Grammar and English
I have noticed alot of people on this site especialy women no offence. Over emphasise on spelling and grammar, excuse me if am wrong but we are on a dating site not Havard law school; doubt most of us would get that far. I would rather just concentrateon posting threads and quit lecturing, many thanks....

Comments (19)
And birds of a feather flock together...
Same principle applies
Make an effort of correct spelling and grammar, just like you would with clean clothes. It's appealing and gives a clue that you either have an education or know how to use a spell checker. Both definitely a "plus"!
Mind you, that is only my personal opinion. Sure, other people may think differently about this. And since you mentioned "especially women", it may mean that women pay more attention to such details...
Child: No, she ain't.
Visitor: How about your father?
Child: He ain't home neither.
Visitor: My goodness! Where's your grammar?
Child: She's in the kitchen, making cookies.
Spelling and Grammar are usually taught in Grammar school.
As what i said nobody's perfect...
Correction :
Incorrect : " And women are more detailed orientated "
Correct : ..... women are more detail oriented "
Have a good day
It would also have fricked me out if a kazakh person misspelled kazakh words since (s)he is a native speaker of Kazakh language but if somebody else misspelled kazakh words then I would have been really supportive for his/her attempt to try to speak my language.
I just wonder what the grammar schools teach and how they present the elementary knowledge in English speaking countries?
Do they teach how to build a single phrase - with a capital letter and punctuation (point, exclamation or question)mark, to distinguish and to divide the sentences apart- to know where to put Big letter and when to put the the different types of punctuation? Are the respective education systems so poor, because I have never met a single person with a serious Graduation (BA,MA, and even PhD)here with perfect spelling,who’s able to express himself in writing at his mother language!??
The % of the literate(in writing at their English as a mother language) and with common knowledge people is poor.Even in my country .Though THERE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE RULE. I AM NOT from English speaking country, so my poor English is excusable. I AM OBLIGED TO BE FLUENT& WITH PERFECT SPELLING SKILLS ONLY in my native language. And I am(maybe because it depends on the person).
How come so illiterate and without a common knowledge Nations’d establish and develop so powerful countries?
There is a poor excuse that it’s the Web who has created an artificial language that permit the wrong writing(spelling). Lack of spelling skills and knowledge of an artificial language are two quite different ..... and noticeable differences
I agree that full proficiency should only be expected in one's native language; that is the language you were schooled in and spent your formative years. I disagree on the point that you shouldn't strive for proficiency when learning an additional language if you expect to use it as a communication tool. The more well versed you are in the language you are using, the better the communication. I admit to having a little trouble reading your post but I certainly wouldn't abuse you for it!
I admire those who have the courage to blog on this site when English is their second language, however, there is a difference between lazyiness and simply not fully comprehending a language. I make typos and errors too, but some people just write any old thing they feel like without regard to how it looks to the reader.
When I learned a second language, I made a damn hard effort to write it correctly.
Also, honestly when people post things that are jarbled or not very well written, many people won't read the entire posting or will not give it much credibility.
You don't have to go to Harvard Law School to learn how to use a spell checker in Microsoft Word. Just paste what you wrote in a blank document and click spell check! It's really not that complicated.....
AS FOR THE QUESTION:
Artificial language is "esperanto" for example. Don't tell me that you haven't heard about Esperanto? A simple definition of an artificial language is any language whose lexicon and grammar were developed from an individual source for the sake of itself. Individual source refers to either one creator or a select body of creators. Unlike an authentic language, the brunt of it emerges with relative suddenness. A great deal of time might transpire over the course of its development, but when it is released to others the language must be communicatively functional - i.e. the system can be used to convey many ideas.