The missing link ( Archived) (268)

If we include existence in the definition of something, then asserting that it exists is a tautology. If we say that existence is part of the definition of God, in other words an analytic judgment, then we are simply repeating ourselves in asserting that God exists. We are not making a synthetic judgment that would add new information about the real existence of God to the purely conceptual definition of God.

i know just helping to clarify

Evolution is a design with purpose There is an Intelligence embedded in the Nature, Random evolutionist problem is that they cannot accept the embedded intelligence in the Nature and cannot accept the whole system as super organism .Nature is perpetually evolving with the living and for the non living .All natural phenomena are governed by physical laws and not in a random manner . For example Climate keep changing then the life adapts to the new climate by sensing the changed climate . Mutations are trigged to effect the adaption. If you scientifically examine the history of evolution in coordination with the climatic changes from Pre-Cambrian era , this point is very evident . Natural selection so nifty is that it kills off unsuccessful designs because they don't succeed and conversely, allows good designs to survive because they do succeed. Guided by this process, nature keeps itself thriving and healthy. As new conditions develop, flora and fauna are adjusted, and visa versa, in an intricate dance, the result of which is truly marvelous to behold. Evolutionists mistake the wizardry of science for having something to do with spiritual matters. Anyone who truly investigates the mystery of the DNA molecule -- this incredible micro, digital, error-correcting, redundant, self duplicating, information storage and retrieval system, with its own inherent language convention, that has the potential to develop any organism from raw biological material -- understands that life is the result of Intelligent Design. In light of recent discoveries such as the DNA molecule, the absurdity of the evolution argument is readily apparent when its basic formula is compared with that of the creation model of origins. Intelligent Evolution states that matter + energy + information = incredibly complex life.Random Evolution states that matter + energy + random chance = incredibly complex life. The theory of random evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit intelligence than proving the randomness . I am sure if Darwin was aware of the DNA factor ,he would not have proposed the Theory of evolution and natural selection . Even then we have the natural selection happening in theory of evolution the “selection “ needs intelligence and Intelligence need exchange information with its immediate surrounding and processing that to suggest the modifications as you call mutation to be more adaptive to the environment . There are many examples in nature where different ,physically incommunicable organisms works in synergy .That is just not random , how do a mango tree knows the taste of sweetness where it has no taste sensing mechanism but produce sweet mangoes which will be taken away by the animals for propagation of the species . How on earth It can imagine the tastes and liking of an animal? Why is it still produces Mangoes which is sweet ?.Plants have no eyes but flowers are eye catching for the insects to promote pollination . Plants have no sense to understand a butterfly’s affinity to colors and sweet taste of its nectar Who decides these things ? Random evolutionist are trying to mix oil and water. Whether or not God created the universe, and whether or not he has the time to worry about helping some tiny arthropod get through the Cretaceous period, is all together a different subject.

contd

Human beings have somehow developed the ability to unravel the mysteries of the natural world: DNA, the evolution of species, the Big Bang, quantum physics .Who created the physical rules allowing for and governing the phenomenon of an explosion? What's the purpose of all this? Fundamental questions about the reasons for the universe and its characteristics, or the very purpose of existence, continue to elude us. But each new scientific breakthrough has brought better understanding of the universe and our place in it. Each new understanding has replaced mystery and untruth with tangible truths.