New Hampshire has spoken (205)
lindsyjones: This is just the beginning.
Trump is growing with the crowd that is pushing him forward. The conservative and the progressive are just meeting halfway making the flow a bit more enthusiastic than I even anticipated.
The truth is that our political landscape has dramatically changed in response to the incompetence of the current administration.
While, Cruz, Rubio and or Christie are just as capable in making these changes possible (immigration, health, tax control, job creation) it seems America is going forth in the direction of looking for someone that not only has the guts but hopefully can't be bought even by the FR shenanigans but also work toward making this country great again.
Great job New Hampshire.
Trump is growing with the crowd that is pushing him forward. The conservative and the progressive are just meeting halfway making the flow a bit more enthusiastic than I even anticipated.
The truth is that our political landscape has dramatically changed in response to the incompetence of the current administration.
While, Cruz, Rubio and or Christie are just as capable in making these changes possible (immigration, health, tax control, job creation) it seems America is going forth in the direction of looking for someone that not only has the guts but hopefully can't be bought even by the FR shenanigans but also work toward making this country great again.
Great job New Hampshire.
When Barack Obama took office, America’s national debt was $10.6 trillion. It's now $19.0 trillion—an increase of $8.4 trillion in just seven years, or $1.2 trillion per year.
One of the key reasons the Tea Party movement was founded was out of frustration with this skyrocketing debt. Yet Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's proposed tax plan would increase the national debt by $10.1 trillion, according to scoring by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. And that's after taking into account the increased economic growth that Trump's plan would generate. (Without such growth—and liberal scorekeepers would say the Tax Foundation's model is overly generous in projecting growth—Trump's tax plan would increase deficits by $12.0 trillion.)
It's pretty incredible that just one Trump policy proposal would generate more debt than seven years of Obama.
------ This thread is Archived ------
purr4mance: When Barack Obama took office, America’s national debt was $10.6 trillion. It's now $19.0 trillion—an increase of $8.4 trillion in just seven years, or $1.2 trillion per year.
One of the key reasons the Tea Party movement was founded was out of frustration with this skyrocketing debt. Yet Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's proposed tax plan would increase the national debt by $10.1 trillion, according to scoring by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. And that's after taking into account the increased economic growth that Trump's plan would generate. (Without such growth—and liberal scorekeepers would say the Tax Foundation's model is overly generous in projecting growth—Trump's tax plan would increase deficits by $12.0 trillion.)
It's pretty incredible that just one Trump policy proposal would generate more debt than seven years of Obama.
One of the key reasons the Tea Party movement was founded was out of frustration with this skyrocketing debt. Yet Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's proposed tax plan would increase the national debt by $10.1 trillion, according to scoring by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. And that's after taking into account the increased economic growth that Trump's plan would generate. (Without such growth—and liberal scorekeepers would say the Tax Foundation's model is overly generous in projecting growth—Trump's tax plan would increase deficits by $12.0 trillion.)
It's pretty incredible that just one Trump policy proposal would generate more debt than seven years of Obama.
Looking from that position I am sure it doesn't look good and I am not the tax expert guy but what are you saying is that if anyone other than him, there is a better way handling the tax system?
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: This is just the beginning.
Trump is growing with the crowd that is pushing him forward. The conservative and the progressive are just meeting halfway making the flow a bit more enthusiastic than I even anticipated.
The truth is that our political landscape has dramatically changed in response to the incompetence of the current administration.
While, Cruz, Rubio and or Christie are just as capable in making these changes possible (immigration, health, tax control, job creation) it seems America is going forth in the direction of looking for someone that not only has the guts but hopefully can't be bought even by the FR shenanigans but also work toward making this country great again.
Great job New Hampshire.
Trump is growing with the crowd that is pushing him forward. The conservative and the progressive are just meeting halfway making the flow a bit more enthusiastic than I even anticipated.
The truth is that our political landscape has dramatically changed in response to the incompetence of the current administration.
While, Cruz, Rubio and or Christie are just as capable in making these changes possible (immigration, health, tax control, job creation) it seems America is going forth in the direction of looking for someone that not only has the guts but hopefully can't be bought even by the FR shenanigans but also work toward making this country great again.
Great job New Hampshire.
just what is his policy for job creation? so far it appears to me that it is a mystery.
all i ever hear from him is i'll be the best job creator america has ever had.
but how are all these jobs going to be created.
i'm sure that YOU must know as you are supporting him.
can you let me in on the secret?
------ This thread is Archived ------
purr4mance: just what is his policy for job creation? so far it appears to me that it is a mystery.
all i ever hear from him is i'll be the best job creator america has ever had.
but how are all these jobs going to be created.
i'm sure that YOU must know as you are supporting him.
can you let me in on the secret?
all i ever hear from him is i'll be the best job creator america has ever had.
but how are all these jobs going to be created.
i'm sure that YOU must know as you are supporting him.
can you let me in on the secret?
Purr there is no secret, all I know is that he is the one that seems to represent my goals and objectives. Bringing all the outsource job back is one source of this creation. There are so many of them.
You seem to not like him and I would rather that you either listen to all his speeches and if you don't get convinced that is your choice. I would not do that for you.
I am all for him, what he stands for on immigration, safety and transparency. If all that I have enumerated don't seem to work for you then I am afraid I can't do any better.
All I am saying is that the people has decided and I am happy.
And I hope that he will win the GOP.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: Purr there is no secret, all I know is that he is the one that seems to represent my goals and objectives. Bringing all the outsource job back is one source of this creation. There are so many of them.
You seem to not like him and I would rather that you either listen to all his speeches and if you don't get convinced that is your choice. I would not do that for you.
I am all for him, what he stands for on immigration, safety and transparency. If all that I have enumerated don't seem to work for you then I am afraid I can't do any better.
All I am saying is that the people has decided and I am happy.
And I hope that he will win the GOP.
You seem to not like him and I would rather that you either listen to all his speeches and if you don't get convinced that is your choice. I would not do that for you.
I am all for him, what he stands for on immigration, safety and transparency. If all that I have enumerated don't seem to work for you then I am afraid I can't do any better.
All I am saying is that the people has decided and I am happy.
And I hope that he will win the GOP.
Donald Trump vows to bring back the millions of American jobs lost to China and other foreign competitors if voters put him in the White House.
Economists say he wouldn’t stand a chance: Trump’s boundless self-confidence is no match for the global economic forces that took those jobs away.
Since the beginning of 2000, the U.S. economy has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs. A study published last year by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that between 2 million and 2.4 million jobs were lost to competition from China from 1999 to 2011.
Announcing his presidential bid June 16, Trump declared: “I’ll bring back our jobs from China, from Mexico, from Japan, from so many places. I’ll bring back our jobs, and I’ll bring back our money.”
Economists were unimpressed. “It’s completely implausible,” says former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder, a Princeton University economist who has studied the offshoring of American jobs.
Companies shifted low-skill jobs to China in the 2000s because American workers couldn’t compete with Chinese workers earning around $1 an hour. Now China itself is losing low-wage manufacturing jobs to poorer countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam.
If America tried to block foreign-made products and make everything at home, prices would skyrocket and foreign countries would likely retaliate by blocking U.S. goods from their countries. “You can’t turn back the clock,” Blinder says.
But there’s an even bigger problem for those who want to restore U.S. manufacturing employment (now 12.3 million) to its 1979 peak of 19.6 million: Technology has taken many of those jobs for good. Today’s high-tech factories employ a fraction of the workers they used to. General Motors, for example, employed 600,000 in the 1970s. It has 216,000 now — and sells more cars than ever.
------ This thread is Archived ------
purr4mance: Donald Trump vows to bring back the millions of American jobs lost to China and other foreign competitors if voters put him in the White House.
Economists say he wouldn’t stand a chance: Trump’s boundless self-confidence is no match for the global economic forces that took those jobs away.
Since the beginning of 2000, the U.S. economy has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs. A study published last year by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that between 2 million and 2.4 million jobs were lost to competition from China from 1999 to 2011.
Announcing his presidential bid June 16, Trump declared: “I’ll bring back our jobs from China, from Mexico, from Japan, from so many places. I’ll bring back our jobs, and I’ll bring back our money.”
Economists were unimpressed. “It’s completely implausible,” says former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder, a Princeton University economist who has studied the offshoring of American jobs.
Companies shifted low-skill jobs to China in the 2000s because American workers couldn’t compete with Chinese workers earning around $1 an hour. Now China itself is losing low-wage manufacturing jobs to poorer countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam.
If America tried to block foreign-made products and make everything at home, prices would skyrocket and foreign countries would likely retaliate by blocking U.S. goods from their countries. “You can’t turn back the clock,” Blinder says.
But there’s an even bigger problem for those who want to restore U.S. manufacturing employment (now 12.3 million) to its 1979 peak of 19.6 million: Technology has taken many of those jobs for good. Today’s high-tech factories employ a fraction of the workers they used to. General Motors, for example, employed 600,000 in the 1970s. It has 216,000 now — and sells more cars than ever.
Economists say he wouldn’t stand a chance: Trump’s boundless self-confidence is no match for the global economic forces that took those jobs away.
Since the beginning of 2000, the U.S. economy has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs. A study published last year by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that between 2 million and 2.4 million jobs were lost to competition from China from 1999 to 2011.
Announcing his presidential bid June 16, Trump declared: “I’ll bring back our jobs from China, from Mexico, from Japan, from so many places. I’ll bring back our jobs, and I’ll bring back our money.”
Economists were unimpressed. “It’s completely implausible,” says former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Alan Blinder, a Princeton University economist who has studied the offshoring of American jobs.
Companies shifted low-skill jobs to China in the 2000s because American workers couldn’t compete with Chinese workers earning around $1 an hour. Now China itself is losing low-wage manufacturing jobs to poorer countries such as Bangladesh and Vietnam.
If America tried to block foreign-made products and make everything at home, prices would skyrocket and foreign countries would likely retaliate by blocking U.S. goods from their countries. “You can’t turn back the clock,” Blinder says.
But there’s an even bigger problem for those who want to restore U.S. manufacturing employment (now 12.3 million) to its 1979 peak of 19.6 million: Technology has taken many of those jobs for good. Today’s high-tech factories employ a fraction of the workers they used to. General Motors, for example, employed 600,000 in the 1970s. It has 216,000 now — and sells more cars than ever.
Thanks for the info Purr.,
------ This thread is Archived ------
yep,and endorsed the Crazy Duo!
HoodahThunkit?
After Crushing Defeat, DNC Quirk Still Gives Hillary More New Hampshire Delegates Than Sanders
Derek Hunter
Contributor
9:11 AM 02/10/2016
Though Bernie Sanders won the New Hampshire primary in a landslide over Hillary Clinton, he will likely receive fewer delegates than she will.
Sanders won 60 percent of the vote, but thanks to the Democratic Party’s nominating system, he leaves the Granite State with at least 13 delegates while she leaves with at least 15 delegates.
New Hampshire has 24 “pledged” delegates, which are allotted based on the popular vote. Sanders has 13, and Clinton has 9, with 2 currently allotted to neither.
But under Democratic National Committee rules, New Hampshire also has 8 “superdelegates,” party officials who are free to commit to whomever they like, regardless of how their state votes. Their votes count the same as delegates won through the primary.
New Hampshire has 8 superdelegates, 6 of which are committed to Hillary Clinton, giving her a total of 15 delegates from New Hampshire as of Wednesday at 9 a.m.
The state’s 2 remaining superdelegates remain uncommitted.
In the overall delegate count, Clinton holds a commanding lead after a razor-thin victory in Iowa and a shellacking in New Hampshire. Clinton has 394 delegates, both super and electorally assigned, to only 42 for Sanders.
you go figure!
HoodahThunkit?
After Crushing Defeat, DNC Quirk Still Gives Hillary More New Hampshire Delegates Than Sanders
Derek Hunter
Contributor
9:11 AM 02/10/2016
Though Bernie Sanders won the New Hampshire primary in a landslide over Hillary Clinton, he will likely receive fewer delegates than she will.
Sanders won 60 percent of the vote, but thanks to the Democratic Party’s nominating system, he leaves the Granite State with at least 13 delegates while she leaves with at least 15 delegates.
New Hampshire has 24 “pledged” delegates, which are allotted based on the popular vote. Sanders has 13, and Clinton has 9, with 2 currently allotted to neither.
But under Democratic National Committee rules, New Hampshire also has 8 “superdelegates,” party officials who are free to commit to whomever they like, regardless of how their state votes. Their votes count the same as delegates won through the primary.
New Hampshire has 8 superdelegates, 6 of which are committed to Hillary Clinton, giving her a total of 15 delegates from New Hampshire as of Wednesday at 9 a.m.
The state’s 2 remaining superdelegates remain uncommitted.
In the overall delegate count, Clinton holds a commanding lead after a razor-thin victory in Iowa and a shellacking in New Hampshire. Clinton has 394 delegates, both super and electorally assigned, to only 42 for Sanders.
you go figure!
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
String, what a revelation of events that can take place.
Personally there is so much truth in the content of the message specially with the way the voters that are pulled out of nowhere for the GOP. If Trump will not be the choice, me included is not pro Cruz or Rubio at all. I just feel their insincerity of the whole service. And either way, revolution will take place on two different forms.
How troubling is Clinton on her position and I do give her my respect for being so committed amidst all these imbroglios.
Not a very good future String if you ask me.
Personally there is so much truth in the content of the message specially with the way the voters that are pulled out of nowhere for the GOP. If Trump will not be the choice, me included is not pro Cruz or Rubio at all. I just feel their insincerity of the whole service. And either way, revolution will take place on two different forms.
How troubling is Clinton on her position and I do give her my respect for being so committed amidst all these imbroglios.
Not a very good future String if you ask me.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: String, what a revelation of events that can take place.
Personally there is so much truth in the content of the message specially with the way the voters that are pulled out of nowhere for the GOP. If Trump will not be the choice, me included is not pro Cruz or Rubio at all. I just feel their insincerity of the whole service. And either way, revolution will take place on two different forms.
How troubling is Clinton on her position and I do give her my respect for being so committed amidst all these imbroglios.
Not a very good future String if you ask me.
Personally there is so much truth in the content of the message specially with the way the voters that are pulled out of nowhere for the GOP. If Trump will not be the choice, me included is not pro Cruz or Rubio at all. I just feel their insincerity of the whole service. And either way, revolution will take place on two different forms.
How troubling is Clinton on her position and I do give her my respect for being so committed amidst all these imbroglios.
Not a very good future String if you ask me.
it is going to be very interesting year. my hope is that the American people choose wisely.
------ This thread is Archived ------
stringman: it is going to be very interesting year. my hope is that the American people choose wisely.
Ok, Stringman, who is the wisest choice among each part?
------ This thread is Archived ------
If the people in New Hampshire really believe that Trump will be any different then any other political figure who's been our leader also about them doing what is right for our country and not lie totally are walking around with blinders over their eyes.
I was good and didn't repeat myself this time around.
I was good and didn't repeat myself this time around.
------ This thread is Archived ------
purr4mance: When Barack Obama took office, America’s national debt was $10.6 trillion. It's now $19.0 trillion—an increase of $8.4 trillion in just seven years, or $1.2 trillion per year.
One of the key reasons the Tea Party movement was founded was out of frustration with this skyrocketing debt. Yet Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's proposed tax plan would increase the national debt by $10.1 trillion, according to scoring by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. And that's after taking into account the increased economic growth that Trump's plan would generate. (Without such growth—and liberal scorekeepers would say the Tax Foundation's model is overly generous in projecting growth—Trump's tax plan would increase deficits by $12.0 trillion.)
It's pretty incredible that just one Trump policy proposal would generate more debt than seven years of Obama.
One of the key reasons the Tea Party movement was founded was out of frustration with this skyrocketing debt. Yet Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's proposed tax plan would increase the national debt by $10.1 trillion, according to scoring by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. And that's after taking into account the increased economic growth that Trump's plan would generate. (Without such growth—and liberal scorekeepers would say the Tax Foundation's model is overly generous in projecting growth—Trump's tax plan would increase deficits by $12.0 trillion.)
It's pretty incredible that just one Trump policy proposal would generate more debt than seven years of Obama.
I suspect Trump would do a Reagan. Lure you in with tax cuts and then raise taxes 12 times. Maybe even more than 12 as Reagan also got his spending money by beginning the borrowing from China(the biggest part of the debt problem we have today)but we no longer have that kind of leverage over China.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: Maybe you can put it that way but it serves well for the majority? Good luck to all of us. Purr, still you haven't presented any that might represent yours?
trump received 35% of the republican vote in new hampshire.
35% of republican voters is not the majority of registered voters.
65% of republican voters in new hampshire voted for someone other then trump and that is the majority.
------ This thread is Archived ------
TheRedSquirrel87: I suspect Trump would do a Reagan. Lure you in with tax cuts and then raise taxes 12 times. Maybe even more than 12 as Reagan also got his spending money by beginning the borrowing from China(the biggest part of the debt problem we have today)but we no longer have that kind of leverage over China.
trickle down or better known as voodoo economics.
reagan certainly had a-lot of americans bamboozled back then just like trump does today.
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
purr4mance: trump received 35% of the republican vote in new hampshire.
35% of republican voters is not the majority of registered voters.
65% of republican voters in new hampshire voted for someone other then trump and that is the majority.
35% of republican voters is not the majority of registered voters.
65% of republican voters in new hampshire voted for someone other then trump and that is the majority.
I am aware of that Purr, but if you are trying to discredit that he is not the winner then that is just absurd. He didn't get the majority as there are so many of them, who can dispute that? Why is an issue? If he got the majority boy that would be a huge slap for any of the Democrats now wouldn't it?
I feel your dislike Purr and it is okay. The result is loud and clear that he is the best choice of all of them. At least from New Hampshire.
------ This thread is Archived ------
I have always remembered him as the charming politician String.
------ This thread is Archived ------
lindsyjones: I am aware of that Purr, but if you are trying to discredit that he is not the winner then that is just absurd. He didn't get the majority as there are so many of them, who can dispute that? Why is an issue? If he got the majority boy that would be a huge slap for any of the Democrats now wouldn't it?
I feel your dislike Purr and it is okay. The result is loud and clear that he is the best choice of all of them. At least from New Hampshire.
I feel your dislike Purr and it is okay. The result is loud and clear that he is the best choice of all of them. At least from New Hampshire.
don't you read what you write?
in post #11 you posted "but it serves well for the majority?"
that is what i was responding to while posting the percentages in post 17.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
Democrats destroyed America
Ladies
Unions support Democrats!
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
beauty of the heart
I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
s*xual skills
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
12,129 Views
204 Comments
Created: Feb 2016
Last Viewed: 2 hrs ago
Last Commented: Feb 2016
0 Likes
Related Forums
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- Are the ads on here as phony as some of the profiles?
- Democrats destroyed America
- Ladies
- Unions support Democrats!
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
- beauty of the heart
- I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
- s*xual skills
Trump is growing with the crowd that is pushing him forward. The conservative and the progressive are just meeting halfway making the flow a bit more enthusiastic than I even anticipated.
The truth is that our political landscape has dramatically changed in response to the incompetence of the current administration.
While, Cruz, Rubio and or Christie are just as capable in making these changes possible (immigration, health, tax control, job creation) it seems America is going forth in the direction of looking for someone that not only has the guts but hopefully can't be bought even by the FR shenanigans but also work toward making this country great again.
Great job New Hampshire.