true or untrue. But I will say that women prefer taken men and this is a scientifically proven fact*. Perhaps there's an overlap between taken men and divorced/widowed men? At least divorced/widowed men have proven that they've been able to attract a woman at at least some point in his life. The single man offers no such assurance of his experience. Also, the difference between a taken man and a divorced/widowed is that she doesn't have to indulge in mate stealing to get him, which some women may have a moral qualm against.
*http://www.bakadesuyo.com/2009/10/new-scientist-study-women-prefer-men-who-are/
------ This thread is Archived ------
lostabone: It's like women just can't resist trying to get closer to them. Is it because they think they can get the same, that the other woman had with him ? Or is it because they feel sorry for him ?
Hmm.. not in my case, to be sure. I wouldn't touch either with a 10 ft pole. Friends yes, but for a relationship it's a big NO.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lostabone: It's like women just can't resist trying to get closer to them. Is it because they think they can get the same, that the other woman had with him ? Or is it because they feel sorry for him ?
They certainly wouldn't be to me. What a generalisation
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: They certainly wouldn't be to me. What a generalisation
OK...but do you know a man that if he would be available, you would be interested in him ? Simply because of the way he treated his mate ?
------ This thread is Archived ------
lostabone: OK...but do you know a man that if he would be available, you would be interested in him ? Simply because of the way he treated his mate ?
Simply on that one quality? No.
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: Simply on that one quality? No.
I will remain dubious on your answer.
------ This thread is Archived ------
There is a pointlessness in asking these questions because you can't filter vanity from your responses. You're relying upon self-reporting, and not even anonymous self-reporting at that, from the most image-conscious people of them all.
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion.
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lostabone: I will remain dubious on your answer.
You ask for replies and then deny them?
It would take more than simply how he treats/treated his partner for me to be interested
------ This thread is Archived ------
I think most women attracted to married man 
------ This thread is Archived ------
Leo_7: I think most women attracted to married man
What do you base that on?
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: What do you base that on?
The things some men think... never fails to amaze
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nidifugous: The things some men think... never fails to amaze
Just the ignorants, Nid.
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: What do you base that on?
all my married friends have women running after them.and thats not just here.when i was living in europe was the same thing.when man is single women dont estimate him.but when he has a beatiful woman becide him other women run after him too.my life experiences.
------ This thread is Archived ------
There is a pointlessness in asking these questions because you can't filter vanity from your responses. You're relying upon self-reporting, and not even anonymous self-reporting at that, from the most image-conscious people of them all.
Sounds to me like.......
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion.
Starting with any positive integer n, form a sequence in the following way:
If n is even, divide it by 2 to give n' = n/2.
If n is odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1 to give n' = 3n + 1.
Then take n' as the new starting number and repeat the process. For example:
n = 5 gives the sequence
5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
n = 11 gives the sequence
11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
These are sometimes called "Hailstone sequences" because they go up and down just like a hailstone in a cloud before crashing to Earth - the endless cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1. It seems from experiment that such a sequence will always eventually end in this repeating cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,... and so on, but some values for N generate many values before the repeating cycle begins.
Sounds to me like.......
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion.
Starting with any positive integer n, form a sequence in the following way:
If n is even, divide it by 2 to give n' = n/2.
If n is odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1 to give n' = 3n + 1.
Then take n' as the new starting number and repeat the process. For example:
n = 5 gives the sequence
5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
n = 11 gives the sequence
11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
These are sometimes called "Hailstone sequences" because they go up and down just like a hailstone in a cloud before crashing to Earth - the endless cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1. It seems from experiment that such a sequence will always eventually end in this repeating cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,... and so on, but some values for N generate many values before the repeating cycle begins.
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: What do you base that on?
If not the lying eyes and the real world then there's always the scientific evidence proving the fact to those completely indifferent to the truth(or have social autism).
And I know for certain that wherever I go, and if I'm with my girlfriend, then other women will become more interested in me.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Leo_7: all my married friends have women running after them.and thats not just here.when i was living in europe was the same thing.
when man is single women dont estimate him.but when he has a beatiful woman becide him other women run after him too.my life experiences.
when man is single women dont estimate him.but when he has a beatiful woman becide him other women run after him too.my life experiences.
I think that's what you'd love to believe
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
lostabone: There is a pointlessness in asking these questions because you can't filter vanity from your responses. You're relying upon self-reporting, and not even anonymous self-reporting at that, from the most image-conscious people of them all.
Sounds to me like.......
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion.
Starting with any positive integer n, form a sequence in the following way:
If n is even, divide it by 2 to give n' = n/2.
If n is odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1 to give n' = 3n + 1.
Then take n' as the new starting number and repeat the process. For example:
n = 5 gives the sequence
5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
n = 11 gives the sequence
11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
These are sometimes called "Hailstone sequences" because they go up and down just like a hailstone in a cloud before crashing to Earth - the endless cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1. It seems from experiment that such a sequence will always eventually end in this repeating cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,... and so on, but some values for N generate many values before the repeating cycle begins.
Sounds to me like.......
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion.
Starting with any positive integer n, form a sequence in the following way:
If n is even, divide it by 2 to give n' = n/2.
If n is odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1 to give n' = 3n + 1.
Then take n' as the new starting number and repeat the process. For example:
n = 5 gives the sequence
5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
n = 11 gives the sequence
11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
These are sometimes called "Hailstone sequences" because they go up and down just like a hailstone in a cloud before crashing to Earth - the endless cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1. It seems from experiment that such a sequence will always eventually end in this repeating cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,... and so on, but some values for N generate many values before the repeating cycle begins.
Amazing. So anyway, the only point of a pointless conversation is when the point is not the point. That is, the conversation is a cover for something else which, between single men and women, is usually seduction. But you're not going to seduce women with this question. And probing them for honesty can only attract hostility.
Better to talk about things subjective and emotive where there can be no truth or fact or right and wrong. It's better for a man take an interest in astrology.
------ This thread is Archived ------
unlaoised: I think that's what you'd love to believe
no ,u just dont wanna accept the fact.i m not sure about older ladies but young women r like that.------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
men's perspective towards women
Ladies
The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
wanting beyond need
the way you look
Unions support Democrats!
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Democrats destroyed America
Kultur-multur
your favorite topic?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
2,017 Views
42 Comments
Created: May 2014
Last Viewed: 2 hrs ago
Last Commented: Jun 2014
0 Likes