Science Blogs (316)

Hi everybody! Some evidences to prove the theory of evolution is wrong.
Thank you for reading.

Today, Darwin's theory of evolution is widely known and it was incorporated into the School. Full name is Charles Darwin Darwin, lived around the 19th century.
>> Fact of Evolution: The drawings of Haeckel's fake embryo, frequently lie centuries (part 1)
>> Fact of Evolution: The drawings of Haeckel's fake embryo, frequently lie century (part 2)
1842, Charles Darwin penned the first sketches for the book came to be called "Origin of Species" (On the Origin of Species).
1859, Darwin published his book "The Origin of Species". The book explains in detail about 'natural selection', said that 'the population of the species evolve over generations' is through a process called 'natural selection.' Evolution launched in this book is also explained on the way, how was that for Evolution has been widely accepted.
According to Darwin's theory of evolution: humans evolved from ape ancient ancestry comments African apes. Charles Darwin was the first to assume that gibbon African origin of humans in his 'Origin of Species' 1859. This implies that humans do not have a special place in the universe nothing.
At the outset, it has always been the community of science and public opposition, it creates controversy and discussions on the basis of Philosophy, Sciences .. It is also objectionable from other theories and religion until today. Thus although it is debatable, no final conclusions about human origins, it was a puzzle unsolved, but in some countries the Orient, theory of evolution was put on preaching taught as an absolute truth in the Secondary Education program.
So let's skip all religious backgrounds, or other theories, let's use evidence to prove the fact view is truly Evolution true or false:
According to Darwin's theory of evolution, admits that all animals have evolved from low to high, according to this theory, humans evolved from apes neck. According to archaeological documents are discovered, they determine the age of ancient ape fossils that, the analysis showed that radiocarbon process ancient apes evolved into not more than 10 million people a year. Another one is, the ancient apes evolved into humans, and from humans that gradually formed its civilization today. In other words, the so only a single civilization of humans today, as humans evolved from an ape single neck to today then formed civilization. On earth has the oldest civilization is 5000 thousand years, according to some archaeological documents they say it is about 7000 years. Thus said, the process of human and ape evolution civilization form, although any way the existence of civilization that is not more than 10,000 years.
But there is evidence that ancient mosaic discovered today, is very contradictory with the above.
First Proof, In India it was discovered an iron bar to 99.72% rate is pure iron. Excerpted from conference reports for "IRON PILLAR DELHI" held in 2005.
"The chemical analysis Carried out in the earlier years have indicated it is made of pure mà wrought iron containing a high of 99.72 Proportion of phosphorous and sulfur little. Carried out by researchers Subsequent Investigations using electron probe the presence of Cu báo Examination (of 0.03%), Ni (12:05%) and Mn (12:07%). "

The level of human metallurgy current can not produce iron with such purity, so who produce it? Humans currently can not produce it, then go back in history, if Darwin's theory of evolution, monkeys should any of the many millions of years ago has been a remarkable level of metallurgical versus species people today. So this is a proof that man can not evolve from ape-neck yet.

How do u define & explain the change in weather (or) not, in ur region?

that is taking over the Northeast

Humans are not newcomers when it comes to messing around with nature. While we haven't created Frankenstein's monster yet, what we do transforms the natural world.

One recent example is the creation of the coywolf — a hybrid of the coyote and the wolf that is also known as the Eastern coyote. According to a new article from The Economist, their population seems to have reached more than a million.

These animals have a completely new genetic makeup: Their genes are about one-quarter wolf DNA and two-thirds coyote DNA; the rest is from domesticated dogs. A 2013 study suggests this dog DNA is mostly from a few specific breeds, including German Shepherds and Doberman Pincers.

Human activity likely played a role in the species' creation. As humans cut down wolves' forest homes and hunted down their populations, the lack of available partners for wolves led them to search elsewhere for mates, leading them to coyotes and dogs.

Scientists think this intermixing began with wild wolves in southern Ontario about a century or two ago.

The coywolves' success is astounding scientists. According to The Economist:

The animal’s range has encompassed America’s entire north-east, urban areas included, for at least a decade, and is continuing to expand in the south-east following coywolves’ arrival there half a century ago. This is astonishing. Purebred coyotes never managed to establish themselves east of the prairies. Wolves were killed off in eastern forests long ago. But by combining their DNA, the two have given rise to an animal that is able to spread into a vast and otherwise uninhabitable territory.

Here's the coyote, which traditionally maxes out at 75 pounds and has pointier features, and readily populates cities:



And this is what a wolf looks like. Wolves are usually bigger, weighing in at about 100 pounds, and prefer more wild habitats.



While the grey wolf and the coyote are each other's closest living relatives, the two animals separated evolutionarily 1 to 2 million years ago.

Usually hybrids — even between two closely related species — don't survive as well as their parent species, but the coywolves seem to be an exception. They've only really emerged in force during the last few decades, but they seem to have a few advantages over their parent species.

According to The New York Times' Moises Velazquez-Manoff: "[The coywolf] can be as much as 40 percent larger than the Western coyote, with powerful wolf-like jaws; it has also inherited the wolf's more social nature, which allows for pack hunting."

According to The Economist: "With larger jaws, more muscle and faster legs, individual coywolves can take down small deer. A pack of them can even kill a moose."

These animals are even better fitted to our changing world than we thought, and their proliferation has been more "rapid, pervasive, and transformational than once thought," according to The Economist. The genetic combination of the two animals seems especially well suited to the northern habitat. The wolf genes allow the coyote to take down bigger prey, while the coyote genes let them adapt to cities and other populated areas.

The wolves even follow railroads into cities, making themselves scarce during the day — adopting a nocturnal schedule. They even look both ways before crossing the highway.


Randy Droniuk caught this coywolf lounging in Oakville, Ontario, Canada.

Another reason the animals are so successful could be their wider diet, according to The Economist:

... experiences you have throughout your live, leave chemical markers on your DNA, essentially ingraining superficial experiences into your DNA.

I wonder if this explains "past life" memories that some people have?

Some thinkers even believe that, for better or worse, constant to virtual exposure reality could completely transform human consciousness. Critics fear that large numbers of people might come to prefer virtual worlds to the real one. Like the philosopher Plato, they would feel that the everyday world is an imperfect reflection of an ideal, but, in opposition to the prisoners in Plato's imaginary cave, they would see the ideal world as the one shown on the screen and the imperfect world as the one outside. Why let others see a flawed real body when online interactions can be delivered through a beautiful, sexy avatar? Why bother with a boring real life when, in an online world, a person can fly through the air, have adventures in distant or imaginary lands, and build a house or even a city in any form he or she wants?

The idea that people might choose to ignore the actual world and withdraw into virtual reality began to concern writers and thinkers long before VR technology actually developed. In Summa Technologiae , a book of essays about the future published in 1964, Polish science-fiction writer Stanislaw Lem described an imaginary machine that he called a Phantomat. According to an essay by author John Gray, Lem pictured the dangers of permanent immersion in the Phantomat's virtual reality this way:

The more realistic the virtual world the machine creates, the more imprisoned we are in our imaginations. As our embodied selves, we interact with a world we know only in part, and which operates independently of our desire. In contrast, the virtual worlds we encounter in the Phantomat are human constructions. Fabricated from our dreams, they are worlds in which nothing can be hurt or destroyed because nothing really exists. In short, they are worlds in which nothing really matters.
Richard DeGrandpre, like Lem, believes that once people become used to virtual worlds, the real world will no longer satisfy them, and they will withdraw from it. This will happen, he thinks, not only because virtual reality will be so appealing, but because social, environmental, and other problems will have made the real world just the opposite. "The ultimate reason we're apt to be taking flight from material reality," he writes, "is to escape the expanding unpleasantness of our inner and outer lives—a melange of boredom, restlessness, . . . anxiety, and depression."

Read more:
Some other people have also reported readjustment problems after using virtual reality or doing other intensive work with computers. After researching on the Internet for some time, for example, reporter Chip Brown wrote that he

woke one night from a peculiar dream, disturbed . . . by . . . the way the scenes had changed; they had not unfolded in a horizontal flow, the movie-like montage of a typical dream presentation, but had scrolled past, rolling up vertically from bottom to top. And my focus had shifted, too, as if the inner observer were no longer located behind my eyes, but had been projected 24 inches forward, out of my body, a displacement roughly equal to the distance between my desk chair and the computer monitor. The conclusion was inescapable. I had become a mouse. Not even a mouse. A mouse indicator. A curso


Read more:

I fear both the USSR and the US made a grievous ill considered decision in 1975 when those external govt.s decided in encourage the civil war in Lebanon for their own political agendas. Although some back then forecast the introduction of chaos to a stable system the outside countries saw no downside in that. Perhaps because their leaders then lacked the IQ to understand the math they were being warned of.

Chaos Theory predicts if there is an element of chaos, then it will spread. The growth rate can be mathematically predicted by fractal analysis.

In the 40 years since the beginning of the Lebanese Civil War we have seen many groups with elements of behavioral similarity come and go or change name. Intitially when it was just Lebanon the number was small as fractal growth would predict. There is a paradigm called the percolation threshold. As a structure changes from many disconnected parts into one, we say that percolation has occurred. There is a threshold value at which disconnected elements begin to merge together. Civilization may not be a natural structure and Chaos may much prefer anarchy.

In the 40 years one country after another has been destabilized by one outside government or another with though only to short term needs of the disrupter. Congo, Syria, Irag, Afghanistan, etc.

This has created many areas of land mass where nothing rules and the stage is set for what is called the Forest Fire Model of fractal growth. The more densely the cities are packed the more fuel to burn.

Comparing the emergence and spread of violent radical groups over 40 years in the areas destabilized very scarily gives almost identical results to running a fractal generation program in Forest Fire Mode.

The mathematical modeling of the growth of new terrorist members can be predicted using the fundamental concepts of the Brownian Motion (a predictive study for the movement of solid molecules in a liquid environment). The fractals will grow dendrites and new fractals will coerce at the end of the dendrites. Perhaps the Dendrites are analogous to social media and other communication methods? In any case once the process begins in a percolated area, very soon the screen turns black.

When a given percolated area has turned black, the production of fractals does not necessarily stop. We come to a mathematical Chaos Theory called Strange Attractor and some new things called insect fractals and animal fractals. Where they differ from normal fractals is they do not require percolated areas to appear and grow. They may grow in areas where nothing else is found, for our purposes villages without education or jobs.

Like all fractals these multiply too until the area around them is solid. They will be very similar in form to triangle and other types of fractals growing around them and dendrites may soon stretch between them.

Why I say we all messed up is when I run some of the models in simulations of the mideast, middle to North Africa, and Southern Europe, a few hours after begining, everything turns black.

You can bomb a square to try to keep it white, but the instant you stop, those little black dots begin to appear and grow. Anarchists and Chaos Theory love each other.

The only solutions for a change of outcome I see is to reinstall governments and robust infrastructure in the areas previously intentionally destabilized. Yes, who bells the cat?

Still the concept is to block the black fractals by already having nice stable, blue or green or yellow fractals of our own there already. Yes, the black will try to circle and smother, but our own fractals will be doing the same. The secret is to recognize the problem and plant blue and yellow beacons of hope where there today is only white space.

In studying a book on volcanoes in a university library, I found the book also contained information on what caused the ice age. A team of scientists around the world studied deep core samples taken from the earth, tree ring studies around the world, ocean current studies, and input from volcano experts and agreed on the sequence of events that caused the ice age.

Each volcano emits a unique chemical composition in its lava, and one volcano expert couldn’t understand why he had collected identical lava samples from a wide ranging area where no volcano peak or caldera was apparent. After viewing satellite photos of the area he realized the samples were from such a huge caldera that was so wide and the slope so gradual it wasn’t discernable from the ground. Other data they studied included some ancient writings that said the earth had been 30 days in cold darkness without sunlight and people were starving to death.

The scientists concluded the sequence of events causing the ice age were:
There was a period of global warming.
The ice caps melted.
Chunks of ice floated into the warm gulf stream currents.
This messed up the well balanced current flow in all the worlds oceans.
This caused the tectonic plates to shift slightly.
This resulted in increased earthquakes and volcanoes.
A large enough volcano erupted that its ash blocked the sun and cooled the earth and caused the ice age.

Does this sequence of events sound familiar??? Could Yellowstone erupt and cause the next ice age???

After searching 100,000 galaxies for signs of highly advanced extraterrestrial life, a team of scientists using observations from NASA's WISE orbiting observatory has found no evidence of advanced civilizations in them. "The idea behind our research is that, if an entire galaxy had been colonized by an advanced spacefaring civilization, the energy produced by that civilization's technologies would be detectable in mid-infrared wavelengths—exactly the radiation that the WISE satellite was designed to detect for other astronomical purposes," said Jason T. Wright, an assistant professor of astronomy and astrophysics at the Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds at Penn State University, who conceived of and initiated the research.

Roger Griffith, a postbaccalaureate researcher at Penn State and the lead author of the paper, scoured almost the entire catalog of the WISE satellite's detections—nearly 100 million entries—for objects consistent with galaxies emitting too much mid-infrared radiation. He then individually examined and categorized around 100,000 of the most promising galaxy images. Wright reports, "We found about 50 galaxies that have unusually high levels of mid-infrared radiation. Our follow-up studies of those galaxies may reveal if the origin of their radiation results from natural astronomical processes, or if it could indicate the presence of a highly advanced civilization."

In any case, Wright said, the team's non-detection of any obvious alien-filled galaxies is an interesting and new scientific result. "Our results mean that, out of the 100,000 galaxies that WISE could see in sufficient detail, none of them is widely populated by an alien civilization using most of the starlight in its galaxy for its own purposes. That's interesting because these galaxies are billions of years old, which should have been plenty of time for them to have been filled with alien civilizations, if they exist. Either they don't exist, or they don't yet use enough energy for us to recognize them," Wright said.