Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage? (42)

Nov 17, 2016 8:40 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
crayons
crayonscrayonsSt. Jo, Texas USA65 Threads 1,951 Posts
answer... whomever the lame stream home grown commie establishment media
tells me not to believe, Is who I'll Believe,

The establishment lame stream media is dead, and haven't watched MSLSD<CNN< FOX<BBC<CBS<
CNBC>NBC<.>PBS for over a decade.

I have always listened to AJ, 'who always nails it', gerald celente, steve quayle, the hawk,
john b wells, and always read judicial watch, zero hedge, drudge, breitbart, RT, WND.

Georgie Shwartz/Soros has been in the District of Criminals for several days meeting with
the homje grown commies trying to make his billion dollar destabilization investment's
payoff...

by the way i dont use Fakebook or tweeterbird or Googoogaga.

Bottom Line I just had a conference call with google and the sales guy flat out
told me they can manipulate the Algos to whatever they want them to be,
AND they just change the algos a little slower for businesses
so the competition or the sheeple wont notice, its all about who pays them
the most money, or who owes who the most favors.
Nov 17, 2016 9:07 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
I read most of my news. I look at what most of the other networks are "offering".

Townhall has a team with people on both sides. Not bad over all.

The Hill isn't too bad. Dip into Forbes to watch them bounce back and forth. Several other sources including Sky news from the U.K.

I read some of the current trade results from the .gov site. Unemployment vs. actual job creation from the .gov site before checking others for actual analysis. I check the national debt clock and certain states from time to time. Check into some of the bills up, or going up, directly.

It's actually rough on all aspects. So much of the financial, political, and other affects, it's actually rather hard to track it all. The main stream media often make it even harder.
Nov 17, 2016 9:23 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
galrads
galradsgalradsDublin, Ohio USA2,264 Threads 279 Polls 36,283 Posts
Checkers101: Well this one is pretty self explanatory


rolling stone and gq magazines
Nov 17, 2016 10:13 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
epirb
epirbepirbDannevirke, Hawke's Bay New Zealand32 Threads 2 Polls 7,379 Posts
Checkers101: Well this one is pretty self explanatory
none have the complete answer , but ALT had the election buttoned down . There is talk of not letting those outlets the conspired with DNC and Clinton into the White house briefings etc , hope so .
Nov 18, 2016 12:24 AM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Rumples
RumplesRumplesManchester, Greater Manchester, England UK592 Posts
The BBC are the only ones to behave impartially as an organisation because that's mandated. In certain respects they're forced into being fair.

The broadsheets are the least deluded and the most pragmatic. I don't always agree with business and the professionals, however, there's the least ideology and bias coming out of them as individuals.
Nov 18, 2016 12:40 AM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Rumples
RumplesRumplesManchester, Greater Manchester, England UK592 Posts
The Daily Mail and the extremes of youtube are my incompetence measures. If sensible and moderate people ever behave in such a way to prove a single word of the Daily Mail to be true then society has real problems.
Nov 18, 2016 12:43 AM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Rumples
RumplesRumplesManchester, Greater Manchester, England UK592 Posts
Rumples: The Daily Mail and the extremes of youtube are my incompetence measures. If sensible and moderate people ever behave in such a way to prove a single word of the Daily Mail to be true then society has real problems.


Apart from Peter Hitchens. Hitchens isn't a fool.
Nov 18, 2016 3:24 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Kattte
KattteKattteVancouver, British Columbia Canada759 Posts
Rumples: The BBC are the only ones to behave impartially as an organisation because that's mandated. In certain respects they're forced into being fair.

The broadsheets are the least deluded and the most pragmatic. I don't always agree with business and the professionals, however, there's the least ideology and bias coming out of them as individuals.



Ok, I'll agree with the above for the BBC as I do at times find them rather amusing to try and understand the reader speaking into his chin or simply muttering or at times even inventing new and very un-British ways of pronouncing words... or the attempts by a certain reader trying desperately to appear laid-back or nonchalant with his jacket open, extra large tie draped over his lap like a napkin, of a colour that sun-glasses are needed for his seemingly neon attire. This one constantly mumbles and mutters so as to render most stories un-intelligible....(like where in the hell did they find this idiot!?) (Did he even have a basic interview and rehearsal for his news reading??) I bet it was a close friend or relative that hired him...The poor chap also has a problem with his wrists in that he is constantly flicking them, both sideways and up and down; one can only think of someone exaggerating the flamboyance of a drunken drag-queen...BBC news is the best comedy show on TV from Britain...laugh
Nov 18, 2016 3:41 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Elegsabiff
ElegsabiffElegsabiffMotril-ish, Andalusia Spain24 Threads 20 Polls 695 Posts
menu11: NONE!!!


Agreed

The competition is now all about

(A) who can tell the most believable lies devil
(B) who can tell the most outrageous fabrications and still convince at least a few people banana
(C) who can rubbish the truth more comprehensively elephant

moping
Nov 18, 2016 3:53 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Elegsabiff
ElegsabiffElegsabiffMotril-ish, Andalusia Spain24 Threads 20 Polls 695 Posts
During 9/11 when the rumours were becoming hysterical and none of the UK news sources seemed to know what was going on I looked on the Business Day website (a South African newspaper) because it is always factual. They had the known facts and turned out in retrospect to have given the best coverage.

Tended to check with them ever since when rumours are flying - which, these days, seems to be all the time.

They can't possibly last, of course. No one wants facts. rolling on the floor laughing
Nov 18, 2016 4:05 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
KarloradoFL
KarloradoFLKarloradoFLDeLeon Springs, Florida USA50 Threads 3 Polls 9,475 Posts
I watch Deutche Welle (DW) and BBC on a local PBS channel Monday to Friday and NBC News everyday.
Nov 22, 2016 3:07 PM CST Who do you trust more for accurate news coverage?
Bonkers_
Bonkers_Bonkers_Cap. Fed., Buenos Aires Argentina1 Threads 1 Polls 81 Posts
RT !!!!!
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here