If you're of a scientific mind & the one you're interested in/dating/married to is of a philosophical mind, do you think you would be able to relate? In your opinion, would it lead to some great conversations? Or perhaps some huge arguments?
sweetowen: If you're of a scientific mind & the one you're interested in/dating/married to is of a philosophical mind, do you think you would be able to relate? In your opinion, would it lead to some great conversations? Or perhaps some huge arguments?
Any couple who have opposite things in common can get along....it's about respecting one anothers opinions....and not putting them down...because they are different than yours...and when you love someone...that respect should already be in place...so it won't be a hard thing to do....
sweetowen: If you're of a scientific mind & the one you're interested in/dating/married to is of a philosophical mind, do you think you would be able to relate? In your opinion, would it lead to some great conversations? Or perhaps some huge arguments?
I don't see the two necessarily being in conflict at all. Science people generally are interested in ideas, in my experience, and philosophy people are often interested in science (I know I love both!).
I understand what you're saying. The thing is that normally, if you're more scientific, you usually want concrete proof. The philosophical person will give theories, which sometimes can't be proven, but are, at times, taken for fact. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
sweetowen: I understand what you're saying. The thing is that normally, if you're more scientific, you usually want concrete proof. The philosophical person will give theories, which sometimes can't be proven, but are, at times, taken for fact. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Is that addressed to me, Sweet?
You have pointed out a real difference. For example, it's rather difficult if not impossible to quantify many things scientifically whose reality we take for granted - such as love, will, or any human emotion.
It's interesting to note that philosophy essentially mediates science through its understandings of basic logic as it applies to the nature of scientific method (for instance). It's impossible to practice science without certain philosophical premises; on the other hand, good philosophy has to take into account at least some scientific truths (that is, is informed by empirical facts).
What I'm saying is that in many ways they are truly different sides of the same coin - they both need each other to some degree - so there is a good potential dialogue between people who are more interested in one or the other.
There are science-types who eschew some of the messier philosophic issues or who even deny the validity of philosophy altogether; by the same token there are philosophy-types who dislike science. If these cases don't apply, however, the two could have a grand ole time!
I am scientific on many things, but I am also philosophical about many things.
I am smart enough to know that there are many things that we don't have figured out and may never figure out. So rather than refuse to take anything by faith because I do not have it concretely figured out in front of me, I don't worry about it.
You have pointed out a real difference. For example, it's rather difficult if not impossible to quantify many things scientifically whose reality we take for granted - such as love, will, or any human emotion.
It's interesting to note that philosophy essentially mediates science through its understandings of basic logic as it applies to the nature of scientific method (for instance). It's impossible to practice science without certain philosophical premises; on the other hand, good philosophy has to take into account at least some scientific truths (that is, is informed by empirical facts).
What I'm saying is that in many ways they are truly different sides of the same coin - they both need each other to some degree - so there is a good potential dialogue between people who are more interested in one or the other.
There are science-types who eschew some of the messier philosophic issues or who even deny the validity of philosophy altogether; by the same token there are philosophy-types who dislike science. If these cases don't apply, however, the two could have a grand ole time!
DazzleYou: I am scientific on many things, but I am also philosophical about many things.
I am smart enough to know that there are many things that we don't have figured out and may never figure out. So rather than refuse to take anything by faith because I do not have it concretely figured out in front of me, I don't worry about it.
Excellent answer! I was just under the assumption that there was a bigger gap between the two.
sweetowen: I understand what you're saying. The thing is that normally, if you're more scientific, you usually want concrete proof. The philosophical person will give theories, which sometimes can't be proven, but are, at times, taken for fact. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Philosophy is a science... the word means "love of knowledge" You have just stated exactly what a scientist does... it´s all about coming up with theories and proving or disproving them. The big ones like how did the universe happen... have many theories and they are still coming up with new ones and we don´t know if any of them will be proven beyond a doubt.
Philosophers and Scientists are both people who search for truth and knowledge... I can´t imagine a better pair to have great discussions.
I think that it would depend on what there beleifs were, that they plan on installing into the children.. I believe that would be the hardest brickwall to conquer.. But as far as be friends, beliefs, and such are irrelevant. I get along with all kinds of people, but I would only date(marry) someone with the same philosophy as mine.
Tater: I think that it would depend on what there beleifs were, that they plan on installing into the children.. I believe that would be the hardest brickwall to conquer.. But as far as be friends, beliefs, and such are irrelevant. I get along with all kinds of people, but I would only date(marry) someone with the same philosophy as mine.
Which of the philosophy´s would they need to share?
Realism and nominalism Rationalism and empiricism Skepticism Idealism Pragmatism Phenomenology Existentialism Structuralism and post-structuralism The analytic tradition Moral and political philosophy Metaphysics Ethical
Don´t get philosophy confused with religion... while religion is based on philosophy... philosophy is not based on religion.
jbibiza: Which of the philosophy´s would they need to share?
Realism and nominalism Rationalism and empiricism Skepticism Idealism Pragmatism Phenomenology Existentialism Structuralism and post-structuralism The analytic tradition Moral and political philosophy Metaphysics Ethical
Don´t get philosophy confused with religion... while religion is based on philosophy... philosophy is not based on religion.
How about phrenology and Subjectivism I am suprised you missed those lol
jbibiza: Which of the philosophy´s would they need to share?
Realism and nominalism Rationalism and empiricism Skepticism Idealism Pragmatism Phenomenology Existentialism Structuralism and post-structuralism The analytic tradition Moral and political philosophy Metaphysics Ethical
Don´t get philosophy confused with religion... while religion is based on philosophy... philosophy is not based on religion.
Exactly what I was thinking. But they are both beliefs - which is probably what Tater was referring to.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).