About this Blog
by Unknown
created Mar 2012
1,005 Views
Last Viewed: Apr 17
Last Commented: Mar 2012
Blogs by this User
Feeling Creative?
Report Blogs that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the Blog Abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to Report Blog Abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Comments (31)
He doesn't promise a total cure,but your chances with him are better then with traditional medicine which has not changed since the seventies.
to increase it's effectiveness. I believe it has potential.
The concept of regulation of tumor suppression is one
that has been sought after before. Most of the research
in this area is on the oncogenes themselves, rather than
the molecular messengers. Burzynski's peptides MAY be those
intercellular messenges that intiate turning on the tumor suppressor genes, or may be the effectors of those tumor
suppresor genes. More research is needed.
Otherwise he would not have patented the peptides.
He has a right to make money.
In my opinion the FDA does not have a right to prevent him
from curing cancers.
I have found my friends in Canada and the UK get free medical just hurry up and wait better than i want to make a million while you die maybe I am in the wrong country. that's what my guy in Scotland ask and he dost know yet.Sorry Carl
that have been cured by him ? People that the doctors
documented with an incurable disease, who are living years later ?
That's WHY he was allowed to use his experimental treatment by the FDA.
he was allowed to treat less hopeless situations,
or even allowed to treat earlier after the initial
discovery of the cancers.
I have seen the horror.
I have no problems with someone finding the cure, what the problem is people who claim they can cure and dont deliver, if you know someone personal who has been cured by this man, I'll give it a second look. The Dr could have paid these people, just like Hinn dose (I have no evidence of any of this, so it is just my opinion)..
they should be the FIRST line of defense against cancer.
Chemotherapy should be the last line of defense, not the
other way around.
He has no desire to even briefly look over Dr Burzynski's case files.
Done!
who have given up hope for their patients.
They are too severe to cure with chemotherapy.
He doesn't claim he can cure someone.
Yet, sometimes he DOES deliver a cure,
where no one else can.
I cant blame people who have this terrible disease to look at anything to try and cure them, I would do the same. The thing is if you smoke (like me) or have a family history of it, then the obvious thing to do is get life insurrance in advance, there not much you can do for yourself, but at least look at what your gonna leave behind. The proberbility of me getting cancer is high. Is it a disease, curse, sickness or plauge?
I'm also saying if this cure was out there it would have been made already, good luck to the doc if he's telling the turth, sometimes if you believe hard enough in something miricles happen....
Personal I would pick up the bible and get to know the creator.