International Law Enforcement Operates in U.S. (464)
crucialone: Page 4....5th post down. Its there for all to see.
9oo mm Hg Hurricane
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: 9oo mm Hg Hurricane
You're even more dense than I thought you are!
Verboret!
You're even more dense than I thought you are!
Verboret!
Page 4....5th Post down.....
------ This thread is Archived ------
9oo mm Hg Hurricane
------ This thread is Archived ------
ttom500: That is such double talk Crucialone that even the Irish blarney stone would not let you kiss it.......
But returning to the question you ask. About what GOOD the US had done in the world. I gave you 3 paragraphs of it in regards to just Iraq and Afghanistan. Straight historical stuff all.
I have talked with alot of old WWII vets.....one thing 10 or so said to me. "Unless you were there, you don't know." Think about that in light of Iraq, Afghanistan and Dubai for moment.
Crucialone, you sit here and say I site facts. Only the truth come from Crucialone....and then use wiki as a source. Anyone in the world can post into wiki, Crucialone.
The best source in the world is gov't study. But even that is not 100% accurate or up date. But I guarrantee you, Crucialone....you werenot in Iraq, Afghanistan or Dubai. So returning to my WWII vets quote.....you don't know.
You want to nail the US to war crimes in Iraq and these supposed deaths?. I will tell you exactly how to. Because this is exactly how we nailed Milosovic in Kosovo. Satellite imagery of mass burial sites. Just dig up some time date Iraqi satellite imagery from imagery sources. Find your sites. Show it to Attroeny General Holder or to one of your INTERPOL guys. Then go to the site in Iraq.
Have some Iraqi IDF and US Military there when you dig it up. Find the bodies. Prove your point. The US military will just love to help you on this mission. They will bend end over backwards aiding you to prove that the US Military has killed these 60,000 Iraqi.
My suggestion.....when the big burley Staff Sargeant says....."Sir
would you mind to follow me". Do ask him were? If he says "I have something in the ground that I want to show you". If it has three prongs sticking up....don't step on it. It will so end a good day.
Then again....you might find Sadam's WMDs. And would that not be a bummer.
But until then. I will stay with Iraqi gov't study on the Iraq war deaths. While you go looking for the 60,000 Iraqi dead.
But returning to the question you ask. About what GOOD the US had done in the world. I gave you 3 paragraphs of it in regards to just Iraq and Afghanistan. Straight historical stuff all.
I have talked with alot of old WWII vets.....one thing 10 or so said to me. "Unless you were there, you don't know." Think about that in light of Iraq, Afghanistan and Dubai for moment.
Crucialone, you sit here and say I site facts. Only the truth come from Crucialone....and then use wiki as a source. Anyone in the world can post into wiki, Crucialone.
The best source in the world is gov't study. But even that is not 100% accurate or up date. But I guarrantee you, Crucialone....you werenot in Iraq, Afghanistan or Dubai. So returning to my WWII vets quote.....you don't know.
You want to nail the US to war crimes in Iraq and these supposed deaths?. I will tell you exactly how to. Because this is exactly how we nailed Milosovic in Kosovo. Satellite imagery of mass burial sites. Just dig up some time date Iraqi satellite imagery from imagery sources. Find your sites. Show it to Attroeny General Holder or to one of your INTERPOL guys. Then go to the site in Iraq.
Have some Iraqi IDF and US Military there when you dig it up. Find the bodies. Prove your point. The US military will just love to help you on this mission. They will bend end over backwards aiding you to prove that the US Military has killed these 60,000 Iraqi.
My suggestion.....when the big burley Staff Sargeant says....."Sir
would you mind to follow me". Do ask him were? If he says "I have something in the ground that I want to show you". If it has three prongs sticking up....don't step on it. It will so end a good day.
Then again....you might find Sadam's WMDs. And would that not be a bummer.
But until then. I will stay with Iraqi gov't study on the Iraq war deaths. While you go looking for the 60,000 Iraqi dead.
I see when i destroy you in a debate you change the subjet completly again. What have WWII Vets got to do with the question "What has to the US done for the world recently"
And lets talk about Kosovo...why did you not send troops in there if you are so against tyrants and militiry dictators. And you can double you figure of 60,000...You answered none of my questions in reply to you on puppet governments, rebuilding a country you destroyed, guantanamo bay, torture, why a US life is worth more than one in the middle east, Opium production and trafficing increasing under US rule, Oil Pipeline and OPEC. But as usual when you are beaten you ignore the hard questions and chage the subject....Game over Ttom...I win again...as usual.
Really is too easy at times....Some competition please....
Time for bed me thinks...Laters Losers.
------ This thread is Archived ------
crucialone: No its not cause I'm white you fool!!!!
Or are you just another YouKnowWhat?------ This thread is Archived ------
Impact: I now know what the problem is,,, He's not really Irish, he's descended from one of those transplanted English people that Cromwell sent over,, so he can't really talk about freedom and liberty and rights... so there ya have it,,
Nothing to do with the thread but I am curious, this is not the first time you have posted this drivel. Can I ask how many generations have to be born in a Country before they can claim to be that nationality in your opinion?
------ This thread is Archived ------
patmac: Impressive, reasoned and intelligent reply NOT. Barometer climbing you are even repeating you insults.....TUT TUT....
Well insults are needed to get through to you. You obvioulsy dont read the posts before making stupid comments.
------ This thread is Archived ------
I was about to shut down here.
But Pres. A. of Iran just kicked over a bucket.
All I can say....I think that the present Iranian leadership really wants a fight with the US and/or the west.
Night all.
But Pres. A. of Iran just kicked over a bucket.
All I can say....I think that the present Iranian leadership really wants a fight with the US and/or the west.
Night all.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ttom500: That is such double talk Crucialone that even the Irish blarney stone would not let you kiss it.......
But returning to the question you ask. About what GOOD the US had done in the world. I gave you 3 paragraphs of it in regards to just Iraq and Afghanistan. Straight historical stuff all.
I have talked with alot of old WWII vets.....one thing 10 or so said to me. "Unless you were there, you don't know." Think about that in light of Iraq, Afghanistan and Dubai for moment.
Crucialone, you sit here and say I site facts. Only the truth come from Crucialone....and then use wiki as a source. Anyone in the world can post into wiki, Crucialone.
The best source in the world is gov't study. But even that is not 100% accurate or up date. But I guarrantee you, Crucialone....you werenot in Iraq, Afghanistan or Dubai. So returning to my WWII vets quote.....you don't know.
You want to nail the US to war crimes in Iraq and these supposed deaths?. I will tell you exactly how to. Because this is exactly how we nailed Milosovic in Kosovo. Satellite imagery of mass burial sites. Just dig up some time date Iraqi satellite imagery from imagery sources. Find your sites. Show it to Attroeny General Holder or to one of your INTERPOL guys. Then go to the site in Iraq.
Have some Iraqi IDF and US Military there when you dig it up. Find the bodies. Prove your point. The US military will just love to help you on this mission. They will bend end over backwards aiding you to prove that the US Military has killed these 60,000 Iraqi.
My suggestion.....when the big burley Staff Sargeant says....."Sir
would you mind to follow me". Do ask him were? If he says "I have something in the ground that I want to show you". If it has three prongs sticking up....don't step on it. It will so end a good day.
Then again....you might find Sadam's WMDs. And would that not be a bummer.
But until then. I will stay with Iraqi gov't study on the Iraq war deaths. While you go looking for the 60,000 Iraqi dead.
But returning to the question you ask. About what GOOD the US had done in the world. I gave you 3 paragraphs of it in regards to just Iraq and Afghanistan. Straight historical stuff all.
I have talked with alot of old WWII vets.....one thing 10 or so said to me. "Unless you were there, you don't know." Think about that in light of Iraq, Afghanistan and Dubai for moment.
Crucialone, you sit here and say I site facts. Only the truth come from Crucialone....and then use wiki as a source. Anyone in the world can post into wiki, Crucialone.
The best source in the world is gov't study. But even that is not 100% accurate or up date. But I guarrantee you, Crucialone....you werenot in Iraq, Afghanistan or Dubai. So returning to my WWII vets quote.....you don't know.
You want to nail the US to war crimes in Iraq and these supposed deaths?. I will tell you exactly how to. Because this is exactly how we nailed Milosovic in Kosovo. Satellite imagery of mass burial sites. Just dig up some time date Iraqi satellite imagery from imagery sources. Find your sites. Show it to Attroeny General Holder or to one of your INTERPOL guys. Then go to the site in Iraq.
Have some Iraqi IDF and US Military there when you dig it up. Find the bodies. Prove your point. The US military will just love to help you on this mission. They will bend end over backwards aiding you to prove that the US Military has killed these 60,000 Iraqi.
My suggestion.....when the big burley Staff Sargeant says....."Sir
would you mind to follow me". Do ask him were? If he says "I have something in the ground that I want to show you". If it has three prongs sticking up....don't step on it. It will so end a good day.
Then again....you might find Sadam's WMDs. And would that not be a bummer.
But until then. I will stay with Iraqi gov't study on the Iraq war deaths. While you go looking for the 60,000 Iraqi dead.
So many people think they know how it works out in these places and they are more often or not so far from the truth because their feet have never even touched the ground in these countries. Thoroughly enjoyed reading that ttom, thank you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
redkayak: THIS WAS JUST BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION: Although it's against the rules I'm posting it anyway.....Perhaps we can all quit feeding his ego and ignore him.....Which will piss him off moer than any reply....
I for one will quit responding to any of his nonsense. TT, Conrad, how about following suit? And the rest of you?
I for one will quit responding to any of his nonsense. TT, Conrad, how about following suit? And the rest of you?
You said that yesterday too.
Yet here you are!!!!!!!!!!------ This thread is Archived ------
Hey LillyLady
Sometimes you post like a red white and blue American, full of patriotic zeal.
Other times you post like an Israeli 5th columnist, trying to impose Israel's objectives on the US people.
A very wise Jew once said that nobody can serve 2 masters,
if it comes to a showdown, he'll always favorize one and betray the other.
So, which country is your "master"?
If you're going to wave a flag, at least be consistant and clear as to which flag you're waving.
If the US chose to invade Israel and install a US puppet regime, as it has done in Iraq, Afghanistan, and a lot of other nations would you support that invasion as you claim to support all the others?
If not, then your allegiance is really to Israel and not to the US.
As for me, you won't catch me waving any nation's flag.
Sometimes you post like a red white and blue American, full of patriotic zeal.
Other times you post like an Israeli 5th columnist, trying to impose Israel's objectives on the US people.
A very wise Jew once said that nobody can serve 2 masters,
if it comes to a showdown, he'll always favorize one and betray the other.
So, which country is your "master"?
If you're going to wave a flag, at least be consistant and clear as to which flag you're waving.
If the US chose to invade Israel and install a US puppet regime, as it has done in Iraq, Afghanistan, and a lot of other nations would you support that invasion as you claim to support all the others?
If not, then your allegiance is really to Israel and not to the US.
As for me, you won't catch me waving any nation's flag.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ttom500: I was about to shut down here.
But Pres. A. of Iran just kicked over a bucket.
All I can say....I think that the present Iranian leadership really wants a fight with the US and/or the west.
Night all.
But Pres. A. of Iran just kicked over a bucket.
All I can say....I think that the present Iranian leadership really wants a fight with the US and/or the west.
Night all.
And the feeling is mutual by a lot in the Rep Party. They would love nothing more than a war with Iran.
------ This thread is Archived ------
crucialone: And the feeling is mutual by a lot in the Rep Party. They would love nothing more than a war with Iran.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ttom500: No, it is just that INTERPOL...just is a INTERNATIONAL Law Enforcement Agency coming into the Unite States. Could that not qualify this to be a international issue?
Since we have your apathy at this time. Which is actually refreshing.
Tell us what Ireland has done for the world recently.
Since we have your apathy at this time. Which is actually refreshing.
Tell us what Ireland has done for the world recently.
Hmmm....
NOT invading Iraq comes to mind!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Fallingman: Hmmm....
NOT invading Iraq comes to mind!
Voted yes on the Lisbon Treaty!NOT invading Iraq comes to mind!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Voted yes on the Lisbon Treaty!
Yes. And rightly so! Glad to see you Conrad even if you are a reactionary old grump! lol 
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oh and i guess that Saddam should have been left to continue his good humanitarian acts in Iraq right?? You speak as though we were the terroists and Hussein was the loving kind hearted fellow.
This may be cold and callous but maybe we should let you all deal with tyrannts when they get out of hand how is that?
This may be cold and callous but maybe we should let you all deal with tyrannts when they get out of hand how is that?
Fallingman: Hmmm....
NOT invading Iraq comes to mind!
NOT invading Iraq comes to mind!
------ This thread is Archived ------
HealthyLiving: Obama gives Interpol free hand in U.S.
Washington Examiner Editorial
December 30, 2009
No presidential statement or White House press briefing was held on it. In fact, all that can be found about it on the official White House Web site is the Dec. 17 announcement and one-paragraph text of President Obama's Executive Order 12425, with this innocuous headline: "Amending Executive Order 12425 Designating Interpol as a public international organization entitled to enjoy certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities."In fact, this new directive from Obama may be the most destructive blow ever struck against American constitutional civil liberties. No wonder the White House said as little as possible about it.
There are multiple reasons why this Obama decision is so deeply disturbing. First, the Obama order reverses a 1983 Reagan administration decision in order to grant Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, two key privileges. First, Obama has granted Interpol the ability to operate within the territorial limits of the United States without being subject to the same constitutional restraints that apply to all domestic law enforcement agencies such as the FBI. Second, Obama has exempted Interpol's domestic facilities -- including its office within the U.S. Department of Justice -- from search and seizure by U.S. authorities and from disclosure of archived documents in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by U.S. citizens. Think very carefully about what you just read: Obama has given an international law enforcement organization that is accountable to no other national authority the ability to operate as it pleases within our own borders, and he has freed it from the most basic measure of official transparency and accountability, the FOIA.
The Examiner has asked for but not yet received from the White House press office an explanation of why the president signed this executive order and who among his advisers was involved in the process leading to his doing so. Unless the White House can provide credible reasons to think otherwise, it seems clear that Executive Order 12425's consequences could be far-reaching and disastrous. To cite only the most obvious example, giving Interpol free rein to act within this country could subject U.S. military, diplomatic, and intelligence personnel to the prospect of being taken into custody and hauled before the International Criminal Court as "war criminals."
As National Review Online's Andy McCarthy put it, the White House must answer these questions: Why should we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files that will be beyond the scrutiny of Congress, American law enforcement, the media, and the American people?
Washington Examiner Editorial
December 30, 2009
No presidential statement or White House press briefing was held on it. In fact, all that can be found about it on the official White House Web site is the Dec. 17 announcement and one-paragraph text of President Obama's Executive Order 12425, with this innocuous headline: "Amending Executive Order 12425 Designating Interpol as a public international organization entitled to enjoy certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities."In fact, this new directive from Obama may be the most destructive blow ever struck against American constitutional civil liberties. No wonder the White House said as little as possible about it.
There are multiple reasons why this Obama decision is so deeply disturbing. First, the Obama order reverses a 1983 Reagan administration decision in order to grant Interpol, the International Criminal Police Organization, two key privileges. First, Obama has granted Interpol the ability to operate within the territorial limits of the United States without being subject to the same constitutional restraints that apply to all domestic law enforcement agencies such as the FBI. Second, Obama has exempted Interpol's domestic facilities -- including its office within the U.S. Department of Justice -- from search and seizure by U.S. authorities and from disclosure of archived documents in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by U.S. citizens. Think very carefully about what you just read: Obama has given an international law enforcement organization that is accountable to no other national authority the ability to operate as it pleases within our own borders, and he has freed it from the most basic measure of official transparency and accountability, the FOIA.
The Examiner has asked for but not yet received from the White House press office an explanation of why the president signed this executive order and who among his advisers was involved in the process leading to his doing so. Unless the White House can provide credible reasons to think otherwise, it seems clear that Executive Order 12425's consequences could be far-reaching and disastrous. To cite only the most obvious example, giving Interpol free rein to act within this country could subject U.S. military, diplomatic, and intelligence personnel to the prospect of being taken into custody and hauled before the International Criminal Court as "war criminals."
As National Review Online's Andy McCarthy put it, the White House must answer these questions: Why should we elevate an international police force above American law? Why would we immunize an international police force from the limitations that constrain the FBI and other American law-enforcement agencies? Why is it suddenly necessary to have, within the Justice Department, a repository for stashing government files that will be beyond the scrutiny of Congress, American law enforcement, the media, and the American people?
Tell me that you are just now recognizing that OBAMA is connected to interests other than those American? - which does not make him a bad person, but it does make him unfit to be our prez
------ This thread is Archived ------
The Question still is,should INTERPOL allowed to operate in the US without any Constitutional constraints?
As a matter of Fact,should they be allowed to operate like that in any Country?
As a matter of Fact,should they be allowed to operate like that in any Country?
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
What I Lack In Vocabulary
everything is changing
The world is as you see
Reality Check
1830's Music
Salami, Salami, Baloney
Heavy Bass In The PM
Nature
Icebergs Still Around
How far is too far?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
I don't care what right wing, selfish, ignorant people like you think of me.
Florida, like Texas, has more transplants than natives living there. And it has a lot of seasonal transplants as well, so it is much more cosmopolitan than what is called the deep south.
"Deepness", (when it comes to the "deep south") isn't determined by latitude but by the level of seclusion from outside influence.