Communication ( Archived) (82)

Amity: bob, google image of penor..you wont be disappointed

viva007: better not to

rohaan: Cool. I don't dilly dally in threads that become too negative. When I joined CS it was a totally leisure activity, for fun and perhaps to meet, at least electronically, some nice genuine folks. If a person isn't nice, I'm so outa here. If they're not genuine, I'm so outa here. No time to waste. So, does that mean everything should be about tea and crumpets? Well, no. Of course not. But no need to waller in quicksand, either. I'm into fun stuff. Happy stuff. Sunny stuff. Call me naive--s'allright. Life is just too short to get too bummed. Agree?

Nuliiiiiii: hehe u got em hun

viva007: oh Boban...do not piss a pretty women like that man

davpk10: This is a tricky thing I think here.How often are we misunderstood in our posts? Seems to happen a lot and an arguement ensues. I do not beleive we intend for an arguement to start ,but we have all found ourselves in this I think.

I find it hard to think that we as a group want to argue (well maybe one or two)Now I am not talking about a good old heated debate..but a real arguement.

I think that some mid-eastern and eastern posters are misunderstood the most and I can understand this happening....But with the western cultures you would think it would be less.

Is it that cultures are just differant so we take posts differantly?....Do we not read the post the same way? ...Does the poster not express themselves well? (I feel this is my case alot) and does the reader of a post only take out of it as they wish to and not really try to think what it is the poster is saying and then post before really understanding the other poster?

Now the big questions.

As a group what can we do to lessen this from happening?

Do we as a group want to?

I am genuinely interested it all that wish to express how they feel.