Science Blogs (316)

In very primitive life forms, there are methods of exchange of genetic materials, between sexes, but it hardly resembles s*xual reproduction. But all higher forms, including even many plants, with exceptions, from a genetic viewpoint, resemble the egg and sperm deal seem in humans. So the advantages of this scheme go very far back and are everywhere. Except in many liberals, and other primitive human like organisms.

Many will know of how, among some men, fishing stories occasionally turn up tales of specimens several times larger than even remotely biologically possible. Does one see such for things among women?

Best evidence, from a number of lines of inquiry, confirm that the universe is expanding. Individual galaxies remain relatively tight, helped by internal gravity. But the distance between them is increasing, and the more distant these are from each other, the faster they go. Like raisins in rising bread dough. Dark energy ( ? matter) is doing the pushing, we're told, but noone knows at all what this is. Freaking out here over all this. Aa-V.

What would our DNA look like if we didn’t have a 24-hour day?

Understanding Anti-matter

Time travel. Is it real or imaginary?
National Geographic offers their perspective on the subject.

How to time travel.


Time Travel, The Truth.

After watching the movie Eyes Wide Shut, I was left wondering what this movie was all about. Stanley Kubrick, the producer, was a genius and a very meticulous man when it came to making movies. After being advised of the symbolism this movie possessed, I decided to do my own digging on Youtube about some of its meanings. I am not going to get into what I did or didn't hear about the movie, as it is all speculation...since Kubrick died 5 days after editing the movie is no longer here to confirm or deny these speculations.

But, what I found evenly as fascinating, was right below the videos regarding the messages about the said movie above, were videos exposing Disney's messages in their works. Some of the images shown in cartoons were quite frankly, disgusting....especially for a target audience of young children. In one frame, they showed a woman with her breast exposed. Reportedly, their mission was to charge young children sexually, and encourage them to disobey their parents in the future.

Subliminal message, they explained, works on a subconscious level. On the conscious level, our brains can only process so much data and information. So, watching these cartoons, the conscious mind normally does not pick up on these images/messages. However, they inform that the subconscious can process millions more times the amount of data the conscious mind can. In essence, the messaging is stored in our subconscious....thus, they explain the mind-control project we are all be subjected to.

To confirm this statement about the subconscious processing immense more data than the conscious mind, I once heard from a hypnotist, he said, he could hypnotize somebody well into their adult years and have them recall the eye color of everyone of their friends at their third birthday party.

Our Largest Ocean is presenting symptoms of terminal radiation poisoning....

While doing my work, the television was still on the Channel it was on earlier in the day, National Geographic. I don't usually watch that channel and am not very familiar with their programs. But last night, I found they had a very interesting show on having to do with King Tut and the contents of his tomb. There were a lot of things they mentioned on that show that went against common belief about the King himself. However, what I found even more interesting, they were showing items never seen before. Of these things never shown before, there were two items that just stuck out to me...and to the creators of the show also.

They each had their own sarcophagus. There were two "babies" buried with Tut.

Where do I go from here....hmm. If I only knew how to upload images of these so-called babies, I am sure one could guess where I a going.

I believe I shared this story on here once before, but here is just a quick rendition of it. About 20-ish years ago, living in the countryside of America, with my nearest neighbor about a 1/4 mile away, something dug up a single plant I had. The previous day I planted it, and surround it with vegetation...the darn thing was only 2" tall. After I was done planting it, I could not even see it myself. But, anyway, I knew the exact area it was. The next day I go out to that exact area to check on it...to only find a freshly dug hole. A hole probably 10" wide by about 8" deep...nothing huge. The dirt from the hole was sitting off to one side and in that fresh dirt was a footprint the exact shape of a human's footprint....the heal, the arch, the toes, and the wedge shape. Dumbfounded by this, I thought to myself, if this was a human that did this, most likely there should be fingertip marks on the walls of the hole. I checked that, and sure enough, there were small rounded tip marks that had scraped and running down vertically the walls of the hole.

I asked my gf if I could borrow the birth certificate of her son's....because it had his infant footprint on it. I took it out there and compared it, not only did it look identical but it was also the same size. I figured whatever dug out that hole was the size of a newborn.

Okay, now back to the show. Both of the "babies" they claim, were still born and were Tut's unborn children. I am not an expert on what stillborn babies look like. But, I have seen a couple of UFO shows in the past few years where people who claimed to have seen aliens described what they seen to artists and sketches have been drawn of those people's accounts. In my opinion, the "baby" on the right (since the only thing that really exists are photos of Tut's "unborn babies," you can see which one I am referring to) looks pretty much identical to these artist's alien drawings. The only thing that does not match, is the height of them.

The thing that baffles me...even the show creators found these never shown beings significant...why were they never shown before? In addition, why were they not better preserved? Anyway.....

Happy Monday folks.

I believe it is just another conspiracy to keep people in jobs. Everything is exaggerated for the sake of sensation and organizations like Green Peace cash in on it by thriving on the people’s fears.

We only have data for less than 200 years and now some people want to create panic by applying a few years worth of data to the entire history of Earth. It’s like as if you can paint the whole picture by picking up one tiny piece of a giant jigsaw puzzle.

Yes, it is a fact that the planet’s mean temperature is rising by about one tenth of a degree Centigrade per century but that is to be expected. After all, we are coming out of an ice age. It is also true that places with a higher population density had a steeper increase in temperature than the norm but other areas have gone colder. We don’t even know if the rate of warming is increasing or decreasing.

Now they concentrate on those places that are getting warmer while ignoring the places going colder and bombard us with selective statistics. By using a different set of statistics it will be just as easy to proof the Earth is in fact cooling down. For all we know, we may be having cycles, spanning several centuries, of rising and dropping temperatures.

Okay, so the mean temperature of Earth is rising very slowly but we don’t know how much of that is caused by man. Astronomers say that every planet in our solar system is warming up to the same degree. So, are we responsible for that too; or do we blame the Martians and the Saturnians for that? There is just is not enough data to prove anything.

Our few factories and car exhausts are farting against thunder when compared to nature’s own pollution. A single volcano eruption can cause more heat, pollution and environmental damage in one week than all of mankind can do in years. Yet, Mother Earth coped with it every time.

Yes, I agree, we should be responsible and we should prevent pollution wherever we can but there is no reason to inflate figures or to brainwash us with selected data to proof something that is not certain at all.


Have a great day.