Man Walked with Dinosaurs
JULY 30, 2014 POSTED BY THEA
Grounbreaking Research: Scientist Terminated for Proving Dinosaurs and Humans Walked the Earth Together
Traditional history suggests that dinosaurs and humans never crossed paths because their existence on earth was separated by tens of millions of years.
But a new discovery by scientist Mark Armitage of the California State University may well turn the history of human civilization upside down.
Armitage was recently on a dig in Montana when he came across the largest triceratops horn ever unearthed. Upon further examination of the unique specimen with a high-powered microscope Armitage discovered something that no scientist had ever seen on a dinosaur sample before – soft tissue.
When he published his findings his colleagues were stunned, because the existence of soft tissue, which should degrade and disappear over millions of years, suggests that dinosaurs didn’t go extinct 60 million years ago, but rather, were alive and well in North America just several thousand years ago.
One would think that such a notable discovery would lead to more research into the possibility that humans and dinosaurs may have co-existed at one point in time. But that’s far from what happened.
Armitrage’s funding was pulled, his research was silenced and his job at CSU was terminated.
Apparently, the researcher’s findings were so significant that the board of trustees at the university feared it would too closely mesh science with religion.
**
Yet, up until now, no hard scientific research confirmed that such large animals with reptile-like skin existed.
Armitrage’s discovery of soft tissue adds physical evidence to biblical record. And apparently, that threatened an upheaval in the scientific community, subsequently leading to Armitrage’s termination.
A press release from the Pacific Justice Institute argues that Armitrage was terminated on the basis of religion for sharing a controversial theory and providing evidence for such:
“Terminating an employee because of their religious views is completely inappropriate and illegal,” commented Brad Dacus, President of PJI. “But doing so in an attempt to silence scientific speech at a public university is even more alarming. This should be a wakeup call and warning to the entire world of academia,” he continued.
**
According to court documents, shortly after the original soft tissue discovery, a university official challenged the motives of Armitage, by shouting at him, “We are not going to tolerate your religion in this department!”
Armitage, a published scientist of over 30 years, was subsequently let go after CSUN abruptly claimed his appointment at the university of 38 months had been temporary, and claimed a lack of funding for his position. This was news to him, and contradicted prior statements and documents from the university.
Michael Peffer, staff attorney with PJI’s southern California office said, “It has become apparent that ‘diversity’ and ‘intellectual curiosity,’ so often touted as hallmarks of a university education, do not apply to those with a religious point of view. This suit was filed, in part, to vindicate those ideals.”
**
"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith."
I Timothy 6:20-21
***
See also: Evidence Dinosaurs Lived With Man (and yes, went on Noah's Ark) By Bob Dutko
Endtimeinfo TFI [Video Posted]
Comments (11)
Sorry, no disrespect meant, just a little joke an my blogs...
In seriousness though I agree with Theresa She is right!
Have a lovely day
Every university would LOVE to add a Nobel laureate to it's faculty. If Armitage is correct, the evidence will continue to build. If not, it won't.
This is the simple explanation for both how and why science works so well.
Sir Isaac Newton, as I understand it was thought to be a bit dodgy in later life, perhaps due to dementia.
Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics, although he made a massive contribution was thought to maybe be a little biased about assessing the wrinkles in his peas in order to fit his theory.
From the OP, there is not enough information to know who might have been less than objective and the alleged shouted rejection of religion could have been about objectivity, rather than suppression of beliefs, couldn't it?
Not that I'm denying the possibility of academic hierarchy, ethics, protocol, funding, or ego.