Landing on Moon: was that true?????? (947)
Amity: Who are you to tell people what they can debate about
Well said Amity !
------ This thread is Archived ------
Get a powerful telescope, and if you see the lunar rover and the lower stage of the lunar landers, then yes it's true lol
------ This thread is Archived ------
PrinceForYou: Get a powerful telescope, and if you see the lunar rover and the lower stage of the lunar landers, then yes it's true lol
Nasa have that technology but of course will not show us
any proof.
Why ??
They can't !!!
------ This thread is Archived ------
tallman51: Nasa have that technology but of course will not show us
any proof.
Why ??
They can't !!!
any proof.
Why ??
They can't !!!
Ha of course they do, I mean you have to see it for yourself, looking through an eyepiece, not a lap top lol
------ This thread is Archived ------
tallman51: Nasa have that technology but of course will not show us
any proof.
Why ??
They can't !!!
any proof.
Why ??
They can't !!!
I imagine u are speaking of Hubble, that's like trying to see a single atom with a pair of binoculars, the optics just arent set up for that...
Next argument please.
------ This thread is Archived ------
NosleeptillStL: I imagine u are speaking of Hubble, that's like trying to see a single atom with a pair of binoculars, the optics just arent set up for that...
Next argument please.
Next argument please.
No I am not talking about hubble !
I am talking about their LRO that has been orbiting the moon since July 2010 and has the capabilities of taking photos up to
100 yards. They have the photos but we will never see them.
------ This thread is Archived ------
tallman51: No I am not talking about hubble !
I am talking about their LRO that has been orbiting the moon since July 2010 and has the capabilities of taking photos up to
100 yards. They have the photos but we will never see them.
I am talking about their LRO that has been orbiting the moon since July 2010 and has the capabilities of taking photos up to
100 yards. They have the photos but we will never see them.
Clear resolution of up to 100 yards, that's really good resolution, tell me tho,,, what did we "claim" to bring to the moon that is the size of a regulation size soccer field? If its only able to distinguish things that big, how would we see the lunar rover, which is MUCH smaller? Even Google earth makes my domicide look pretty blurry.
------ This thread is Archived ------
NosleeptillStL: Clear resolution of up to 100 yards, that's really good resolution, tell me tho,,, what did we "claim" to bring to the moon that is the size of a regulation size soccer field? If its only able to distinguish things that big, how would we see the lunar rover, which is MUCH smaller? Even Google earth makes my domicide look pretty blurry.
They have released photos of the 6 landing sites and they show the rover and other things but they are low res and I believe that they are fake. Again they got all the shadows wrong and their biggest fear now is that Japan's next probe will prove beyond all doubt that no such things exist on the moons surface.
If you want a link to the pics no problem !
------ This thread is Archived ------
i think....the u,s.a....is a great nation.....if they say they did............then they ....did.........dont ridiule..them......because they didit first....smackson green eye envey.........
------ This thread is Archived ------
tallman51: How do you know ?
Where's the proof ?
Do you believe everything you are told ?
Where's the proof ?
Do you believe everything you are told ?
you're missing the point
two possebilities:
it was a scam, implicates:
amerika had collected a lot of taxmonney for not going to the moon,not your best votewinner
it wasn't a scam:
what a hell of an achievement,from an engineering perspective
either way,from a business point of view the return value of spaceprograms is to be found in spin-offs.going to the moon was a fund raiser.the monney is spent...
------ This thread is Archived ------
deroderidder: you're missing the point
two possebilities:
it was a scam, implicates:
amerika had collected a lot of taxmonney for not going to the moon,not your best votewinner
it wasn't a scam:
what a hell of an achievement,from an engineering perspective
either way,from a business point of view the return value of spaceprograms is to be found in spin-offs.going to the moon was a fund raiser.the monney is spent...
two possebilities:
it was a scam, implicates:
amerika had collected a lot of taxmonney for not going to the moon,not your best votewinner
it wasn't a scam:
what a hell of an achievement,from an engineering perspective
either way,from a business point of view the return value of spaceprograms is to be found in spin-offs.going to the moon was a fund raiser.the monney is spent...
A very good point !!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Is this the announcement you've been writing about, OP?
------ This thread is Archived ------
SCatlyn: Is this the announcement you've been writing about, OP?
No but that is an interesting read !
Thanks.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Spaceshuttle delayed till the 16th !
Date: May 16 *
Mission: STS-134
Launch Vehicle: Space Shuttle Endeavour
Launch Site: Kennedy Space Center - Launch Pad 39A
STS-134 Description: Space shuttle Endeavour will deliver the Express Logistics Carrier-3 (ELC-3) and the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) to the International Space Station.
Date: May 16 *
Mission: STS-134
Launch Vehicle: Space Shuttle Endeavour
Launch Site: Kennedy Space Center - Launch Pad 39A
STS-134 Description: Space shuttle Endeavour will deliver the Express Logistics Carrier-3 (ELC-3) and the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) to the International Space Station.
------ This thread is Archived ------
cynicalorange: It couldn't have been real.
There isn't a McDonalds there
There isn't a McDonalds there
And in addition to the absence of hamburgers on the Moon there is no evidence that green cheese was brought back....
------ This thread is Archived ------
mustbnutz: And in addition to the absence of hamburgers on the Moon there is no evidence that green cheese was brought back....
Didn't Wallace and Gromit land there and bring some back??
------ This thread is Archived ------
cynicalorange: Didn't Wallace and Gromit land there and bring some back??
Excellent Orange !!
------ This thread is Archived ------
NosleeptillStL: About Orange,,,, That, my friends, is textbook comedy.
That was clearly the funniest post of the week.
That was clearly the funniest post of the week.
Yah, and I didn't troll anyone for it either.
I think the staff here should pay me in white wine for pure comedy value
Only kidding staff peeps.
I want Champagne
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
The world is as you see
What's going on
everything is changing
Icebergs Still Around
Reality Check
What I Lack In Vocabulary
Salami, Salami, Baloney
1830's Music
How far is too far?
Heavy Bass In The PM
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
See what I mean?