Who is going to win the american presidential election in November? Obama or Romney? (874)

You really shouldn't be so astounded considering he has not only failed to improve ANYTHING since becoming president, but he has made a lot ot things much worse.

Don't you think after four years and countless tax payer dollars he could have created some improvement somewhere????? Every single segment of our population, and every program or financial segment, is worse off today than it was four years ago.

Just how long is this man expected to "coast" along blaming Bush?

Just off the top of my head:

Unemployment is over 8 percent.

$16 trillion and climbing despite his promise to cut the debt in half.

No budget has been passed during his term.

A new entitlement passed that is now forecasted to cost more than $1.7 trillion during the next 10 years, plus new reports daily of the miscalculation of costs which double and sometimes triple initial projections. And we STILL don't know "What's in it."

46 million people are receiving food stamps.

More people living in poverty since 2008

An 8.2% decrease in the net worth of almost all Americans SINCE HE TOOK OFFICE.

No plan submitted to save Social Security or Medicare other than to gur Medicare to help pay for Obamacare - which is still woefully underfunded.

Handing Obamacare "exemptions" to 160 of his closest union buddies, congress, and various corporate buddies.

14 million people are projected to lose their employer-sponsored health care.

Gas prices are approaching $4 a gallon.

College tuition is up over 8 percent in 2011.

Foreign policy that has created a Middle East crisis and puts the United States at risk.

$26 billion IOU to taxpayers from General Motors, that will likely never be paid.

National Credit Rating downgraded for the first time in history, not once but TWICE

Freedom rating downgraded multiple points

Misery Index Higher

Complete misuse of stimulus funds (90 percent of Bush's stimulus funds have been repaid. Only 10 percent of Obama's - PLUS he did not use the funds for purposes outlined in the TARP bill).





Now it's your turn..... What has he done that's improved anything?

Have you studied Obama care by your self monte? It is aviable on line and it is easy to send questions a bout it to autorities by phone and by mail... how come you beleive his health care plan will mean "dead" for you ? Who told you this kind of stuff any way? How come it is easy for you beleiving this kind of propoganda?

Romney and his stupid pals claim a lot and "want" a lot but they Won,t do much of all their claims since doing their claims is in no way possible, since cutting taxes for the Rich is the one and only methode they keep falling in to by the one and only way forward ... less taxes for ther ich then no money enough for running the country or creating american jobs as they claim they will! ... and their guys are just waiting taking over in order of making lives of less fortuned americans furter difficult, and calling people names and creating distance and making fun of those who do not have money enough and blaming them for their life situation!


I've read it Dude. You bet I read it - AND I've confirmed a sampling of the excerpts found in this video by comparing it to the actual bill.

In a nutshell, OBAMACARE SUCKS!

Oops... That quote didn't post correctly...


I've read it Dude. You bet I read it - AND I've confirmed a sampling of the excerpts found in this video by comparing it to the actual bill.

In a nutshell, OBAMACARE SUCKS!

For those US voters concerned that there is little difference to which corporate-backed salesperson sits in the Oval Office (R or D), how about a president who is Independent of the same business-as-usual policies?

Check out the Green Party.

At the moment it's a moot point since we only have two candidates to choose from. Down the road? Sure I would consider...but right now I'm more concerned about what Obama will do with another four years and whether or not we would even HAVE another election after that.

As for having an astute, successful businessman over an inept Community Organizer, the choice is clear. Romney at least knows how to surround himself with smart people to delegate important facest of the job, whereas Obama only chose his idealogical friends and cronies who know nothing about the positions they are now sitting in.

Moreover, Romney is good at spotting waste and streamlining operations - something our vast federal government needs very badly.

That's just rude of you to assume, Dude. I'm a single mother of two and you think I'm rich?

Obviously you've never had children.

More on Skewed Polls (yesterday)

The mainstream media-commissioned polls have been far more skewed this election season than most in the past. Typically, many polls would be a little skewed to the Democrats during August and September (remember all those summer leads for Democrats that seemed to evaporate to Republican leads in October?) and then they would switch to surveying likely voters and tone down the skewing in time to report reasonably accurate results by some time in October. But it might be a tall challenge for these pollsters to clean up their act this year, given how far they've been skewed in their polls. For the sake of their credibility, I don't see how they can keep skewing as heavily as they have, yet I also don't see how they can change their ways too much too soon without risking the repudiation of their earlier polls during this election season.

The latest UnSkewed Average of polls at UnSkewedPolls.com shows Mitt Romney leading by 7.8 percent while the latest QStarNews Daily Tracking poll released today shows Romney leading over Obama by a 52 percent to 46 percent. Many of the polls commissioned by mainstream media outlets have been quite skewed, including the series of swing state polls released today by CBS/New York Times/Quinnipiac University. The question is will these pollsters keep skewing their polls to this degree, or perhaps a lesser degree, as we get closer to the election.

I suspect some of these pollsters, for the sake of their credibility, will adjust their methodology and begin reporting lesser skewed polls as the election becomes more near. Additionally, it wouldn't be a surprise if some of the polls are very balanced in their samples in order to produce more accurate results. But some of the polls are so far skewed, that bring them back down to earth would only illustrate how badly skewed the previous polls by those pollsters were, and lead many of us to conclude they knew their earlier polls were too skewed. No polling firm wants to repudiate the accuracy of their earlier polls this way, so expect them to spin the difference in results and try to convince us that their later polls showing Romney winning are because Romney has had a unprecedented surge in the polls due to his campaigning, and not because the polls were skewed in August and September and suddenly more accurate in October.

The major pollsters have never admitted this in the past, but yet it seems like every election I can remember, the Republican nominee was always way behind in the summer and somehow magically closed the gap by October. The conventional wisdom was that we should expect the race to get closer later in the election season and not to question whether earlier polls were skewed and later ones were correct for the sake of pollster credibility.

But this year many of the polls are far more skewed than they have been in the past. To the degree that they are that skewed, I”m not sure some of these pollsters can straighten up and fly right even if they want to. Either way, I'm watching them. And ready to expose them for cleaning up their act or still selling us the same skewed bill of goods. We'll see what happens.

Let your voice be heard, take the QStarNews Daily Tracking Poll, just a few quick questions, and the full QStarNews Poll with many interesting questions.

This is a breaking news alert that just came over the wire. It's "breaking" because they have not yet collected the full story - but expect to see MUCH more of this within the next day or so.

US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm


Published September 27, 2012

FoxNews.com




URGENT: U.S. intelligence officials knew from Day One that the assault on the U.S. Consulate in Libya was a terrorist attack and suspected Al Qaeda-tied elements were involved, sources told Fox News -- though it took the administration a week to acknowledge it.

The account conflicts with claims on the Sunday after the attack by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice that the administration believed the strike was a "spontaneous" event triggered by protests in Egypt over an anti-Islam film.

Sources said the administration internally labeled the attack terrorism from the first day to enable a certain type of policy response, and that officials were looking for one specific suspect.

In addition, sources confirm that FBI agents have not yet arrived in Benghazi in the aftermath of the attack.





I'm going to assume this it true because they would never run a story in this manner without being prepared to back it up. That being the case...just what are we supposed to think when an administration creates such a bald-faced lie?????

Data was recorded by independent party back when he was in office. Including the FED government.

But 8% or 4.1%.......8% or 4.1%.....8% or 4.1%......yes, 4.1% is better.

If Obamaeconomic are so good. Why did the unemployment rate go above his projected 8.0%?

He says it is because those State and Local government are not hiring. He could have changed that. By working with them on shovel ready jobs. But what does do? Promotes high speed rail. A project so massive and complicated that few state were ready to take it on.

This is poor planning at the Federal level. To find out if High speed rail was ready to zoom zoom at the state level....all he had to do make some phone calls. The governors of the States were it was to go in. They would of told him.

But he cannot even jingle up Governor Scott of Florida to find out.

Now they want us to think he is making all these phone calls to foreign leaders....to clam things down in the middle east and to back Israel's play on Iran. If he cannot call a state governor on high speed rail, he is not calling foreign leaders.

As former governor Sununu says.....he has a lousy work ethnic.

Sununu tells this story. Harry Ried needed to get approval from the White House on Friday evening. Ried goes to the WH. He finds everyone in the WH asleep. He had to wake a staffer to wake the President.

Here are a few more Sununu thoughts on the White House:







Everyone know Reid is a Obama surrogate. So Reid comes out with false story. The WH distances itself. But I bet Reid got a gingle from the WH before he did the lying. At least the President is calling someone.

The eschewed polls are using model done in 2008. The problem with that is....the economic crash slanted everything. So they are not even using model from the 2010 mid term. Which was a REP/Tea Party land side.