Women get more responses than Men (163)
Glitch101: No Tom I'm insulted that you think it acceptable to question a young girl on an open Forum about her religious views.
You raised the issue of religion in this thread,not me or anyone else.Her religious views are not in question.
You raised the issue of religion in this thread,not me or anyone else.Her religious views are not in question.
There's no need to worry about that big bald meany when she's got you going in to bat for her.
Obstinance_Works: (u)There's no need to worry about that big bald meany when she's got you going in to bat for her.
YOu shouldn't talk about her like that
pedalguy59: That is because you disclosed it in an open thread,
this lady did not.
this lady did not.
What did Sooner Gal do, I didn't see anything??????
SoonerGal: I have to agree with you on this one, I didn't see anyone coming to my rescue when I was being eaten alive for my religious standing
there was a big difference, you were eaten a bit but she was only mumbled very little; no chance for eating
MADDOG69: Both probably.
Always the gentleman .
Obstinance_Works: There's no need to worry about that big bald meany when she's got you going in to bat for her.
OW now does that stand for ouch.
Don't like big bald meany's who bully!
Such is the nature of threads to take a number of wildly differing directions away from the original thread topic but this one took a most unfortunate nosedive from being a lighthearted thread to one of interrogation and an interpretation of what forums are used as a tool to keep digging .
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Brannigan70: Such is the nature of threads to take a number of wildly differing directions away from the original thread topic but this one took a most unfortunate nosedive from being a lighthearted thread to one of interrogation and an interpretation of what forums are used as a tool to keep digging .
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
nokundi: there was a big difference, you were eaten a bit but she was only mumbled very little; no chance for eating
Whether eaten or nibbled or in your terms mumbled,we should just try being a little more sensitive in what we post ,don't you think.
The thread wasn't a religious one so no need to question someone's beliefs now was there.
Glitch101: Whether eaten or nibbled or in your terms mumbled,we should just try being a little more sensitive in what we post ,don't you think.
The thread wasn't a religious one so no need to question someone's beliefs now was there.
The thread wasn't a religious one so no need to question someone's beliefs now was there.
Noones religious beliefs were questioned, Are you a bit slow or something
Brannigan70: Such is the nature of threads to take a number of wildly differing directions away from the original thread topic but this one took a most unfortunate nosedive from being a lighthearted thread to one of interrogation and an interpretation of what forums are used as a tool to keep digging .
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Nice to know that I'm not alone in my thoughts.
Nuff said .
Glitch101: Nice to know that I'm not alone in my thoughts.
Nuff said .
Like 2 peas in a pod Nuff said .
Glitch101: Whether eaten or nibbled or in your terms mumbled,we should just try being a little more sensitive in what we post ,don't you think.
The thread wasn't a religious one so no need to question someone's beliefs now was there.
The thread wasn't a religious one so no need to question someone's beliefs now was there.
to be sensitiv is ok i agree, but its not soooo bad if the thread contents other things as just written in the topic, mostly it is more than just in the headline
Brannigan70: Such is the nature of threads to take a number of wildly differing directions away from the original thread topic but this one took a most unfortunate nosedive from being a lighthearted thread to one of interrogation and an interpretation of what forums are used as a tool to keep digging .
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Then there's the mangina expert who came in just as it was coming to the boil
Does anyone ever read these threads or do they just comment off the top of their head
tomcatwarne: Does anyone ever read these threads or do they just comment off the top of their head
I just read the entire thread and your in the wrong.(my opinion)and not first time thinking that
what thread HASN'T got twisted 
tomcatwarne: Noones religious beliefs were questioned, Are you a bit slow or something
Post 51
tomcatwarne: Do you support sharia law???
Post 59
tomcatwarne: No no, you are a Muslim and it's a simple enough question, yes or no will do.
Now who' a bit slow or is it amnesia.
Have a good day.
Glitch101: Post 51
Post 59 Now who' a bit slow or is it amnesia. Have a good day.
Post 59 Now who' a bit slow or is it amnesia. Have a good day.
Those were both questions to her, not questioning her religion, very feeble
SoonerGal: what thread HASN'T got twisted
Agreed Sooner,but to deny what is already in print is a bit futile don't you think.
The thread had no content regards religion,so there was no need to question a young woman about her private life.
Just saying.
Off to have a late lunch and await another storm heading my way.
Glitch101: Agreed Sooner,but to deny what is already in print is a bit futile don't you think.
The thread had no content regards religion,so there was no need to question a young woman about her private life.
Just saying.
Off to have a late lunch and await another storm heading my way.
The thread had no content regards religion,so there was no need to question a young woman about her private life.
Just saying.
Off to have a late lunch and await another storm heading my way.
Glitch101: Agreed Sooner,but to deny what is already in print is a bit futile don't you think.
The thread had no content regards religion,so there was no need to question a young woman about her private life.
Just saying.
Off to have a late lunch and await another storm heading my way.
The thread had no content regards religion,so there was no need to question a young woman about her private life.
Just saying.
Off to have a late lunch and await another storm heading my way.
totally agree
be careful!!pst thata not in the headline 
Scott1812: I have no idea.But they seem to get more.
serene56: Yeah men are quite blatant about their perving
They turn their head to check you out, and even cop a second look if they want lol, women can scope a guy without moving a muscle
They turn their head to check you out, and even cop a second look if they want lol, women can scope a guy without moving a muscle
StillOfTheNight: I tend to think yes
Women get more responses than Men
I'd think most of the scammers are men! 
I'd think most of the scammers are men!
abcWOMAN: Women get more responses than Men
I'd think most of the scammers are men!
I'd think most of the scammers are men!
you say this coz you are a woman
onmy side i only know female scammers here on cs
Cinnamon86: i cant understad how people could be like that in this..age
u mean over 50 ?nokundi: would you answer this question here? leo?
yes or no
i normally dont answer provocative questions.yes or no
More Threads
other can see but not you
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
your personality
men's perspective towards women
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
Feel Good Music
Sleepy Don!
wanting beyond need
The Best of the GOP
the way you look
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
this lady did not.