the right to bear arms (152)
lifeisadream: I do have my children with me so do I have my brothers with me as well and they (my brothers) do work on protecting people Lindsy.
I guess some brothers are better than others.
I guess some brothers are better than others.
You are lucky Life, let me tell you, I have two brothers but my protector was killed on duty for the government of the Philippines. How nice it is indeed to have someone besides you specially children and siblings.
------ This thread is Archived ------
DDawson59: Ironic the Obama / USA Inc Corporation ( yes the federalist system is not a govt but a legal Corporation) supply both sides of the Muslim radical movement with weapons, chemical weapons and ammo and supplies, yet want legal responsible gun owners to give up their mode of defense. Anyone else find that odd? Oh wait communist believe 'govt' is a god so they must obey the supreme p*dophile in political office...idiots. Guns are for protection against criminals with criminal intent using weapons of force. The world is full of them. Why would people be that stupid and give away their guns and rights to have and use one? United Nations with 193 Tyrannical Dictatorship Member countries who kill everyday their citizens. Give up guns is a mandatory death sentence.
D a very powerful illustration there and I do agree with you 100 percent.
Thanks for joining in D.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ccincy: Hard to choose cause either way nuclear bomb or gun obviously don't make us any more less dead.
I think the effect of the gun to harm others is not as bad as the bomb CC. Remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Think of the devastation it does with the new bombs today. yay yay yay.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ccincy: I lived in Val Vista California which is about 4 miles East of Hemet and learned that there were gangs in Hemet.
I have a friend who lives there and it should be a very small town CC and for a gang to exist there, imagine how terrorized they can be.
------ This thread is Archived ------
A professor at UCLA School of Law, writing for the Washington Post, says the battle over the Second Amendment will be won by progressives in the coming years, thanks to a secret weapon.
That weapon is immigrants, says Adam Winkler, a law professor and author of the book “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.”
Read more at
That weapon is immigrants, says Adam Winkler, a law professor and author of the book “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.”
Read more at
------ This thread is Archived ------
true fascism is the merger of government and corporate power into one ~ Mussolini 1922.
------ This thread is Archived ------
stringman: A professor at UCLA School of Law, writing for the Washington Post, says the battle over the Second Amendment will be won by progressives in the coming years, thanks to a secret weapon.
That weapon is immigrants, says Adam Winkler, a law professor and author of the book “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.”Read more at
That weapon is immigrants, says Adam Winkler, a law professor and author of the book “Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America.”Read more at
Wow, that is a such a negative effect on our rights and laws String, if that is the case. I still hope that it wont happen.
------ This thread is Archived ------
JustBrian: true fascism is the merger of government and corporate power into one ~ Mussolini 1922.
Nationalize all corporations and or making them cohorts, that is indeed, the power to that leads to fascism Brian. I believe we are in a dangerous direction then...
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: Wow, that is a such a negative effect on our rights and laws String, if that is the case. I still hope that it wont happen.
give them an inch and they will gradually take all your rights.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: I have a friend who lives there and it should be a very small town CC and for a gang to exist there, imagine how terrorized they can be.
Val Vista was small when I lived there. what it may look like since I left there in 2006 I don't know.Hemet was obviously bigger.
------ This thread is Archived ------
that's Communist Lindsay.. in fascism the corporate powers control the political and the government becomes the enforcement arm of the corporate interests.. exactly what is happening in America today
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: Are you for it? Or NOT?
Why?
This is part of the Constitutional amendment ratified in December 1791.
Although primarily created to arm the citizens against tyrannical rule, today there's a lot of other reasons why it's still in effect.
One of the most debated topic today and I would love to hear the pros and cons. Thanks all for your participation.
Why?
This is part of the Constitutional amendment ratified in December 1791.
Although primarily created to arm the citizens against tyrannical rule, today there's a lot of other reasons why it's still in effect.
One of the most debated topic today and I would love to hear the pros and cons. Thanks all for your participation.
I am for the "Right To Bear Arms"...
Why?
Mostly for protection of self and property.
The Government has become the enemy, and they aren't going to protect us!
So, I support the "right to bear arms"...
nuff said... ~JOHN~
------ This thread is Archived ------
stringman: give them an inch and they will gradually take all your rights.
Wheew String, what a book. I mean if there is any truth in this book, we are heading for a much bigger trouble.
Basically, these rural whites who support gun rights are being replaced by more urban, less white, more liberal voters from Latin America, Asia and the Middle East.
So it’s just a matter of time before demographics take over. He cites polling data that gun control is “extremely popular” with Hispanics, 75 percent of whom allegedly favor “gun safety over gun rights.”
Extract from the book String.
Read more at
------ This thread is Archived ------
TheresMyFriend: I am for the "Right To Bear Arms"...
Why?
Mostly for protection of self and property.
The Government has become the enemy, and they aren't going to protect us!
So, I support the "right to bear arms"...
nuff said... ~JOHN~
Why?
Mostly for protection of self and property.
The Government has become the enemy, and they aren't going to protect us!
So, I support the "right to bear arms"...
nuff said... ~JOHN~
John I am with you.
In your presentation, the original concept is just proven that indeed, a tyrannical rule is up ahead...Very sad John. But like you I am for the Right to bear arms. For my protection from the criminals.
------ This thread is Archived ------
JustBrian: that's Communist Lindsay.. in fascism the corporate powers control the political and the government becomes the enforcement arm of the corporate interests.. exactly what is happening in America today
Yikes Brian. We are in danger then. Our democratic idealism and our Constitutional rights are all corrupted..
------ This thread is Archived ------
protection from criminals.. huh Lindsay?? Washington DC.. the argument can be made that DC actually stands for District of Criminals!! LOL
------ This thread is Archived ------
JustBrian: protection from criminals.. huh Lindsay?? Washington DC.. the argument can be made that DC actually stands for District of Criminals!! LOL
What about protection from tyrannical rule then? Make sense then and it still does Brian.
------ This thread is Archived ------
that was a large part of the founding father's intent behind the second amendment Lindsay.. absolutely.. it wasn't about protecting hunting or sport shooting.. it was about protecting "we the people" against any and all threats against life. liberty and the pursuit of happinesa
------ This thread is Archived ------
I like sleeves.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
The weird and the random facts around the world
Feel Good Music
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Ladies
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
The Best of the GOP
Sleepy Don!
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
wanting beyond need
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Related Forums
- The weird and the random facts around the world
- Feel Good Music
- Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
- Ladies
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- The Best of the GOP
- Sleepy Don!
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- Would you hire this guy - for any job?
- wanting beyond need
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
Thank you so much String.
Agree with you wholeheartedly on that one. Like the post on the crime committed in Ireland. Perhaps would have been a different story if they had some ammunition against the murderers..