More Blogs... Read Next
About this Blog
by sdarlagg
created Feb 19
381 Views
Last Viewed: 2 mins ago
Last Commented: Feb 20
3 Likes
Last Liked: Feb 21
sdarlagg has 76 other Blogs
sdarlagg Blogs (76)
Feeling Creative?
Report Blogs that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the Blog Abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to Report Blog Abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Comments (8)
Our entire Federal Budget is borrowed !
Protect our border and our citizens health and safety Again.
Marxism is a social, economic and political philosophy that analyses the impact of the ruling class on the labourers, leading to uneven distribution of wealth and privileges in that society.
Definition of Fascism.
Fascism is a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
Marxism is a social, economic and political philosophy that analyses the impact of the ruling class on the labourers, leading to uneven distribution of wealth and privileges in that society.
Definition of Fascism.
Fascism is a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
Adolf Hitler on Nazism and socialism: “Each activity and each need of the individual will thereby be regulated by the party as the representative of the general good. There will be no license, no free space, in which the individual belongs to himself. This is Socialism—not such trifles as the private possession of the means of production. Of what importance is that if I range men firmly within a discipline they cannot escape? Let them then own land or factories as much as they please. The decisive factor is that the State, through the party, is supreme over them, regardless whether they are owners or workers. All that, you see, is unessential. Our Socialism goes far deeper . . . .
“he people about us are unaware of what is really happening to them. They gaze fascinated at one or two familiar superficialities, such as possessions and income and rank and other outworn conceptions. As long as these are kept intact, they are quite satisfied. But in the meantime they have entered a new relation; a powerful social force has caught them up. They themselves are changed. What are ownership and income to that? Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings.”
The Ominous Parallels
(Adolf Hitler to Hermann Rauschning, quoted by) Leonard Peikoff,
Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazis did not advocate public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the government oversee and run the nation’s economy. The issue of legal ownership, they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of control. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property—so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property.
If “ownership” means the right to determine the use and disposal of material goods, then Nazism endowed the state with every real prerogative of ownership. What the individual retained was merely a formal deed, a contentless deed, which conferred no rights on its holder. Under communism, there is collective ownership of property de jure. Under Nazism, there is the same collective ownership de facto.
The Ominous Parallels
Leonard Peikoff,
“To be a socialist,” says Goebbels, “is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole.”
By this definition, the Nazis practiced what they preached. They practiced it at home and then abroad. No one can claim that they did not sacrifice enough individuals.
The Ominous Parallels
Leonard Peikoff,
Both of them are Statist Brainbrothers!
Your system is far better. Focus ALL media attention on a few people who get off on it and blindly ignore everything and everybody else. That way when people suddenly are directly affected by moronic changes in the law they can't drum up any support because if it ain't about the man with the freak hair, or the man who kisses hair, if it is only life of little people, ain't nobody listening.
Be interesting, though, if anything ever made your obsessed media suddenly interested in the lives of all those millions of little people who actually make up countries. Would they be able to turn the tide they created? Would you LET them?