BnaturAl Forum Posts (6,811)

RE: Signs the person your seeing is a LOON!!!

their favorite and most used phrase is "trust me babe"

RE: Signs the person your seeing is a LOON!!!

I was having trouble with my brakes!!!

RE: Signs the person your seeing is a LOON!!!

they are still receiving pills by mail or a delivery truck driver in white coat.

RE: Its so cold out......How cold is it?

awwww, they took away your cool shades and enchanting smile!

RE: Hi I am new here

RE: what do you think about people on connectingsingles that start threads about other members ?

I hereby recind any heartfelt apologies I made to you Sir. You are at the very least undeserving.

RE: what do you think about people on connectingsingles that start threads about other members ?

Your words Sir.-------
most of wouldn't be here if they had their way. first they prey on who they think are gullible.....by
1.rallying support from people now on a topic they think people might fall for ...just at the right time.-end
BnaturAl Says:
It is indeed' you' who rallies support and quotes that support later in your post showing off 'your' support, pointing to being mailed, flowered, saying and I quote- "by the way i'd love to thank everybody for their flowers and e-mails yesterday ... i never knew i had so many freinds on this website" end quote.
So you now have the troops rallied. yes indeed mr dictator just at the right time.

Your words Sir:--------
2. then try and ban anybody who thinks completely differently to them
pretending that its for the good of the people
3. and then when they think the majority is on their side ...just simply try and externimate the rest

My words
Where the heck is your head at?? up your butt??the poll was not about 'banning' ..there was no 'pretending', it wasn't about being different at all; it was an accurate black and white poll based on the sentiment and feelings of the participants relating to one topic- QUANTITY of your threading. You are in your quest attempting to magnify your pain and anger and accuse others of what indeed you are doing, to turn this single topic into something different than its original intention.

RE: what do you think about people on connectingsingles that start threads about other members ?

yes these are his words in the poll thread, verbatum, quoted without ommisssion

Your words Sir.---------
typical somebody thats nothing to say for herself that wants to cut everybody else down to Their limit
thank god people like that don't have more power because this is how dictators come to power... and oppresss people -end

My response:
Polling and opining is a 'democratic' process sir. power attained by polling/considering the constituents. Voting has no part in a dictatorship; though the results 'dictate' an obvious feeling of the constituents. You also demean her and cast aside her offerings and her post as "having nothing to say for herself" very mean, very oppressive

RE: Hello Everyone i am new to the site

RE: HELLO YOU KNOW ME... JUST PUTTING IN MY NEW NAME

Hey eric!



new name and ...picture



still getting your rocks off too I see ... oh maybe thats 'on'

RE: WHO LIKE TO DO BOXING ON BED.......

why didnt I think of that

RE: Santa of the day is now in power!

no we'll see what I can do

RE: Santa of the day is now in power!

oh geee, maybe marys bum?

RE: Santa of the day is now in power!

whats that all over your knees kissmehardernexttime?

RE: Santa of the day is now in power!

cool shades bud!


where can i get me a pair, can't ask santa

One fabulous thing about CS

oops that was meant for martyg

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

I voted number 4 as did only 2 others.

Opinions are like arseholes, every1 has one.

though the poles may say otherwise, it seems choice number 4 is the clear winner even though only 3 votes show that in fact.

One fabulous thing about CS

:shovel icon:

One fabulous thing about CS

thanks brother ... though i should not have mentioned a name unless of course I know that person is a

One fabulous thing about CS

well I know of two others I wont mention, trust me they dont even come close to CS, free or otherwise.

One fabulous thing about CS

another one!

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

The wise words of a philosopher... "in anger no man speaks of that but himself".

since you will not accept wisdom, staying on topic, rationality or olive branches I say to you..




have a merry christmas bud

One fabulous thing about CS

There is one thing about CS I have not found anywhere else on the web and it is deserving of kudos to CS.

On most sites when there is contraversy, inevitably someone runs to the mods and complains and in the end someone gets booted regardless of fact or ability to stay on topic.

CS however like a wise parent allows their children to work it out themsleves, for that CS deserves a ...one doesn't become a responsible adult of any community by forcing mommy (mods) to choose between her children, she just lets them work it out themselves.


CS

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

Gilly said -"because i'm too busy tending to my own threads "



your very own words dude..'quantity'



there are none so blind as those who will not see.

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

maybe they left because your quantity of threads left no room on the front page for their threads?

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

someone who understands number crunching.

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

Look, this thread was, is about 'Quantity'

it is not about Gilly's usefulness, topic choices, gossip, harrassment or whatever CS rules one might care to oblige.

I do however take responsibility for some people's posts being harrassment, gossip, etc. because I used HIS name and should not have.

I humbly and respectfully request that folks stay on 'topic' at the very least... quantity, nothing more/less.

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

I hear your anger Gilly and I apologize for my insensitive thoughtless post using your name.


you may slag ME; I understand but slagging my 'friends' whoever you feel they are is uncalled for, they have done nothing.

the thread is also not about your topic choices or their validity and usefullness here, it is about the 'quantity'


no one has been 'exposed' as all can see that quantity for themselves.


Once again I apologize for using your name, I jumped the gun and take responsibility for that and again it is not about quality, usefullness or anything else but 'quantity'!

RE: And who here understands prince?

As I have so recently learned... a little more sensitivity..

Should 'Gilly' be limited to 217 threads per day?

then let it die people....


why keep posting, and yes submitting votes if you're so offended?